Peanut oral immunotherapy using an extensively heated and baked novel composition of peanuts.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an increasingly acceptable therapeutic option for peanut-allergic (PA) children, despite significant side effects. Major peanut allergenic proteins are heat-resistant and are not rendered hypoallergenic after baking or cooking. Lyophilized peanut protein-MH (LPP-MH) is a novel composition from developing peanuts, enabling cooking-induced reduction in allergenicity. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of OIT, with extensively heated and baked (EHEB) LPP-MH in PA children. METHODS: In a single-arm, single-center, pilot study, PA children with a single highest tolerated dose of <100 mg peanut protein were placed on a 40-week OIT protocol with 300 mg daily of heat-treated LPP-MH. A repeat open peanut food challenge was performed after 40 weeks of treatment and at a 6-12 months of follow-up visit. RESULTS: Thirty-three children with PA were enrolled, with a mean cumulative tolerated dose (MCTD) of 71.2 mg PP (95% CI 45-100 mg). After 40 weeks, 32/33 patients were able to consume more than 300 mg of natural PP, with MCTD of 1709 mg (CI 365-3675 mg). There were no severe allergic reactions requiring epinephrine, during any of the observed LPP-MH challenges or any treatment related doses at home. After 6-12 months on daily maintenance, the MCTD was 8821 mg (95% CI 1930-13,500 mg). This enabled most children age-appropriate dietary inclusion of peanuts. CONCLUSION: An OIT protocol with heat-treated LPP-MH, a novel composition from developing peanuts, seems a potentially safe and efficacious OIT modality for PA children, enabling the introduction of dietary levels of peanut proteins in highly allergic PA children. Validation in randomized controlled studies is mandated.

Omalizumab withdrawal outcomes in chronic spontaneous urticaria are linked with baseline IgE and eosinophil levels.

Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is an immune-mediated skin disease that may require prolonged treatments. Currently, there are no recommendations for treatment discontinuation once CSU symptoms are controlled, particularly among patients primarily diagnosed with severe CSU. Objective: In this real-life study we aimed to describe our experience of omalizumab (Oma) treatment withdrawal in CSU and define biomarkers related to these outcomes. Methods: CSU patients followed at our allergy clinic from January 2016 to December 2022 were included. Response to Oma therapy, and Oma-withdrawal outcomes among patients who reached complete remission for >6 months were analyzed. Results: During the study period 192/335(%) CSU patients were categorized as severe-CSU and entitled to receive Oma according to our country's regulations. Of them, 131/192(68%) were considered "Oma-responders", and 95/131(72.5%) patients underwent gradual treatment withdrawal. Successful Oma-withdrawal was documented in 47/95(49.5%) whereas 48/95(50.5%) patients experienced flare and were defined as unsuccessful OMA-withdrawal. The first was associated with shorter disease duration 7.1 ± 7.4 years vs. 10.7 ± 9.4 (P = 0.042), lower baseline-IgE 81.6 ± 84.1IU/ml vs. 324.7 ± 555.9 (P = 0.005), and lower baseline-eosinophils count 131.4 ± 110.5 vs. 195.6 ± 98.4 (P = 0.043) in comparison to failure of Oma-withdrawal group. Conclusion: OMA may be successfully withdrawn in up to 50% of severe CSU patients following complete remission of disease symptoms, utilizing a gradual withdrawal protocol. Oma-withdrawal failure was linked with longer duration of disease as well as high IgE and eosinophil counts prior to initiation of Oma therapy. These parameters may enable the design of a treatment withdrawal algorithm.

Heart valve disease in primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated heart valve disease (HVD) is well described. Nonetheless, limited data exist on clinical parameters associated with the course of primary APS (pAPS) patients with HVD. The goal of this study was to assess clinical features and related outcomes in patients with APS associated HVD. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, we identified 33 pAPS patients with HVD (pAPS-HVD group) and compared their clinical course with 128 pAPS patients with normal heart valves on echocardiography (pAPS-control group). RESULTS: pAPS-HVD patients had more cerebrovascular events 56.3% vs 25% (p= 0.005) and livedo reticularis 24.2% vs 7.8% (p= 0.013) than pAPS-controls. Furthermore, catastrophic-APS (CAPS) (12.1% vs 2.4%, p= 0.034), recurrent thrombosis (33.3% vs 4.7%, p< 0.001), and need for advanced therapy (i.e. IVIG, plasmapheresis or rituximab) were more frequent in pAPS-HVD patients. Anti-B2GPI-IgG. [84.8% vs 63.2% (p= 0.034)], anti-cardiolipin IgG [90.9% vs. 64.8% (p= 0.005)] and triple positive aPL [75.8% vs 56.5% (p= 0.047)] were commoner in pAPS-HVD patients vs pAPS-controls. Ten of the 33 patients with pAPS-HVD underwent valve surgery which was associated with male gender, smoking, arterial limb ischaemia and livedo reticularis. CONCLUSION: pAPS-HVD patients had a more severe APS clinical course including CAPS and thrombotic events as well as with specific serology namely IgG isotype aPL antibodies and triple positivity. Our data suggest that pAPS-HVD represents a high-risk subgroup of APS patients.

