Muscle Activation During Single-Legged Squat Is Affected by Position of the Nonstance Limb.

CONTEXT: The single-legged squat (SLS) is appropriate for targeting activation, strengthening, and neuromuscular retraining of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and quadriceps. However, the effects of different nonstance-limb positions on muscle activity have not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the muscle activity of selected stance-limb hip muscles during the SLS using 3 nonstance-limb positions: in front (SLS-Front), in the middle (SLS-Middle), and in back (SLS-Back). DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 17 healthy adults (8 men, 9 women; age = 22.6 ± 3.6 years, height = 173.3 ± 10.7 cm, mass = 71.2 ± 11.0 kg) participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surface electromyographic data of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, lateral hamstrings, medial hamstrings, rectus femoris, and tensor fascia lata (TFL) as well as kinetic data of the hip and knee were collected while participants performed the 3 SLS tasks. Mean muscle-activation levels during the descent and ascent phases for the selected hip muscles and hip and knee kinetics in all 3 planes were compared for the 3 tasks. Each variable of interest was analyzed using a separate linear regression model with a generalized estimating equations correction. RESULTS: Muscle-activation levels of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, medial hamstrings, rectus femoris, and TFL for the stance limb during descent (P ≤ .04) and the medial hamstrings and TFL during ascent (P ≤ .002) were different among the SLS tasks. The greatest number of differences occurred between SLS-Front and SLS-Back. During descent, gluteal muscle activity was greater in SLS-Front (P ≤ .03) and SLS-Middle (P = .03) than in SLS-Back. For both phases, TFL activity was greater during SLS-Front than during both SLS-Middle and SLS-Back (P ≤ .006). Kinetic differences at the hip and knee between SLS tasks were also observed (P values ≤ .02). CONCLUSIONS: The 3 SLS tasks had different muscle-activation and kinetic profiles. Clinicians and researchers can vary nonstance-limb position during the SLS to manipulate muscle-activation levels and tailor the exercise to assist with goals at different stages of rehabilitation.

Effects of sex and walking speed on the dynamic stiffness of lower limb joints.

Fast walking may require a non-uniform change of dynamic stiffness among lower limb joints to deal with this daily task's demands. The change of dynamic joint stiffness may be distinct between females and males. This study aimed to test for differences in dynamic stiffness among lower limb joints in response to increased walking speed in males and females. Thirty-five participants walked in two randomized conditions: self-selected speed and fast speed (25% greater than the self-selected speed). Dynamic stiffnesses of the ankle, knee, and hip were calculated as the linear slope of the moment-angle curve's regression line during their major power absorption phase of the walking cycle. The comparison between conditions showed that the knee (p < 0.001) and hip (p = 0.031) increased their stiffness at the fast compared to self-selected speed. Ankle stiffness was not different between conditions (p = 0.818). The comparison among joints across speeds showed that the knee had a greater increase than the ankle (p = 0.001) and hip (p < 0.001), with no difference between ankle and hip (p = 0.081). The sex of the participant influenced only the ankle stiffness, in which males had greater stiffness than females (p = 0.008). These findings demonstrated that the lower limb joints changed their dynamic stiffness differently, and only the ankle stiffness was influenced by sex. The non-uniform adjustments of stiffness may provide the necessary stability and allow the individual to deal with greater demand for walking fast.

Individuals With Pre-arthritic Hip Pain Walk With Hip Motion Alterations Common in Individuals With Hip OA.

Background: Individuals with hip osteoarthritis (OA) commonly walk with less hip extension compared to individuals without hip OA. This alteration is often attributed to walking speed, structural limitation, and/or hip pain. It is unclear if individuals who are at increased risk for future OA (i.e., individuals with pre-arthritic hip disease [PAHD]) also walk with decreased hip extension. Objectives: (1) Determine if individuals with PAHD exhibit less hip extension compared to individuals without hip pain during walking, and (2) investigate potential reasons for these motion alterations. Methods: Adolescent and adult individuals with PAHD and healthy controls without hip pain were recruited for the study. Kinematic data were collected while walking on a treadmill at three walking speeds: preferred, fast (25% faster than preferred), and prescribed (1.25 m/s). Peak hip extension, peak hip flexion, and hip excursion were calculated for each speed. Linear regression analyses were used to examine the effects of group, sex, side, and their interactions. Results: Individuals with PAHD had 2.9° less peak hip extension compared to individuals in the Control group (p = 0.014) when walking at their preferred speed. At the prescribed speed, the PAHD group walked with 2.7° less hip extension than the Control group (p = 0.022). Given the persistence of the finding despite walking at the same speed, differences in preferred speed are unlikely the reason for the reduced hip extension. At the fast speed, both groups increased their hip extension, hip flexion, and hip excursion by similar amounts. Hip extension was less in the PAHD group compared to the Control group (p = 0.008) with no significant group-by-task interaction (p = 0.206). Within the PAHD group, hip angles and excursions were similar between individuals reporting pain and individuals reporting no pain. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that kinematic alterations common in individuals with hip OA exist early in the continuum of hip disease and are present in individuals with PAHD. The reduced hip extension during walking is not explained by speed, structural limitation, or current pain.

