Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 11(2): 807-826, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179709

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need for an effective, oral therapy for COVID-19. Purified aqueous extract of Cocculus hirsutus (AQCH) has shown robust antiviral activity in in vitro studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AQCH plus standard of care in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19. METHODS: In an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in India, eligible patients (aged 18-75 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive AQCH 400 mg orally three times a day plus standard of care (AQCH group) or standard of care alone (control group) for 10 days. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing clinical improvement by day 14. Time to clinical improvement, time to viral clearance, and duration of hospitalization were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were randomized. By day 14 most patients in both groups showed clinical improvement [difference - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.07 to 0.05); p = 1.0]. Median time to clinical improvement was 8 days (IQR 8-11) in the AQCH group versus 11 days (IQR 8-11) in the control group [HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.95-1.71); p = 0.032]. Time to viral clearance and duration of hospitalization were also significantly shorter in the AQCH group (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.016, respectively). AQCH was well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified. CONCLUSIONS: AQCH significantly reduced time to clinical improvement, time to viral clearance, and duration of hospitalization. In a pandemic, this has significant potential to decrease healthcare resource utilization and increase hospital bed availability. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of AQCH in patients with COVID-19 is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI/2020/05/025397).

2.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 7(12): 2759-64, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24551631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are one of the major causes of morbidity. Development of newer drugs like SSRIs and atypical antipsychotics has altered the treatment paradigms. Various factors like cost of drugs, local paradigms, etc. play a role in the selection of drug therapy and hence, affect the outcome. Keeping this in mind, we conducted a study to delineate the various drugs used in psychiatric disorders, to find discrepancies, if any, between the actual and the ideal prescribing pattern of psychotropic drugs and to conduct a cost analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After our institutional ethics committee approved, a retrospective cross sectional drug utilization study of 600 prescriptions was undertaken. Preparation of the protocol and conduct of the study was as per the WHO - DUS and the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Drug use indicators - In 600 prescriptions, 1074 (88.25%) were psychotropic drugs. The utilization from the National and WHO EML was 100% and 90%, respectively. Average number of psychotropic drugs per prescription was 1.79 ± 1.02 (SD). 22.5% of the prescriptions contained psychotropic FDCs. 76.01% of drugs were prescribed by generic name. Percentage of psychotropic drugs prescribed from the hospital drug schedule and psychotropic drugs actually dispensed from the hospital drug store were 73.1% and 62.3%, respectively. Drug utilization pattern in different psychiatric disorders - Most commonly prescribed drugs for schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, depression and anxiety disorders were trifluoperazine + trihexiphenydyl (63.9%), carbamazepine (17.2%), amitriptyline (34.9%), and diazepam (23.8%), respectively. The least commonly prescribed drugs were levosulpiride (1.7%), lithium (1.3%), bupropion (4.7%) and clozapine (1.9%), respectively. The PDD/DDD ratio of three drugs - haloperidol, pimozide and amitriptyline - was equal to one. The cost borne by the hospital was 116, i.e., 65.2% of the total cost. The cost index of clozapine was 11.2. CONCLUSION: Overall, the principles of rational prescribing were followed. The hospital drug schedule should include more SSRIs. The practice of using 1(st) generation/ typical anti-psychotics as the first line was as per current recommendations. Anti-cholinergics should be used only in selected cases of patients on anti-psychotics. The use of diazepam should be curtailed and it should be used for short term only.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...