Forest Therapy as a Nature-Based Intervention: An Option for Neurological Rehabilitation?

BACKGROUND: Forest therapy demonstrates positive effects on mood, immune system, stress levels, and general well-being. Studies on depression, stress-related illnesses, sleep disorders, and arterial hypertension have provided evidence-based proof of this. SUMMARY: The aim of this review was to examine the possible effects of forest therapy with regard to its evidence in the treatment of chronic neurological diseases such as stroke in the rehabilitation phase, Parkinson's disease, dementia, and multiple sclerosis. Therefore, the electronic databases Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for such clinical trials for the years 1970 to mid-2023 without language restriction. The literature search revealed only few studies with positive indications but too few cases to be able to make generalizable evidence-based statements. In terms of improvement in the Hamilton Depression Scale analysis of two studies in stroke patients showed slight benefits in the forest therapy group (standard mean difference -0.43; 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.10; p < 0.01). One observational study revealed a higher rate of stroke survival in patients living in marked greenness. Few nature-based interventions in dementia patients showed certain benefits in particular details. KEY MESSAGES: There are no evidence-based results on the benefit of forest therapy for chronic neurological diseases. However, there are hints that forest therapy could have a positive benefit. Therefore, a proposal for forest therapy as a component of multimodal neurological rehabilitation is presented.Die Waldtherapie zeigt positive Auswirkungen auf die Stimmung, das Immunsystem, das Stressniveau und das allgemeine Wohlbefinden. Studien zu Depressionen, stressbedingten Erkrankungen, Schlafstörungen und arteriellem Bluthochdruck haben dies evidenzbasiert belegt.Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit war es, die möglichen Wirkungen der Waldtherapie im Hinblick auf ihre Evidenz bei der Behandlung chronischer neurologischer Erkrankungen wie Schlaganfall in der Rehabilitationsphase, Morbus Parkinson, Demenz und Multiple Sklerose zu untersuchen. Dazu wurden die elektronischen Datenbanken Medline, Scopus und Cochrane für die Jahre 1970 bis Mitte 2023 ohne sprachliche Einschränkung nach solchen klinischen Studien durchsucht. Die Literaturrecherche ergab nur wenige Studien mit positiven Indikationen, aber zu wenigen Fällen, um verallgemeinerbare evidenzbasierte Aussagen machen zu können. Im Hinblick auf Verbesserung in der Hamilton Depressionsskala zeigte die Analyse von 2 Studien bei Schlaganfallpatienten leichte Vorteile der Waldtherapiegruppen (Standard Mean Difference −0.43; 95% CI: -0.76- -0,10; p < 0.01). Eine Beobachtungsstudie ergab eine höhere Schlaganfall-Überlebensrate bei Patienten, die in ausgeprägtem Grün leben. Einige naturbasierte Interventionen bei Demenzpatienten zeigten in einzelnen Parametern gewisse Vorteile.Es gibt bis dato keine verallgemeinerbaren evidenzbasierten Ergebnisse zum Nutzen der Waldtherapie bei chronischen neurologischen Erkrankungen. Es gibt jedoch Hinweise, dass die Waldtherapie einen positiven Nutzen haben könnte. Es wird daher ein Vorschlag für eine Waldtherapie als Bestandteil einer multimodalen neurologischen Rehabilitation vorgestellt.

Long-Term Effects of Mountain Hiking vs. Forest Therapy on Physical and Mental Health of Couples: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lifelong physical activity is related to longer health span, which is reflected at an individual level, and is of substantial socioeconomic relevance. Sedentary lifestyles, on the other hand, pose an increasingly major public health problem. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on activity levels and well-being. Previous research indicates that contact with nature might improve exercise levels as well as well-being. METHODS: This randomized, controlled clinical trial (ANKER-study) investigated the effects of two types of nature-based therapies (forest therapy and mountain hiking) in couples (FTG: n = 23; HG: n = 22;) with a sedentary or inactive lifestyle on health-related quality of life, relationship quality and other psychological and physiological parameters. RESULTS: The results of this study displayed that healthy and highly functioning women and men with sedentary lifestyles mentally benefit from contact with nature (quality of life, satisfaction with life, mood, internal and external health-related control beliefs). The gender-specific effect on women is most visible in the physiological outcomes (hemopoietic system, aerobic capacity, skeletal muscle mass and hydration) of mountain hiking. Men and women showed small improvements in blood pressure as a result of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The ANKER-study provides a method for valid comparison of forest therapy interventions for the first time. Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, the nature-based intervention presented could offer a multimodal contribution to maintaining a more active lifestyle, further contact with nature that affects peoples physical as well as mental health, and an improvement in social interaction.

Mountain Hiking vs. Forest Therapy: A Study Protocol of Novel Types of Nature-Based Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: The global rise of urbanization has much triggered scientific interest in how nature impacts on human health. Natural environments, such as alpine landscapes, forests, or urban green spaces, are potential high-impact health resources. While there is a growing body of evidence to reveal a positive influence of these natural environments on human health and well-being, further investigations guided by rigorous evidence-based medical research are very much needed. OBJECTIVE: The present study protocol aims at testing research methodologies in the context of a prospective clinical trial on nature-based interventions. This shall improve the standards of medical research in human-nature interactions. METHODS: The ANKER Study investigates the influence of two novel types of nature-based therapy-mountain hiking and forest therapy-on physiological, psychological, and immunological parameters of couples with a sedentary lifestyle. Two intervention groups were formed and spent a seven-day holiday in Algund, Italy. The "forest therapy group" participated in daily guided low-power nature connection activities. The "hiking group", by contrast, joined in a daily moderate hiking program. Health-related quality of life and relationship quality are defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes include nature connection, balance, cardio-respiratory fitness, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, body composition and skin hydration. Furthermore, a new approach to measure health-related quality of life is validated. The so-called "intercultural quality of life" comic assesses the health-related quality of life with a digitally animated comic-based tool.