A phase II study of S-1 therapy for patients with advanced and recurrent esophageal cancer resistant or intolerable to fluorouracil, platinum, and taxane therapy (OGSG 1404).

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil (FU), platinum (PT), and taxane (TAX) therapy was the standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before the era of anti-programmed death-1 antibodies. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) ESCC resistant or intolerable to FU, PT, and TAX therapy. METHODS: Eligible patients had R/M ESCC; no prior S-1 use; were intolerant or refractory to prior FU, PT, and TAX therapy; aged ≧ 20 years; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. S-1 was administered orally from days 1 to 28, every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR) for each patient, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and December 2017, 17 patients were recruited, and the trial was terminated because of slow accrual. The DCR was 46.7%. The response rate was 13.3%. The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months. The median time to treatment failure was 1.9 months. The median overall survival was 8.4 months, and the 1 year overall survival rate was 30.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Although this trial closed early because of slow accrual, we observed modest clinical activity with S-1 in patients with R/M ESCC who could not tolerate or whose tumors were refractory to FU, PT, and TAX therapy.

Sequential Treatment Strategy Using Fluoropyrimidine plus Bevacizumab Followed by Oxaliplatin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Study (OGSG 1107).

Introduction: Previous prospective studies suggest that the sequential use of cytotoxic agents, such as oxaliplatin, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has the potential to improve prognosis and maintain quality of life than combination chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a sequential treatment strategy consisting of an initial therapy (capecitabine, S-1, or 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin [LV/5-FU] plus bevacizumab) and subsequent therapy (i.e., initial therapy plus oxaliplatin) for mCRC. Methods: The primary endpoint was second progression-free survival (2nd PFS) between the start of initial therapy and tumor progression after sequential therapy; secondary endpoints were PFS after initial treatment, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: Sixty-six patients were planned to be recruited. However, owing to a slow accrual rate, recruitment was terminated when only 19 patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2015; 4, 10, and 5 patients were administered capecitabine plus bevacizumab, S-1 plus bevacizumab, and LV/5-FU plus bevacizumab, respectively. The proportions of those with a KRAS status (wild-type/mutant/unknown) were 26%, 21%, and 53%, respectively. The median 2nd PFS and OS were 19.1 months and not reached, respectively. The ORR was 45.5% in the initial therapy and 16.7% in the subsequent therapy. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (5%), proteinuria (5%), and hypertension (47%). Conclusion: Although our data are limited and preliminary, the sequential treatment strategy may provide a survival benefit in patients with mCRC. Further investigation of this treatment approach is warranted.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy: OGSG1201.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized, selection-design phase II trial to compare docetaxel (DTX) and paclitaxel (PTX) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTX (70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or PTX (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of each 49-day cycle). The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR) and safety. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eligible patients (N = 39 in each group) were included for efficacy analysis. OS was significantly longer in the PTX group than in the DTX group (median, 8.8 versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = 0.047). A significant benefit of PTX over DTX was also apparent in PFS (median, 4.4 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.49; P = 0.002) and TTF (median, 3.8 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.45; P < 0.001). RR (25.6% versus 7.7%, P = 0.065) were higher in the PTX group than in the DTX group. Compared to the PTX group, neutropenia (28% versus 80%) and leukopenia (28% versus 76%) of grade ≥3 as well as febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 46%, P < 0.0001) occurred more frequently in the DTX group. CONCLUSION: PTX showed a significantly better efficacy as well as a more manageable toxicity compared with DTX. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000007940.

Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing neoadjuvant Adriamycin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil vs docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by surgery for esophageal cancer (OGSG1003).

AIM: The aim is to report the long-term outcomes of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) vs Adriamycin (ACF) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Previously, this trial showed that DCF is associated with prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to two cycles of ACF (35 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 7 days) every 4 weeks or DCF (70 mg/m2 of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between October 2011 and October 2013, 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled in the study, 162 of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to the two groups. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 69.8 months. The 5-year RFS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (59.9% vs 40.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.86; P = .009) and the 5-year OS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (63.5% vs 49.4%, HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96; P = .03). The benefit of DCF chemotherapy on survival was significantly greater in the subgroups with more advanced clinical T and N stage. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel are associated with better RFS and OS than ACF in resectable ESCC patients.