The effects of small and large varus alignment of the foot-ankle complex on lower limb kinematics and kinetics during walking: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The alignment of the foot-ankle complex may influence the kinematics and kinetics of the entire lower limb during walking. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effect of different magnitudes of varus alignment of the foot-ankle complex (small versus large) on the kinematics and kinetics of foot, ankle, knee, and hip in the frontal and transverse planes during walking. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHOD: Foot-ankle complex alignment in the frontal plane was measured as the angle between the metatarsal heads and the inferior edge of the examination table, measured with the volunteer in prone maintaining the ankle at 0° in the sagittal plane. The participants (n = 28) were divided into two groups according to their alignment angles. The first group had values equal to or inferior to the 45 percentile, and the second group had values equal to or above the 55 percentile. The lower limb kinematics and kinetics were evaluated with the participant walking at self-select speed in an instrumented treadmill. RESULTS: The group of large varus alignment showed significantly higher (p < 0.03) forefoot inversion angle at initial contact, amplitude of rearfoot-shank eversion, and peak of inversion ankle moment. There were no differences (p > 0.05) between the groups for knee and hip amplitudes and moments in the frontal and transverse planes. The durations of rearfoot-shank eversion, knee abduction, knee medial rotation, hip adduction, and hip medial rotation were not different between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Large varus alignment of the foot-ankle complex may increase the magnitude of foot pronation and ankle inversion moment during walking.

Position of the non-stance leg during the single leg squat affects females and males differently.

BACKGROUND: Kinematic differences between females and males for the single leg squat (SLS) have been identified. However, kinetic differences between sexes and how variations of the non-stance leg position during the SLS may affect kinematics and kinetics differently in females and males have not been examined. OBJECTIVES: Examine sex-specific kinematic and kinetic differences during the SLS task with 3 different non-stance leg positions. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study, cross-sectional design. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy adults (16 females, 16 males) performed the 3 SLS tasks while data were collected using a motion capture system and force plates. At 60 degrees of knee flexion (60KF) and peak knee flexion (PKF), kinematics and joint moments were compared between sexes and SLS tasks using a linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Females exhibited less ipsilateral trunk flexion (P < 0.001) and greater anterior pelvic tilt (P ≤ 0.021) and hip adduction (P < 0.001) than males across tasks at 60KF and PKF. Across tasks, females had a smaller knee flexion moment than males at PKF (P = 0.001). Females had a greater hip abduction moment during SLS-Front than SLS-Middle (P = 0.044) and SLS-Back (P = 0.003) at PKF, but males had similar hip abduction moments across tasks (P ≥ 0.299). At 60KF, males had a greater knee adduction moment during SLS-Front compared to the other tasks (P ≤ 0.019) while females had similar hip abduction moments across tasks (P ≥ 0.459). CONCLUSION: Altering the non-stance leg position during the SLS affects the kinematics and kinetics of both females and males. The position of the non-stance leg can be modified for assessment and treatment purposes and should be reported in research.

Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of gait in individuals with hip pain and a history of developmental dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) often report hip pain and exhibit gait adaptations. Previous studies in this patient population have focused on average kinematic and acceleration measures during gait, but have not examined variability. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do individuals with hip pain and DDH have altered kinematic variability or local dynamic stability (LDS) compared to individuals without hip pain? METHODS: Twelve individuals with hip pain and DDH and 12 matched controls walked for two minutes on a treadmill at three speeds: preferred, fast (25% faster than preferred), and prescribed (1.25 m/s). Kinematic variability of spatiotemporal measures, joint and segment angles, and LDS of the trunk were calculated for each speed. RESULTS: At the prescribed speed, individuals with hip pain and DDH had more kinematic variability than controls at the hip, pelvis, and trunk as well as greater variability in spatiotemporal measures. LDS was not different between groups. Kinematic variability of the joints decreased and LDS of the trunk increased (i.e., increased gait stability) with increased speed. SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with hip pain and DDH had greater kinematic variability compared to individuals without hip pain when walking at the same prescribed speed, indicating either an adaptation to pain or reduced neuromuscular control. LDS of the trunk was not different between groups, suggesting that hip pain does not affect overall gait stability. Kinematic variability and LDS were affected by walking speed, but in different ways, emphasizing that these measures quantify different aspects of walking behavior.

