RESUMO
Introduction Stent thrombosis (ST) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication of primary or complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Multiple factors are said to precipitate ST, related to the patient's clinical comorbidities, lesion characteristics, operative technique, and post-procedural care. The older-generation stents were thought to be involved in early ST. Though the new generation of drug-eluting stents decreases the incidence of early and late ST, patients are still at risk of very late stent thrombosis (VLST). Objective To evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of definite ST in developing and resource-constrained countries like Pakistan, where PCIs, including primary PCI, complex PCI, and PCI in high-risk populations, are performed routinely. Methods This observational cross-sectional study included all patients who underwent primary and complex high PCI between 2012 and 2017 at TABBA Heart Institute (THI), Karachi, Pakistan. Results We included a total of 6587 patients in our study, and among the enrolled sample size, 22 (0.33%) had definite ST. Acute stent thrombosis (AST) was found in seven patients, sub-acute stent thrombosis (SAST) in 10, late stent thrombosis (LST) in two, and VLST were observed in three patients. The basic characteristics of our study ST population were as follows: mean age was 58 years, 95.5% were male, 4.5% were female, nine patients (40%) had diabetes mellitus, 15 patients (68%) had hypertension, 11 (50%) had dyslipidemia, and four patients were smokers (18%). Conclusion The frequency, risk factors, and rate of mortality of definite ST in the Pakistani population who underwent primary and complex high-risk PCI reflect nearly equal statistics observed in other studies. As seen in other international studies, the incidence rate of VLST was higher in our population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are two alternative methods for coronary revascularization, but it remains controversial as which one is associated with lower risks of worse clinical outcomes for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We determined the mode of coronary revascularization (PCI vs. CABG) which is associated with lower risk of mortality and morbidity in CKD patients. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, 159 patients with CKD were enrolled from single center of coronary revascularization at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi between January 2012 and August 2013. All patients with CKD underwent PCI or CABG. The primary outcome was in-hospital composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. We evaluated which mode of coronary revascularization was associated with reduced risks of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 159 patients with CKD, 85 (53.5%) received PCI and 74 (46.5%) received CABG. The primary finding of this study is that more patients with moderate to severe CKD underwent PCI and more patients with mild to moderate CKD underwent CABG. In both these categories, no difference was observed in clinical outcomes. There are few factors like age, ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and number of coronary artery disease predicted PCI as treatment strategy in patients with moderate to severe CKD. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe CKD have similar rates of short term clinical outcomes whether they underwent PCI or CABG. Therefore, PCI can be acceptable and less invasive treatment option alternative to CABG, particularly in patients with moderate to severe CKD.