Late Hypersensitivity Reactions to the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Are Linked to Delayed Skin Sensitization and Prior Exposure to Hyaluronic Acid.

Background: Late hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to the BNT162b2-vaccine have raised concerns regarding its safety, particularly as further immunizations are required. The yield of skin testing with the BNT162b2v is unclear, as well as the risk factors and outcomes of re-immunization after late HSRs. Objective: We studied a series of patients with late HSRs to BNT162b2v. Methods: Patients referred to the Sheba medical center from December 2020 to May 2021 with late HSRs to the first dose of BNT162b2 were included. HSRs were defined as late if they appeared or lasted >24 h after inoculation. We compared late HSRs to immediate HSRs that appeared within minutes−2 h after vaccination. Intradermal testing with PEG-containing medication and BNT162b2v was performed. Results: A total of 17 patients that presented with late HSRs (study group) were compared to 34 patients with immediate HSRs (control group). Delayed sensitivity to intradermal testing of the BNT162b2v was observed in 9/17 (53%) of the study group compared to 4/34 (12%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Former exposure to a dermal filler with hyaluronic acid was documented among 7/17 (41%) vs. 2/34 (6%) in the study and control groups, respectively, (p = 0.0038). All patients who presented with late HSRs were advised to receive subsequent doses of the BNT162b2v vaccine with or without concomitant medication, and all were re-immunized successfully. Conclusions: Late HSRs to BNT162b2v were linked with positive responses to intradermal testing with the vaccine and prior exposure to derma fillers with hyaluronic acid. This may elude to an immune mechanism triggered by former exposures. Although further studies are needed, late HSRs to the BNT162b2-vaccine did not prevent patients from receiving subsequent doses of the vaccines.

A clinical pathway for the diagnosis of sesame allergy in children.

Background: Sesame allergy (SA) is a common cause of life-threatening, persistent food allergy, not only in the Middle East and Asia, but increasingly worldwide. Commercially available tests such as extracts for skin testing or specific IgE for sesame or its components in serum, have very limited predictive values. Therefore the diagnosis is dependent on the performance of oral food challenges (OFC), frequently avoided in children, due to time and resource constraints, as well as the risk of anaphylaxis. In the current study we aimed to develop a simple, readily available, clinical tool, able to predict sesame OFC outcomes in children. Methods: Children with a history of SA were evaluated in the outpatient allergy clinic. All children underwent natural sesame OFC, with an additional baked-sesame challenge offered to children with SA. Clinical data were compared between the sesame tolerant (ST) and SA groups. Machine-learning tools were applied, to create a simple, clinically driven, decision tree analysis (DTA), predicting the outcome of sesame OFCs and the diagnosis of SA. Results: One hundred four children, mean age 47.2 months, 58% boys were included, with a high prevalence of additional food allergies, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and rhinitis. Following OFC, 56 (54%) were diagnosed as ST and 48 (46%) SA. Among SA children, 85% were able to consume baked-sesame in equal or higher protein amounts compared to natural sesame paste. Compared to ST, SA children had a tendency towards a higher incidence of allergic rhinitis (5% Vs 17%, p = 0.062), multiple food allergies (3.6% vs 12.5%, p = 0.09) and requiring medical treatment after the initial SA reaction (27% vs 41%, p = 0.022). As a group, skin tests with both commercial and natural tahini paste differed significantly between ST and SA (mean wheal in mm, for extract 4.2 vs 13.4, p < 0.001 and for natural sesame paste 6.7 vs 24.4, p < 0.001), However, the PPV of any individual test was only between 60%-85%. Our exploratory, clinical DTA, predicted OFC outcomes and the presence or absence of Sesame Allergy, with ≥96% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values. Conclusion: OFCs remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of Sesame Allergy and are indicated to define ST/SA status even in highly atopic patients with previous immediate allergic reactions to sesame. A decision-tree analysis based on clinical parameters easily available in every allergy clinic, can predict the outcome of sesame OFC in the vast majority of children, increasing the safety and availability of such diagnostic procedures.

