Video review using a reliable evaluation metric improves team function in high-fidelity simulated trauma resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that instruction of proper team function can occur using high-fidelity simulated trauma resuscitation with video-assisted debriefing and that this process can be integrated rapidly into a standard general surgery curriculum. DESIGN: The rater reliability of our team metric was assessed by having physicians and nonphysicians rate the same video-recorded trauma simulations at intervals in time. To assess the effectiveness of video debriefing, subjects participated in a 3-week trauma team training course that consisted of 2 video-recorded simulation sessions, each approximately 2 hours in length separated by a 90-minute debriefing session. To assess the impact of the debriefing session, video recordings of participants performing resuscitations before and after the debriefing were reviewed by a panel of blinded traumatologists and graded using our team evaluation instrument. SETTING: The study took place at the high-fidelity simulation center at a large, urban academic training hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All 11 PGY-2 general surgery and combined general surgery and plastic surgery residents at our institution. RESULTS: Our instrument was found to have high interrater correlation (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.926; 95% confidence interval, 0.893-0.953). Initially, residents were either unsure as to their competency to serve as team leader (70%) or felt they were not competent to serve as team leader (30%). Ninety percent of residents found the video debriefing very to extremely helpful in improving team function and clinical competency. All participants felt more competent as both team leaders and team members because of the video debriefing. The mean team function score improved significantly after video debriefing (4.39 [±0.3] vs 5.45 [±0.4] prevideo vs postvideo review, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Video review with debriefing is an effective means of teaching team competencies and improving team function in simulated trauma resuscitation. This strategy can be integrated readily into the surgical curriculum analogous to other applications of simulation technology.

Prehospital intravenous fluid administration is associated with higher mortality in trauma patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Prehospital intravenous (IV) fluid administration is common in trauma patients, although little evidence supports this practice. We hypothesized that trauma patients who received prehospital IV fluids have higher mortality than trauma patients who did not receive IV fluids in the prehospital setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients from the National Trauma Data Bank. Multiple logistic regression was used with mortality as the primary outcome measure. We compared patients with versus without prehospital IV fluid administration, using patient demographics, mechanism, physiologic and anatomic injury severity, and other prehospital procedures as covariates. Subset analysis was performed based on mechanism (blunt/penetrating), hypotension, immediate surgery, severe head injury, and injury severity score. RESULTS: A total of 776,734 patients were studied. Approximately half (49.3%) received prehospital IV. Overall mortality was 4.6%. Unadjusted mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving prehospital IV fluids (4.8% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients receiving IV fluids were significantly more likely to die (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05­1.17). The association was identified in nearly all subsets of trauma patients. It is especially marked in patients with penetrating mechanism (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08­1.45), hypotension (OR 1.44, 95% CI1.29­1.59), severe head injury (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17­1.54), and patients undergoing immediate surgery (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22­1.50). CONCLUSIONS: The harm associated with prehospital IV fluid administration is significant for victims of trauma. The routine use of prehospital IV fluid administration for all trauma patients should be discouraged.

Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that prehospital spine immobilization provides minimal benefit to penetrating trauma patients but takes valuable time, potentially delaying definitive trauma care. We hypothesized that penetrating trauma patients who are spine immobilized before transport have higher mortality than nonimmobilized patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of penetrating trauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (version 6.2). Multiple logistic regression was used with mortality as the primary outcome measure. We compared patients with versus without prehospital spine immobilization, using patient demographics, mechanism (stab vs. gunshot), physiologic and anatomic injury severity, and other prehospital procedures as covariates. Subset analysis was performed based on Injury Severity Score category, mechanism, and blood pressure. We calculated a number needed to treat and number needed to harm for spine immobilization. RESULTS: In total, 45,284 penetrating trauma patients were studied; 4.3% of whom underwent spine immobilization. Overall mortality was 8.1%. Unadjusted mortality was twice as high in spine-immobilized patients (14.7% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). The odds ratio of death for spine-immobilized patients was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.35-3.13) compared with nonimmobilized patients. Subset analysis showed consistent trends in all populations. Only 30 (0.01%) patients had incomplete spinal cord injury and underwent operative spine fixation. The number needed to treat with spine immobilization to potentially benefit one patient was 1,032. The number needed to harm with spine immobilization to potentially contribute to one death was 66. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital spine immobilization is associated with higher mortality in penetrating trauma and should not be routinely used in every patient with penetrating trauma.

