The initial health-system response to the earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, in February, 2011.

At 1251 h on Feb 22, 2011, an earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand, causing widespread destruction. The only regional acute hospital was compromised but was able to continue to provide care, supported by other hospitals and primary care facilities in the city. 6659 people were injured and 182 died in the initial 24 h. The massive peak ground accelerations, the time of the day, and the collapse of major buildings contributed to injuries, but the proximity of the hospital to the central business district, which was the most affected, and the provision of good medical care based on careful preparation helped reduce mortality and the burden of injury. Lessons learned from the health response to this earthquake include the need for emergency departments to prepare for: patients arriving by unusual means without prehospital care, manual registration and tracking of patients, patient reluctance to come into hospital buildings, complete loss of electrical power, management of the many willing helpers, alternative communication methods, control of the media, and teamwork with clear leadership. Additionally, atypical providers of acute injury care need to be integrated into response plans.

Flap Anchoring Following Primary Breast Cancer Surgery Facilitates Early Hospital Discharge and Reduces Costs.

BACKGROUND: Routine drain placement after breast cancer surgery is standard practice. Anchoring the axillary and mastectomy flaps to the underlying chest wall with sutures has been advocated as a means of avoiding drainage following breast surgery. This study compares outcomes following flap fixation or routine drain placement and uniquely considers the economic implications of each technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on seroma formation and wound infection following mastectomy and axillary clearance were recorded prospectively. Patients underwent either routine drain placement or flap anchoring using subcutaneous tacking sutures without drainage. Equipment and surgical bed costs were provided by our finance department. RESULTS: Data was available for 135 patients. 76 underwent flap anchoring without drainage and 59 had routine drainage. There was no difference in seroma rates between the two groups: 49% vs. 59% (p = 0.22). However, the length of hospital stay was reduced in the flap fixation group: 1.88 vs. 2.67 days (p < 0.0001). Per patient, flap suturing equated to an estimated financial saving of £ 240. CONCLUSIONS: Flap anchoring resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than routine drainage, with a comparable rate of seroma formation. This technique presents a viable alternative to drain placement and could lead to a considerable economic savings.