Assessment of Immediate Allergic Reactions After Immunization With the Pfizer BNT162b2 Vaccine Using Intradermal Skin Testing With the COVID-19 Vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have raised concerns, particularly as repeated doses are required. Skin tests with the vaccines excipient were found to be of low value, whereas the utility of skin tests with the whole vaccine is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a panel of skin tests and the outcomes of subsequent doses of immunization among subjects who suffered an immediate allergic reaction to the BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Between March and December 2021, patients who experienced symptoms consistent with immediate allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine and were referred to the Sheba Medical Center underwent skin testing with polyethylene glyol (PEG)-containing medicines, Pfizer-BNT162b2, and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222). Further immunization was performed accordingly and under medical observation. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent skin testing for suspected allergy to the COVID vaccines, of which 38 of 51 (74.5%) were nonreactive, 7 of 51(13.7%) had no skin sensitization but suffered a clinical reaction during skin testing (mainly cough), and 6 of 51 (11.7%) exhibited immediate skin sensitization. Both skin sensitization and cough during testing were related to a higher use of adrenaline following immunization (P = .08 and P = .024, respectively). Further immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine was recommended unless sensitization or severe reaction to previous immunization was evident. The latter were referred to be tested/receive the alternative AZD1222 vaccine. Ten patients underwent skin testing with AZD1222: 2 of 10 (20%) demonstrated skin sensitization to both vaccines; thus, 8 of 10 were immunized with the AZD1222, of which 2 of 8 (25%) had allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare but can be severe and reoccur. Intradermal testing with the whole vaccine may discriminate sensitized subjects, detect cross-sensitization between vaccines, and enable estimation of patients at higher risk.

Oral immunotherapy for children with a high-threshold peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Between 25% and 30% of children with peanut allergy (PA) have a relatively high-threshold peanut allergy (HTPA), with a single maximal tolerated dose (SMTD) higher than 100 mg of peanut protein (PP). However, this threshold may decrease with time, age, exercise, illness, sleep deprivation, and other covariates. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of a simplified oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol in a group of children with HTPA. METHODS: Children with PA with an SMTD higher than 100 mg were placed on a 40-week OIT protocol of either 300 mg/d of PP or 100 mg/d for 20 weeks followed by 300 mg/d for 20 weeks. A repeat open peanut food challenge was performed after 40 weeks of treatment and at a 6-month follow-up visit. After the 40-week challenge, all children received a maintenance dosage of 2 gPP 3 times a week. RESULTS: A total of 28 children with HTPA were enrolled, with 56% boys, 89% younger than 6 years old, and a mean SMTD of 304 mg (95% confidence interval 229-378). All were placed on the described OIT protocol. Overall, 2 children were not compliant and 3 had allergic reactions at home on the dose previously tolerated in clinic, 23 completed the 40-week protocol, and all were able to consume 2 g of PP. The mean tolerated dosage at the 6-month follow-up was 8 g. This enabled most children age-appropriate dietary inclusion of peanut-containing products. CONCLUSION: In children with HTPA, a simple, fixed-dose OIT can be both safe and efficacious.

[LITTLE FIRE ANT (WASMANNIA AUROPUNCTATA) IN ISRAEL - FROM NUISANCE TO LIFE-THREATENING].

INTRODUCTION: The little fire ant (LFA) is an invasive ant species, increasingly found in wide distribution in Israel. Although it's sting is painful and itchy, for the most part, no serious adverse effects have been reported so far. We describe the case of a young boy with recurrent, life threatening anaphylactic reactions after stings, all occurring during the summer months, in areas where LFA infestations have been identified. An ad hoc skin test, developed with the cooperation of the allergy and entomology team, identified an immediate IgE-mediated reaction to LFA whole body extract, present in our patients and absent in healthy controls. This report may be the first identifying the LFA as a potential cause of severe anaphylactic reactions, but unfortunately, given the wide spread of these pests, it may be that such unrecognized reactions have already been treated by medical teams and misclassified as idiopathic anaphylaxis.

Diagnosis of Peanut Allergy in Preschool Children: The Impact of Skin Testing With a Novel Composition of Peanuts.