Females have fewer complications and lower mortality following trauma than similarly injured males: a risk adjusted analysis of adults in the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: Studies of sexual dimorphism in trauma outcomes suggest that women have a survival advantage compared to equivalently injured men. It is unknown if this gender disparity is mediated by potentially life-threatening complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) if there is a sex-based differences in the odds of developing inpatient complications after trauma, and (2) if are these complications associated with death among trauma patients. METHODS: Review of adult trauma patients admitted to hospitals in the National Trauma Data Bank that report complications. Patient and injury severity covariates were adjusted using multiple logistic regression and the independent effect of sex on developing complications and associated mortality was determined. RESULTS: A total of 681,730 adult patients met the inclusion criteria of hospital admission > or =3 days. Women demonstrated a 21% lower adjusted risk of death compared to males (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.83). Females had decreased adjusted odds of developing life-threatening complications including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure and pulmonary embolism. However, when compared to males with life-threatening complications, females with complications were found to be at greater risk of dying. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that women are less likely than men to develop inpatient complications, suggesting that the survival advantage among women after traumatic injury may involve a reduced susceptibility to developing life-threatening complications.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the most common causes of nosocomial infection, morbidity, and mortality in hospitalized patients. Many patient- and disease-specific factors contribute to the pathophysiology of HAP, particularly in the surgical population. Risk-factor modification and inpatient prevention strategies can have a significant impact on the incidence of HAP. While the best diagnostic strategy remains a subject of some debate, prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy in patients suspected of having HAP has been shown to significantly decrease mortality. Because the pathogens responsible for HAP are frequently more virulent and have greater resistance to commonly used antimicrobials than other pathogens, clinicians must have knowledge of the resistance patterns at their institutions to choose appropriate therapy.

Positron-emission tomography as a prognostic tool for early-stage lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Positron-emission tomography (PET) shows tissue metabolic activity in the form of the standard uptake value (SUV). This study examines the prognostic value of the SUV for early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of 187 patients undergoing PET for potential lung cancer. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor pathology, and survival information. Data were correlated with PET results to determine if a prognostic relationship exists. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of PET for detecting malignant lesions were 98% and 24%. Malignant lesions had a higher SUV than benign lesions (5.9 +/- 6.2 versus 2.2 +/- 1.8, P < .0001). The average SUV of well-differentiated tumors was 2.6 +/- 3.1 versus 5.9 +/- 5.5 for other tumors (P = .010). There was a strong correlation between tumor stage and SUV (analysis of variance, P < .0001). There was no difference in tumor SUV for survivors versus nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: The SUV correlates with prognostic indicators, such as tumor stage and grade. The SUV alone was not an independent predictor of survival.

Epidural versus intravenous pain control in elderly patients with rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Epidural catheters are used in older patients with rib fractures to improve outcome. We reviewed the efficacy of epidural analgesia (EA) compared with intravenous narcotics (IVN) in this population. METHODS: Rib fracture patients >55 years old admitted to our level I trauma center from 1999 through 2002 were reviewed for demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Score for chest, length of stay, cardiopulmonary comorbidities, complications, and type of analgesia. RESULTS: There were 187 patients: 72 men and 115 women. The mean age was 77 years. For ISS <9, length of stay for EA patients was 12 +/- 5 days versus 5 +/- 4 days for IVN patients (P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 9 of 10 EA patients versus 21 of 52 IVN patients (P < 0.001). No difference was noted in length of stay for patients with ISS > or =9. Complications in the high ISS group occurred in 29 of 43 EA patients versus 37 of 82 IVN patients (P <0.05). Stratification of patients based on low versus high Abbreviated Injury Score for chest yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: EA is associated with prolonged length of stay and increased complications in elderly patients, particularly those with less significant injuries, regardless of cardiopulmonary comorbidities. EA for elderly patients with rib fractures should be prospectively re-evaluated.