An educational intervention to promote a culture of gender equity among persons with traumatic brain injury and caregivers: A pilot study.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes are dependent on patients' biological sex (e.g., hormone levels) and sociocultural gender (e.g., norms, responsibilities). Informal caregivers additionally experience disruptions to identity and roles post-TBI. However, information on this topic remains largely unavailable to patients and caregivers. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a one-time educational intervention on sex and gender influences in TBI for patients and informal caregivers. Materials and methods: We conducted a pilot pre-test/post-test randomized control-group design study. Groups (i.e., passive, active and control) consisted a total of 16 persons with TBI and caregivers (75% persons with TBI, 63% women). Individual and group learning gains, and group-average normalized gain, were computed for three learning domains: knowledge, attitude, and skill. An intervention with an average normalized gain of ≥30% was considered effective. Educational intervention evaluation and qualitative comments post-participation were summarized. Results: The passive group demonstrated the highest average normalized gain across the three learning domains, including 100% for knowledge, 40% and 61% for attitude, and 37% for skill. The remaining groups did not reach an average normalized gain of ≥30%, except for the attitude domain of the control group (33% and 32%). Two key categories were identified qualitatively: (1) gendered self-expectations post-injury and (2) implications of gender stereotypes in rehabilitation, including the need for rehabilitation treatment to look beyond sex and gender. The post-participation educational session evaluation conveyed high appraisal of content, organization, and usability of the intervention. Conclusion: A one-time passive educational intervention on sex and gender in TBI may improve knowledge, attitude, and skill on the topic of sex and gender among adults with TBI and caregivers. Obtaining knowledge and skill on sex and gender effects in TBI can potentially help persons with TBI and caregivers adapt to changes in roles and behaviours post-injury.

Males and females differ in reported sexual functioning with escitalopram treatment for major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 study report.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant use for major depressive disorder (MDD) is frequently associated with sexual dysfunction. AIMS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between antidepressant treatment outcomes and sexual functioning (SF) were evaluated separately for males and females receiving escitalopram. We further assessed the association between pre- and posttreatment SF. METHODS: In all, 208 of the 211 CAN-BIND-1 trial participants (77 males and 131 females) with MDD and detectable drug blood levels were eligible for the analyses. All received escitalopram (10-20 mg) for 8 weeks. At baseline and Week 8, participants completed the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the SexFx scale, which measures sexual satisfaction and SF frequency. Mixed-model repeated measures assessed baseline to Week 8 SF changes among participants with different response/remission statuses. Multiple linear regression analyses examined SF differences between treatment outcomes at Week 8 as well as associations between pretreatment and eventual SF. RESULTS: For both sexes, overall sexual satisfaction improved among responders but not among nonresponders (p < 0.05). For females, overall SF frequency did not change significantly over time regardless of response status. For males, overall SF decreased significantly among nonresponders; orgasm decreased significantly among nonresponders and, to a lesser extent, among responders (p < 0.05). For both sexes, pretreatment SF was significantly associated with SF at Week 8 across all domains (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For both sexes, sexual satisfaction improves with response to escitalopram. For females, the response does not correspond to improvements in SF frequency. For males, SF frequency, particularly that of orgasm, declines regardless of response/nonresponse.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01655706.

Pain severity and pain interference during major depressive episodes treated with escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy: a CAN-BIND-1 report.

Escitalopram may have pain-alleviating effects for patients with comorbid pain and depression. This study aimed to quantify improvements in pain for patients on escitalopram and adjunctive aripiprazole. A secondary analysis of the CAN-BIND-1 trial was conducted which only included participants with a current depressive episode and pain. Participants received escitalopram (10-20mg) for eight weeks and treatment response was defined as a reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) of at least 50% from baseline. Non-responders at week 8 received adjunctive aripiprazole (2-10mg) for another eight weeks. The Brief Pain Inventory's pain severity (PSC) and pain interference (PIC) composite scores were measured at baseline, week 8, and week 16. Linear regression was used to determine how PSC and PIC differed between treatment responders and non-responders. Eighty-two participants with pain and depression received escitalopram. PSC and PIC decreased significantly regardless of treatment response at week 8, although responders had significantly lower PSC and PIC than non-responders. For the group receiving aripiprazole after week 8, neither PSC nor PIC improved further. Further research is needed to identify interventions that might treat both pain and depression symptoms.

Pretreatment anxious depression as a predictor of side effect frequency and severity in escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report side effect frequency and severity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy and to examine whether pretreatment anxious depression is associated with the number and presence of specific side effects. METHODS: 188 of the 211 trial participants provided information on side effects during treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg) for 8 weeks, and nonresponders received further augmentation on aripiprazole (2-10 mg) adjunctive therapy for another 8 weeks, whereas responders remained on escitalopram. Participants completed the Toronto Side Effects Scale at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 12. Covariate-adjusted negative binomial regression and Wilcoxon tests examined the association between anxious depression (GAD-7 ≥ 10) and number of side effects. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression and chi-square tests explored the association between anxious depression and specific side effects. RESULTS: For both therapies, the most frequent side effects were also the most severe. They mostly related to the central nervous system (CNS) (i.e., drowsiness and nervousness). Between baseline and week 2, the number of side effects participants experienced (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.38, p = .010) or had trouble with (IRR = 1.34, p = .026) was significantly higher among those with anxious depression for escitalopram but not adjunctive aripiprazole. Further, odds of experiencing and having trouble with nervousness and agitation were also significantly higher in anxious depression for escitalopram only (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients on escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy may experience and have trouble with CNS side effects. Pretreatment anxious depression may predispose escitalopram recipients with MDD to developing side effects, especially those related to anxiety.

Baseline anxiety, and early anxiety/depression improvement in anxious depression predicts treatment outcomes with escitalopram: A CAN-BIND-1 study report.

INTRODUCTION: Although anxiety symptoms frequently co-occur with major depressive disorder, few studies examined the prediction of treatment outcomes among participants with anxious depression receiving antidepressants. We investigated whether baseline anxiety, and early improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms predict eventual treatment outcomes. METHODS: 111 participants with anxious depression, defined using ≥ 10 on GAD-7, received escitalopram (10-20 mg) for 8 weeks. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression was conducted to examine the impact of baseline anxiety, and to assess the extent week 2 anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (QIDS-SR) percentage improvement associates with week 8 anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (MADRS) response/remission. Optimum improvement thresholds were identified using receiving-operating-curve analysis and their predictive values assessed. RESULTS: Greater percentage improvement in anxiety and depression after the first 2 weeks of treatment significantly increased odds of achieving week 8 anxiety and depression response/remission (OR:1.01-1.04, p<0.05). Early anxiety (68.4%/87.2%) and depression (52.2%/83.0%) improvement thresholds around 30 and 40% provided moderate to high positive predictive value (PPV) for predicting week 8 anxiety response/remission, as well as moderate to high negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting week 8 depression response/remission (anxiety:70.8%/91.7%; depression:72.2%/90.1%). Baseline anxiety severity predicted anxiety outcomes at weeks 2 and 8. LIMITATIONS: Trial lacked placebo group. CONCLUSION: In anxious depression, early improvement in anxiety may be better than depression in predicting anxiety outcomes, with similar or higher PPVs. Both improvement types perform similarly in predicting depression outcomes, with the lack of improvement predictive of non-response and non-remission. Finally, baseline anxiety predicts eventual anxiety but not depression outcomes.