Peanut allergy is an increasing concern in younger children. Available bedside diagnostic tools, i.e., prick tests with commercial extracts or peanut-containing foods have only limited predictive values. In a cohort of preschoolers with both a history of allergic reactions and sensitization to peanut proteins, we aimed to characterize the impact of skin tests with a novel composition of peanuts LPP-MH. Almost one quarter (27/110) of preschool children, with a history of allergic reactions to peanuts and positive standard IgE-mediated tests for peanut allergy, can tolerate the reintroduction of peanut proteins into their diet after resolving their allergy and, thus, can avoid adverse health outcomes associated with the false diagnosis. In the younger age group, a quarter of peanut allergic children, display a relatively high threshold, potentially enabling an easier and safer oral immunotherapy protocol in this window of opportunity in childhood. The use of the novel diagnostic skin test, LPP-MH, significantly improves the predictive value of outpatient evaluation for the outcomes of peanut challenge as well as the expected threshold at which the PA child will react, thus, making for a better informed decision of how, when, and where to challenge.

Prevalence of Allergic Reactions After Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccination Among Adults With High Allergy Risk.

Importance: Allergic reactions among some individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine discourage patients with allergic conditions from receiving this vaccine and physicians from recommending the vaccine. Objective: To describe the assessment and immunization of highly allergic individuals with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective cohort study from December 27, 2020, to February 22, 2021, 8102 patients with allergies who applied to the COVID 19 vaccine referral center at the Sheba Medical Center underwent risk assessment using an algorithm that included a detailed questionnaire. High-risk patients (n = 429) were considered "highly allergic" and were immunized under medical supervision. Exposures: Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Allergic and anaphylactic reactions after the first and second doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among highly allergic patients. Results: Of the 429 individuals who applied to the COVID-19 referral center and were defined as highly allergic, 304 (70.9%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 52 (16) years. This highly allergic group was referred to receive immunization under medical supervision. After the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, 420 patients (97.9%) had no immediate allergic event, 6 (1.4%) developed minor allergic responses, and 3 (0.7%) had anaphylactic reactions. During the study period, 218 highly allergic patients (50.8%) received the second BNT162b2 vaccine dose, of which 214 (98.2%) had no allergic reactions and 4 patients (1.8%) had minor allergic reactions. Other immediate and late reactions were comparable with those seen in the general population, except for delayed itch and skin eruption, which were more common among allergic patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The rate of allergic reactions to BNT162b2 vaccine, is higher among patients with allergies, particularly among a subgroup with a history of high-risk allergies. This study suggests that most patients with a history of allergic diseases and, particularly, highly allergic patients can be safely immunized by using an algorithm that can be implemented in different medical facilities and includes a referral center, a risk assessment questionnaire, and a setting for immunization under medical supervision of highly allergic patients. Further studies are required to define more specific risk factors for allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine.

An EAACI Task Force report on allergy to beta-lactams in children: Clinical entities and diagnostic procedures.

Beta-lactam (BL) allergy suspicion is common in children and constitutes a major public health problem, with an impact on patient's health and on medical costs. However, it has been found that most of these reactions are not confirmed by a complete allergic workup. The diagnostic value of the currently available allergy tests has been investigated intensively recently by different groups throughout the world. This has led to major changes in the management of children with a suspected BL allergy. Particularly, it is now well accepted that skin tests can be skipped before the drug provocation test in children with a benign non-immediate reaction to BL. However, there is still a debate on the optimal allergic workup to perform in children with a benign immediate reaction. In addition, management of children with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions remains difficult. In this review, based on a selection of the most relevant studies found in the literature, we will review and discuss the diagnosis of different forms of BL allergy in children.