Gait Alterations in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Differ by Sex.

Background Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome may affect gait kinematics differently between males and females. Objectives To investigate whether individuals with FAI syndrome have different hip and pelvic motion during gait, at their preferred speed and a prescribed speed, compared to individuals of the same sex without pain. Methods Twenty-one participants (11 males and 10 females) with FAI syndrome and 41 participants (19 males and 22 females) without hip pain were included in this case-control laboratory study. There were no differences between the 2 groups in age, body mass index, and activity score. Kinematic data for all participants were collected while walking at a preferred speed and at 1.25 m/s. For sex and walking speed, linear regression analyses were used to examine the effect of group and the interaction of group by limb. Results At both speeds, males with FAI syndrome walked with more than 6° less peak hip extension (P≤.018), 5° greater anterior pelvic tilt (P≤.020), and 5° less posterior pelvic tilt (P≤.018) compared to males without hip pain. Females with FAI syndrome walked with 2° less hip extension (P≤.012) and at least 3° more hip adduction (P<.001) in the more painful hip than in the less painful hip at both speeds. Conclusion Males and females with FAI syndrome have different gait alterations when compared to a same-sex comparison group. In males, differences were between groups. In females with FAI syndrome, differences were between the more painful and the less painful limb. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(8):649-658. Epub 22 May 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7913.

Kinematic Differences During Single-Leg Step-Down Between Individuals With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Individuals Without Hip Pain.

Study Design Controlled laboratory study, case-control design. Background Despite recognition that femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a movement-related disorder, few studies have examined dynamic unilateral tasks in individuals with FAIS. Objectives To determine whether movements of the pelvis and lower extremities in individuals with FAIS differ from those in individuals without hip pain during a single-leg step-down, and to analyze kinematic differences between male and female participants within groups. Methods Individuals with FAIS and individuals without hip pain performed a single-leg step-down while kinematic data were collected. Kinematics were evaluated at 60° of knee flexion. A linear regression analysis assessed the main effects of group, sex, and side, and the interaction of sex by group. Results Twenty individuals with FAIS and 40 individuals without hip pain participated. Individuals with FAIS performed the step-down with greater hip flexion (4.9°; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5°, 9.2°) and anterior pelvic tilt (4.1°; 95% CI: 0.9°, 7.3°) than individuals without hip pain. Across groups, female participants performed the task with more hip flexion (6.1°; 95% CI: 1.7°, 10.4°), hip adduction (4.8°; 95% CI: 2.2°, 7.4°), anterior pelvic tilt (5.8°; 95% CI: 2.6°, 9.0°), pelvic drop (1.4°; 95% CI: 0.3°, 2.5°), and thigh adduction (2.7°; 95% CI: 1.3°, 4.2°) than male participants. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that individuals with FAIS have alterations in pelvic motion during a dynamic unilateral task. The noted altered movement patterns in the FAIS group may contribute to the development of hip pain and may be due to impairments that are modifiable through rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(4):270-279. Epub 6 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7794.

The Human Pelvis: Variation in Structure and Function During Gait.

The shift to habitual bipedalism 4-6 million years ago in the hominin lineage created a morphologically and functionally different human pelvis compared to our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees. Evolutionary changes to the shape of the pelvis were necessary for the transition to habitual bipedalism in humans. These changes in the bony anatomy resulted in an altered role of muscle function, influencing bipedal gait. Additionally, there are normal sex-specific variations in the pelvis as well as abnormal variations in the acetabulum. During gait, the pelvis moves in the three planes to produce smooth and efficient motion. Subtle sex-specific differences in these motions may facilitate economical gait despite differences in pelvic structure. The motions of the pelvis and hip may also be altered in the presence of abnormal acetabular structure, especially with acetabular dysplasia. Anat Rec, 300:633-642, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

NOT ALL SINGLE LEG SQUATS ARE EQUAL: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THREE VARIATIONS.