Retrospective Comparison of mFOLFOXIRI With XELOX/SOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) shows favorable outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), however, the optimal regimen has not been determined yet. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (mFOLFOXIRI) with capecitabine/S-1 and oxaliplatin (XELOX/SOX) in rectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients with LARC who received mFOLFOXIRI or XELOX/SOX as NAC. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and July 2019, 49 patients received mFOLFOXIRI and 37 patients received XELOX/SOX. The pathological response rates (over two-thirds affected tumor area) were 36.7% and 40.5% in the mFOLFOXIRI and XELOX/SOX groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was experienced by 45.0% of the patients in the mFOLFOXIRI group and 8.0% in the XEOX/SOX group. CONCLUSION: Although pathological responses were comparable between two groups, mFOLFOXIRI tended to be more toxic compared to XELOX/SOX as NAC for LARC.

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).

LESSONS LEARNED: A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycles and prognosis of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV. BACKGROUND: TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has shown promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the previously reported dose and schedule for the TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks) plus BEV (5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks) regimen is complicated by severe hematological toxicities and difficult administration schedules. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more convenient biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies were enrolled. Patients received biweekly TAS-102 (twice daily on days 1-5, every 2 weeks) with BEV (5mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16-w PFS rate). RESULTS: From October 2017 to January 2018, 46 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day). Of the 44 eligible patients, the 16-w PFS rate was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3%-56.8%), and the null hypothesis was rejected (p < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.29 months and 10.86 months, respectively. Disease control rate was 59.1%. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (15.9%), and leucopenia (15.9%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising antitumor activity with safety.

[A Case of Remnant Gastric Cancer Occurring 12 Years after Surgery That Was Successfully Treated with Radiation Therapy].

A 59-year-old woman had a history of distal gastrectomy and D2 dissection in May 200X for advanced gastric cancer(GC) in the antrum area. The pathological stage was poorly differentiated, T2(SS), N2, H0, P0, CY0, M0, pStage ⅢA. After administration of S-1 for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent surveillance with no recurrence. However, remnant GC was diagnosed in April 200X+12. Considering that there was no indication for curative resection due to severe invasion of the proper hepatic artery, gastrojejunostomy was performed for the anastomotic stenosis. Although the patient was administered 3 courses of S-1 plus oxaliplatin therapy as first-line treatment, partial response was not achieved. Therefore, chemoradiotherapy(CRT)with capecitabine was administered for local tumor control. Complete response was achieved, and the patient underwent surveillance with no recurrence 16 months after the recurrence. There were no serious acute adverse events(AEs)during CRT and late AEs after CRT. The patient was successfully treated with CRT for locally advanced remnant GC. Although there is no standard treatment for locally advanced remnant GC, this case showed the effectiveness of CRT.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Gastric Cancer before Gastrectomy Might be as Useful as Histological Assessment after Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is expected to improve prognoses. However, as there is no method to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy before gastrectomy, some patients at high risk for a poor prognosis undergo gastrectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether endoscopy could be useful for assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 41 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy at our institution to investigate whether responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as assessed with endoscopy, can serve as a surrogate marker for histological grades 1b or higher in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC) scheme. RESULTS: There were 32 (78.0%) responders and 9 (22.0%) nonresponders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as observed in endoscopic evaluations. Among the endoscopic responders, 24 (75.0%) had cancer of histological grade 1b or higher, and 15 (46.9%) had cancer of grade 2 or higher. Among the endoscopic nonresponders, 1 (11.1%) patient had histological grade 1b cancer. Compared with endoscopic nonresponders, endoscopic responders were more likely to show a histological response (chi-square test: p = 0.0005 for JCGC grade 1b or higher; p = 0.0099 for JCGC grade 2 or higher). CONCLUSIONS: Most endoscopic responders showed JCGC histological responses. Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy by endoscopy in gastric cancer may be useful before gastrectomy. As this was a retrospective study, further investigations are required. The protocol was approved by the ethics review committee at Osaka Medical College (No. 2422) and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000033088).