Combination therapy with omalizumab and an immune-suppressive agent for resistant chronic spontaneous rrticaria - A real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a relatively common immune mediated disease that can be effectively treated nowadays. Nevertheless, for some patients remission cannot be achieved following current treatment recommendations, defined as resistant CSU (r-CSU). Treating r-CSU is challenging, and, currently, there are no recommended interventions. In this real-life study we describe successful therapy of 18 r-CSU patients using an "intensified protocol" of anti-IgE-antibody (omalizumab) concomitantly with an immunosuppressant. We defined the r-CSU phenotype and compared it to omalizumab-responsive CSU (Or-CSU) phenotype. METHODS: Clinical and serological data of 72 CSU patients (ie, 18 r-CSU and 54 age and sex matched Or-CSU) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with CSU for ≥6 months and treated at the Sheba Medical Center during 2013-2018. RESULTS: Of 289 CSU patients, 18 (6%) were diagnosed with r-CSU and treated with the "intensified protocol" including omalizumab and cyclosporine-A (16p), methotrexate (1p), and azathioprine (1p). Of which, 14/18 (78%) achieved complete remission, 2/18 (11%) partial remission, and 2/18 (11%) no remission. During follow-up no serious adverse events were documented. r-CSU patients received higher doses of antihistamine (p < 0.0001) and omalizumab (425 ± 58 mg/month vs. 283 ± 86 mg/month; p < 0.0001) compared to Or-CSU. The r-CSU phenotype was linked with concomitant autoimmunity (p = 0.0005) and a lower level of IgE prior to initiation of therapy (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: r-CSU may be a distinct CSU phenotype characterized by severe disease, concomitant autoimmunity, and lower baseline-IgE levels (low "autoallergy"). An "intensified protocol" with omalizumab and an immunosuppressive agent was found to be efficacious and safe for r-CSU. Further larger studies are required to verify these results.

Allergy and inhibitors in hemophilia - a rare complication with potential novel solutions.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of the plasma coagulation factors VIII and IX (hemophilia A [HA] and hemophilia B [HB], respectively). Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates is the mainstay of treatment. Unlike in patients with HB, anaphylaxis in patients with HA is extremely rare. METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data on patients with hemophilia who experienced anaphylaxis was conducted in our center. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and laboratory workups that included thrombin generation were conducted. RESULTS: Our first patient underwent successful immune tolerance induction (ITI) following the administration of rituximab. The second patient was transitioned to emicizumab. The third patient receives recombinant activated VIIa (rFVIIa) on demand. Thrombin generation was performed following current medical management protocols for supporting hemostasis. DISCUSSION: Our case series illustrates the difficulty in managing patients with anaphylaxis to replacement therapy. In the era of novel therapies, such as emicizumab, the management of HA patients who experience anaphylaxis to replacement therapy is becoming easier and may obviate the need for ITI. Current treatment strategies for HB patients with such anaphylaxis, however, are limited to rFVIIa, and it continues to pose a challenge.

The innate immune perspective of autoimmune and autoinflammatory conditions.

Innate immunity is one of two immune defence system arms. It is present at birth and does not require 'learning' through exposure to foreign organisms. It activates various mechanisms collectively to eliminate pathogens and hold an infection until the adaptive response are mounted. The innate immune system consists of four elements: the epithelial barrier, cells (e.g. macrophages, NK cells), plasma proteins (e.g. complement) and cytokines. These components act in concert to induce complex processes, as well as recruitment, activation and differentiation of adaptive responses. The innate response is more than just the 'first line of defence', as it essentially withholds the vast majority of any intruder, has a complex interplay with the adaptive arm and is crucial for survival of the host. Finally, yet importantly, a myriad of diseases has been linked with innate immune dysregulation. In this mini-review we will shed some light on these conditions, particularly regarding autoinflammatory ones.

A structured graduated protocol with heat denatured eggs in the treatment of egg allergy.

BACKGROUND: Most children with egg allergy (EA) can tolerate extensively heated and baked egg (EHBE). Consumption of EHBE may promote faster resolution of EA; however, no consensus exists as to the required amounts and treatment protocols. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a structured graduated exposure protocol (SGEP) with EHBE in promoting tolerance to eggs in EA children under 2 years of age. METHODS: In a case-control study, EA children aged < 2 years who were treated with SGEP including EHBE were compared to children treated with strict avoidance. Data were collected from records and telephone questionnaires. Analysis was performed using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-nine egg-allergic children with a median age at intervention of 16 months (interquartile range: 13-19) were treated with SGEP and followed to a median age of 39 months (26.8-50.0). The median age at resolution of EA was compared to a matched group of 80 children treated with strict avoidance at least until 2 years of age or earlier natural resolution and followed to a median age of 69 months (46-104). The median estimated age at EA resolution in the SGEP group was 24 months (95% CI, 19.5-28.5 months), compared to 78 months (95% CI, 53-102) in the control group, P < .001. At last follow-up, 82% of treated children were tolerant to lightly cooked eggs vs 54% of controls, P = .001. CONCLUSION: A structured protocol with EHBE appears to promote faster resolution of EA.

