Evaluation of Virtual Enhanced Child Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Because of COVID-19 pandemic social distancing requirements, the in-person Child Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE) positive parenting intervention was adapted for virtual delivery. Objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the virtual PriCARE program to improve parenting capacity, decrease child behavioral problems, and decrease child maltreatment risk. METHODS: Caregivers of children 2 to 6 years old recruited from pediatric primary care were randomized to PriCARE (n = 92) or waitlist control (n = 90). Dysfunctional parenting, positive parenting skills, child behaviors, and child maltreatment risk were measured at baseline and 2 to 3 months after intervention using the Parenting Scale (PS), Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS), Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), and Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI). Kruskal-Wallis test compared median change scores from baseline to follow-up by treatment arm. RESULTS: Of 182 enrolled caregivers, 92% (168) were mothers and 67% (122) completed study measures at baseline and follow-up. The median decrease (improvement) in total PS score was greater in the PriCARE group compared with the control group (-0.3 [IQR 0.69] vs -0.1 [IQR 0.56], p = 0.028) as was the median decrease (improvement) in ECBI problem score (-3 [IQR 9] vs -1 [IQR 7], p = 0.045) and ECBI intensity score (-9 [IQR 21] vs 0 [IQR 25], p = 0.006). Improvements in 4 positive parenting skills measured by DPICS were greater in the PriCARE group compared with the control group (all p< 0.003). Median decrease in CAPI abuse score did not differ significantly by study arm (p = 0.055). CONCLUSION: The PriCARE virtual adaptation demonstrated promise in promoting positive parenting and decreasing child behavior problems.

Effectively Supporting Youth with Chronic Illness in Schools: External Partnerships and Training Recommendations.

Across Western countries, approximately 15% to 20% of school-aged children and adolescents have a health-related disorder, with incidence rates of childhood chronic health conditions (CHCs) increasing. This contribution comprehensively reviews disease-level, school-level, and systems-level issues related to effectively supporting children with CHCs succeed from both psychosocial and educational perspectives. This article also delineates training needs as they pertain to graduate preparation and/or professional development to equip school personnel to appropriately address students' needs. The article concludes with recommendations for evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies and potential avenues for interdisciplinary collaboration and models of coordinated care for these medically compromised youth.

Integrating Behavioral Health in Primary Care: Lessons from Interdisciplinary Collaboration in School Mental Health.

Integrating behavioral health care into pediatric primary care (PPC) settings can increase access to behavioral health promotion services and treatment. Efficient models for integrated PPC are emerging. Recent reviews call for integrated PPC research to better identify efficient teaming and processes, particularly in areas of building integrated PPC team member capacity and adopting practices that promote "upstream" behavioral wellness specific to community needs. Research in integrating behavioral health in schools has identified key practices relevant to these gaps in integrated primary care (IPC) research. This article discusses possibilities to apply findings from integrated school behavioral health research to IPC settings.

Associations Between Trauma Type, Timing, and Accumulation on Current Coping Behaviors in Adolescents: Results from a Large, Population-based Sample.

The development of adolescents' coping in response to stress is critical for adaptive functioning; these coping strategies may be shaped by numerous environmental factors during childhood, including experiences such as exposure to trauma. Childhood trauma has been shown to undermine contemporaneous coping, but how does a history of exposure to trauma and the characteristics of that trauma (type, timing, and accumulation) relate to current coping among adolescents? We addressed this question using a nationally-representative sample of 9427 adolescents (ages 13-18; 48.9% female; 66% White). Adolescents reported on their lifetime exposure to 18 different traumas, including witnessing or experiencing interpersonal violence, accidents, disasters, and violent or accidental loss of loved ones, as well as their current use of coping behaviors when under stress (problem-focused, positive emotion-focused, and negative emotion-focused coping strategies). The study's results highlight that exposure to nearly all forms of trauma was unrelated to problem-focused and positive emotion-focused coping behaviors, but strongly associated with increased negative emotion-focused coping. Use of each coping style did not vary with age at first exposure to trauma, but increased with the number of lifetime traumatic events experienced. The findings suggest that the extent of prior exposure to trauma, including variations across type and timing, may be related to a particular form of coping that has been linked to increased risk for mental health problems. Study results highlight coping strategies as a potential target for prevention and treatment efforts, and indicate a need to better understand the malleability and trajectory of coping responses to stress for promoting healthy youth development.