Blood transfusion: an overused resource in colorectal cancer surgery.

The use of blood transfusion was examined in 476 patients who underwent curative surgery for large bowel cancer. Of these patients, 128 were not transfused while 348 received a total of 1174 units of blood. A patient was considered over-transfused if the predischarge haemoglobin was more than 12 g/dl. Using this criteria and accepting that single unit transfusions should be avoided, transfusion could have been avoided in 30% of the patients and a total of 377 units were given unnecessarily. Major under-transfusion did not occur; no patient being discharged with a haemoglobin of less than 9 g/dl. This study shows that blood transfusion is overused and the reasons for its use rarely recorded. In view of the morbidity related to transfusion, it is suggested that surgeons and anaesthetists reappraise their transfusion policy and the first step in this must be to record the reason for transfusion.

Surgery in a district general hospital.

All operations performed in all surgical specialties in a district general hospital over a 4-week period were monitored. Although most elective operations were performed or supervised by trained staff, the service, particularly emergency care, was heavily dependent on incompletely trained doctors. Consultants, who operated on 41% of elective cases, were more likely to perform major operations. Supervision of junior surgeons for elective surgery was considered satisfactory. Thirty-one per cent of all major cases were performed by doctors in training, usually under supervision. However, 86% of all emergency operations were performed by trainee surgeons without consultant supervision. A consultant anaesthetist or clinical assistant attended all elective operating lists and either supervised or gave the anaesthetic. However, anaesthetists in training were not usually supervised for emergency cases outside normal working hours. It is worrying that one-third of all procedures were undertaken by surgeons who had been on duty for periods in excess of 24 h.

Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital.

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were entered into a study to compare the effectiveness and safety of two single-shot antibiotic regimes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in two district general hospitals. A single shot of intravenous (IV) latamoxef disodium was as effective as an IV combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in control of wound infection following elective large bowel surgery when given as a bolus at the time of anaesthetic induction. The incidence of major wound infection was 6% and was evenly distributed in the two treatment groups. Half the major wound infections were associated with faecal fistulae. A single shot of IV antibiotic at the time of anaesthetic induction was safe, simple and an effective prophylaxis against major wound infection. There was a low incidence (1.3%) of serious postoperative bleeding and no serious adverse reactions were noted. The overall mortality was 9%. Death was significantly related to elderly patients, a poor performance status, operative contamination and wound infections.

Early diagnosis in colorectal cancer. Still no benefit?

Time to diagnosis from first symptoms has been assessed in 332 patients with colorectal cancer treated by the three general surgeons in Trafford Health Authority. When compared with other series, delay to diagnosis has been shortened, particular general practitioner and hospital delay. Fewer patients presented as emergencies and a greater proportion of patients had early-stage disease. There was no significant difference in delay times between Dukes' stage B and C patients but there was a significant difference in survival at 2 years between these two stages. Delay times for patients with risk factors, family histories or diverticular disease were not significantly different from times in patients without these factors.

Early diagnosis in colorectal cancer still no benefit?

Delay to diagnosis from first symptom has been assessed in 332 patients with colorectal cancer treated by the three general surgeons in Trafford Health Authority. Delay was divided into three parts; that due to (a) the patient, (b) the general practitioner and (c) the hospital. There was no significant difference in delay between Dukes stage B and C patients but there was a significant difference in survival at two years between these two stages. Delay for patients with risk factors as family histories or diverticular disease was not significantly different to patients without these factors. When compared to other series delay has been shortened, particularly general practitioner and hospital delay. Fewer patients presented as emergencies and a greater proportion of patients had disease at an earlier stage. However, these favourable aspects are not reflected in an improved survival at 2 years.

Ceftriaxone versus povidone iodine in preventing wound infections following biliary surgery.

The effect of either prophylactic antibiotic or wound antiseptic on bile bacteriology, wound and other postoperative sepsis has been studied in a controlled prospective randomised trial of 243 patients undergoing biliary surgery at a district general hospital. Wound infection rates were significantly less in patients given intravenous ceftriaxone (1%) at induction of anaesthesia when compared to povidone iodine sprayed into the wound at the completion of surgery (9%) (P = 0.02). In all but one patient infected wounds grew organisms identical to those cultured from the bile. There were also fewer chest and urinary infections in the ceftriaxone group but this was not statistically significant.

Who undertakes the consultations in the outpatient department?

In a study of all 4275 outpatient consultations over one month in a district general hospital it was found that the clinics in surgical specialties had the largest numbers of patients. In general surgery less than half of new patients and only one third of all patients attending the clinic were seen by a consultant. (Nine months later about a third of all new patients had still not seen a consultant in the clinic.) In the medical clinics just over a quarter of patients were seen by doctors who had less than six months' experience in their present specialty after registration. Overall, doctors had been on continuous duty for at least 24 hours before a third of consultations. Doctors in training had actually worked during the previous night before attending a quarter of the clinics. Much of the large volume of work is performed by tired, incompletely trained doctors. It is suggested that a greater proportion of the work should be performed by fully trained staff. The workload might be reduced by modifying the pattern of the consultation.