Diagnosis and management of drug-induced anaphylaxis in children: An EAACI position paper.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) constitute a major and common public health problem, particularly in children. One of the most severe manifestations of DHR is anaphylaxis, which might be associated with a life-threatening risk. During those past decades, anaphylaxis has received particularly a lot of attention and international consensus guidelines have been recently published. Whilst drug-induced anaphylaxis is more commonly reported in adulthood, less is known about the role of drugs in pediatric anaphylaxis. Betalactam antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most commonly involved drugs, probably related to high prescription rates. Diagnosis relies on the recognition of symptoms pattern and is based on complete allergic workup, particularly including skin tests and/or specific IgE. However, the real diagnostic value of those tests to diagnose immediate reactions in children remains not well defined for a significant number of the drugs. Generally, a drug provocation test is discussed to confirm or exclude an immediate-onset drug-induced hypersensitivity. Although avoidance of the incriminated drug (and related drug) is the rule, rapid desensitization is useful in selected subgroups of patients. There is a need for large, multicentric studies, to evaluate the real diagnostic value of the currently available skin tests. Moreover there is also a need to develop new diagnostic tests in the future to improve the management of these children.

Controversies in Drug Allergy: Beta-Lactam Hypersensitivity Testing.

All beta-lactam use is associated with a certain rate of adverse reactions. Many of these adverse reactions result in an allergy to the beta-lactam being entered into the patient's medical record. Unfortunately, only a small minority of these recorded allergies are clinically significant immunologically mediated drug hypersensitivity. An unconfirmed allergy to beta-lactams is a significant public health risk, because patients so labeled typically do not receive narrow-spectrum penicillins and cephalosporins when clinically indicated. The alternative antibiotics they receive result in poorer clinical outcomes, increased incidence of serious antibiotic-resistant infections, prolonged hospitalizations, and greater health care utilization. There is a wide variation in beta-lactam allergy incidence and prevalence around the world, based in part on the specific beta-lactams used and overused. There is a wide variation in specific protocols used to confirm current tolerance of beta-lactams and remove these inaccurate allergy reports. Harmonizing testing protocols, when possible, may lead to more widespread use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactams, when clinically indicated, and improve patient safety worldwide. Further research is needed to better understand the regional differences in reporting beta-lactam allergy as this relates to regional differences in beta-lactam use and overuse, the frequency of clinically significant immunologically mediated beta-lactam hypersensitivity, and the optimal testing strategies to confirm current tolerance, based on presenting clinical symptoms.

A Structured Gradual Exposure Protocol to Baked and Heated Milk in the Treatment of Milk Allergy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a structured gradual exposure protocol (SGEP) with extensively heated and baked milk in promoting allergy resolution in children with cow milk allergy (CMA). STUDY DESIGN: In a case control study, children with CMA aged 1-4 years who were treated with SGEP including extensively heated and baked milk, were compared with children treated with strict avoidance. Data were collected from medical records and from validated telephone questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using a nonparametric Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard Cox regression model, after evaluation of the adequacy of the case control matching. RESULTS: There were 43 children with milk allergy-26 (62%) males with a mean age at intervention of 21 months (range, 12-47 months)-who were treated with SGEP and followed to a mean age of 40 months (range, 20-82 months). The median age at resolution of CMA was compared with a matched group of 67 children treated with strict avoidance at least until 4 years of age or followed until earlier resolution, with a mean age at follow-up of 71 months (range, 11-176 months). The median estimated age at CMA resolution in the SGEP group was 36 months (95% CI, 34.5-49.7) compared with 98 months (95% CI, 82.4-114.1) in controls (P < .001). At last follow-up, 86% of treated children were tolerant to unheated milk proteins vs 52% of controls (P = .003). CONCLUSION: A structured protocol with extensively heated and baked milk seems to promote faster resolution of CMA.

EAACI/ENDA Position Paper: Diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children and adolescents.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in the pediatric population as antipyretics/analgesics and anti-inflammatory medications. Hypersensitivity (HS) reactions to NSAID in this age group, while similar to adults, have unique diagnostic and management issues. Although slowly accumulating, published data in this age group are still relatively rare and lacking a unifying consensus. This work is a summary of current knowledge and consensus recommendations utilizing both published data and expert opinion from the European Network of Drug Allergy (ENDA) and the Drug Hypersensitivity interest group in the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). This position paper summarizes diagnostic and management guidelines for children and adolescents with NSAIDs hypersensitivity.