BACKGROUND: The single leg squat (SLS) is a functional task used by practitioners to evaluate and treat multiple pathologies of the lower extremity. Variations of the SLS may have different neuromuscular and biomechanical demands. The effect of altering the non-stance leg position during the SLS on trunk, pelvic, and lower extremity mechanics has not been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare trunk, pelvic, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and hip, knee, and ankle kinetics of three variations of the SLS using different non-stance leg positions: SLS-Front, SLS-Middle, and SLS-Back. METHODS: Sixteen healthy women performed the three SLS tasks while data were collected using a motion capture system and force plates. Joint mechanics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were compared for the SLS tasks using a separate repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each variable at two analysis points: peak knee flexion (PKF) and 60 ° of knee flexion (60KF). RESULTS: Different non-stance leg positions during the SLS resulted in distinct movement patterns and moments at the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremity. At PKF, SLS-Back exhibited the greatest kinematic differences (p < 0.05) from SLS-Front and SLS-Middle with greater ipsilateral trunk flexion, pelvic anterior tilt and drop, hip flexion and adduction, and external rotation as well as less knee flexion and abduction. SLS-Back also showed the greatest kinetic differences (p < 0.05) from SLS-Front and SLS-Middle with greater hip external rotator moment and knee extensor moment as well as less hip extensor moment and knee adductor moment at PKF. At 60KF, the findings were similar except at the knee. CONCLUSION: The mechanics of the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremity during the SLS were affected by the position of the non-stance leg in healthy females. Practitioners can use these findings to distinguish between SLS variations and to select the appropriate SLS for assessment and rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Differences in Lower Extremity and Trunk Kinematics between Single Leg Squat and Step Down Tasks.

The single leg squat and single leg step down are two commonly used functional tasks to assess movement patterns. It is unknown how kinematics compare between these tasks. The purpose of this study was to identify kinematic differences in the lower extremity, pelvis and trunk between the single leg squat and the step down. Fourteen healthy individuals participated in this research and performed the functional tasks while kinematic data were collected for the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremities using a motion capture system. For the single leg squat task, the participant was instructed to squat as low as possible. For the step down task, the participant was instructed to stand on top of a box, slowly lower him/herself until the non-stance heel touched the ground, and return to standing. This was done from two different heights (16 cm and 24 cm). The kinematics were evaluated at peak knee flexion as well as at 60° of knee flexion. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the angles at those two time points were also calculated to better understand the relationship between each task. The tasks resulted in kinematics differences at the knee, hip, pelvis, and trunk at both time points. The single leg squat was performed with less hip adduction (p ≤ 0.003), but more hip external rotation and knee abduction (p ≤ 0.030), than the step down tasks at 60° of knee flexion. These differences were maintained at peak knee flexion except hip external rotation was only significant in the 24 cm step down task (p ≤ 0.029). While there were multiple differences between the two step heights at peak knee flexion, the only difference at 60° of knee flexion was in trunk flexion (p < 0.001). Angles at the knee and hip had a moderate to excellent correlation (r = 0.51-0.98), but less consistently so at the pelvis and trunk (r = 0.21-0.96). The differences in movement patterns between the single leg squat and the step down should be considered when selecting a single leg task for evaluation or treatment. The high correlation of knee and hip angles between the three tasks indicates that similar information about knee and hip kinematics was gained from each of these tasks, while pelvis and trunk angles were less well predicted.

Postural correction reduces hip pain in adult with acetabular dysplasia: A case report.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is often diagnosed in infancy, but less severe cases of acetabular dysplasia are being detected in young active adults. The purpose of this case report is to present a non-surgical intervention for a 31-year-old female with mild acetabular dysplasia and an anterior acetabular labral tear. The patient presented with right anterior hip and groin pain, and she stood with the trunk swayed posterior to the pelvis (swayback posture). The hip pain was reproduced with the anterior impingement test. During gait, the patient maintained the swayback posture and reported 6/10 hip pain. Following correction of the patient's posture, the patient's pain rating was reduced to a 2/10 while walking. The patient was instructed to maintain the improved posture. At the 1 year follow-up, she demonstrated significantly improved posture in standing and walking. She had returned to recreational running and was generally pain-free. The patient demonstrated improvement on self-reported questionnaires for pain, function, and activity. These findings suggest that alteration of posture can have an immediate and lasting effect on hip pain in persons with structural abnormality and labral pathology.