Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(9)2021 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34511423

RESUMO

We report a case of a frail 68-year-old woman with stage 4 pancreatic carcinoma harbouring a fibroblastic growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion who achieved a durable complete response after treatment with erdafitinib a pan-FGFR inhibitor. The FGFR2-TACC2 fusion was detected on comprehensive tumour somatic mutation profiling. There is ongoing complete response at 10 months after initiation of erdafitinib. Transient central serous retinopathy, grade 2 hyperphosphataemia and diarrhoea were the adverse events encountered.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Idoso , Proteínas de Transporte , Feminino , Humanos , Mutação , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Pirazóis , Quinoxalinas , Receptor Tipo 2 de Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/genética , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 47(2): 319-331, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31863136

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The analysis of the [11C]PiB-PET amyloid images of a unique Asian cohort of 186 participants featuring overlapping vascular diseases raised the question about the validity of current standards for amyloid quantification under abnormal conditions. In this work, we implemented a novel pipeline for improved amyloid PET quantification of this atypical cohort. METHODS: The investigated data correction and amyloid quantification methods included motion correction, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) quantification using the parcellated MRI (standard method) and SUVr quantification without MRI. We introduced a novel amyloid analysis method yielding 2 biomarkers: AßL which quantifies the global Aß burden and ns that characterizes the non-specific uptake. Cut-off points were first determined using visual assessment as ground truth and then using unsupervised classification techniques. RESULTS: Subject's motion impacts the accuracy of the measurement outcome but has however a limited effect on the visual rating and cut-off point determination. SUVr computation can be reliably performed for all the subjects without MRI parcellation while, when required, the parcellation failed or was of mediocre quality in 10% of the cases. The novel biomarker AßL showed an association increase of 29.5% with the cognitive tests and increased effect size between positive and negative scans compared with SUVr. ns was found sensitive to cerebral microbleeds, white matter hyperintensity, volume, and age. The cut-off points for SUVr using parcellated MRI, SUVr without parcellation, and AßL were 1.56, 1.39, and 25.5. Finally, k-means produced valid cut-off points without the requirement of visual assessment. CONCLUSION: The optimal processing for the amyloid quantification of this atypical cohort allows the quantification of all the subjects, producing SUVr values and two novel biomarkers: AßL, showing important increased in their association with various cognitive tests, and ns, a parameter sensitive to non-specific retention variations caused by age and cerebrovascular diseases.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares , Amiloide , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides , Compostos de Anilina , Biomarcadores , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...