A 3-Year Overall Survival Update From a Phase 2 Study of Chemoselection With DCF and Subsequent Conversion Surgery for Locally Advanced Unresectable Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter phase 2 trial analysed chemoselection with docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (DCF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) for locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer. This study presents updated 3-year analyses to further characterize the impact of DCF-ICT followed by CS. METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients with clinical T4 disease, unresectable supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, or both were eligible for this study. The treatment starts with DCF-ICT, followed by CS if the cancer is resectable, or by concurrent chemoradiation if it is not resectable. This updated analysis presents 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and pattern of relapse. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the patients surviving without death was 39.3 months. The estimated 1-year OS was 66.7%, and the lower limit of the 80% confidence interval (CI) was 54.6%. The estimated 3-year OS was 46.6% (95% CI 34.2-63.5%). The OS for the patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 19) was significantly longer than for those who did not (3-year OS: 71.4% vs. 30.1%). The estimated 1-year PFS was 50.6%, and the 3-year PFS was 39.6%. The PFS for R0 was significantly longer than for non-R0 (3-year PFS: 61.3% vs 25.0%). Recurrence or progression at the primary site was observed in 31% of the non-R0 group. The rate of distant metastasis did not differ significantly between the non-R0 and R0 groups (21% vs 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up evaluation confirmed that DCF chemoselection aimed at CS is feasible and promising in terms of survival for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced intestinal mucosal injury is associated with the severity of chemotherapy-related diarrhea.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the fluoropyrimidines are effective chemotherapeutic agents for malignant gastrointestinal tumors, they sometimes cause enteritis with diarrhea. Severe treatment-related diarrhea may result in chemotherapy discontinuation. We investigated the relationship between diarrhea severity and fluoropyrimidine-induced small intestinal mucosal injury. METHODS: We performed small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients undergoing chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine for a malignant tumor between May 2017 and June 2018 and analyzed the relationship between the endoscopic findings and diarrhea severity. We also performed a cross-sectional analysis of patient factors and routes of chemotherapy to identify risk factors of fluoropyrimidine-induced small intestinal injury. RESULTS: Small bowel capsule endoscopy was successfully completed in 16 eligible patients. The diarrhea grade (per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) was significantly correlated with the percentage of patients with a small intestinal mucosal break (grade 0, 16.7%; grade 1, 57.1%; grade 2, 100%; p = .016, Cochran-Armitage trend test). Compared to patients receiving intravenous therapy, those receiving an orally administered fluoropyrimidine had a significantly greater number of small intestinal mucosal breaks (median number of breaks [range]; intravenous 5-fluorouracil, 0 [0-13]; oral fluoropyrimidine, 6.5 [1-20]; p = .0162, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with diarrhea caused by chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine had small intestinal mucosal breaks. Additionally, small intestinal mucosal breaks were more severe in patients receiving a regimen of oral treatment than in those receiving a regimen of intravenous therapy. These outcomes have important implications for investigations of new strategies for preventing anti-cancer drug-induced diarrhea.

Impact of modified FOLFOX-6 for patients with gastric cancer and a gastrointestinal obstruction.

AIM: Gastric cancer patients are normally treated with oral fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin or oxaliplatin; however, treating patients who also have a gastrointestinal obstruction is often difficult because of their poor oral intake. Instead, a modified (m)FOLFOX-6 regimen is administered, even to patients with gastrointestinal obstructions. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of mFOLFOX-6 for gastric cancer patients with a gastrointestinal obstruction. METHODS: Patients with a poor oral intake because of a gastrointestinal obstruction who received mFOLFOX-6 as systemic chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Poor oral intake was defined as receiving a daily intravenous drip infusion due to a gastrointestinal obstruction. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received mFOLFOX-6; the median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-9.7), the median overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-20.8) and the median time to treatment failure was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.2-5.7). An improved oral intake was observed in 13 of the 18 treated patients, with 12 of these continuing treatment as outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: A mFOLFOX-6 treatment regimen seems promising for gastric cancer patients who have a gastrointestinal obstruction.

Phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy and subsequent conversion surgery for locally advanced unresectable oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oesophagus is chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF-RT). This multicentre phase II trial assessed the safety and efficacy of chemoselection with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) for initially unresectable locally advanced SCC of the oesophagus. METHODS: Patients with clinical T4 and/or unresectable supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were eligible. Treatment started with three cycles of DCF-ICT, followed by CS if resectable, or by CF-RT if unresectable. The resectability was re-evaluated at 30-40 Gy of CF-RT, followed by CS if resectable, or by completion of 60 Gy of CF-RT. If resectable after CF-RT, CS was performed. The primary end point was 1-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From April 2013 to July 2014, 48 patients were enrolled. CS was performed in 41.7% (n=20), including DCF-CS (n=18), DCF-CF-RT40Gy-CS (n=1), and DCF-CF-RT60Gy-CS (n=1). R0 resection was confirmed in 19 patients (39.6%). Grade ⩾3 postoperative complications included one event each of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, lung infection, wound infection, pulmonary fistula, and dysphagia; but no serious postoperative complications were observed in patients undergoing CS. Clinical complete response after CF-RT was confirmed in 4 patients (8.3%). The estimated 1-year OS was 67.9% and lower limit of 80% confidence interval was 59.7%. There was one treatment-related death in patient receiving DCF-CF-RT60Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoselection with DCF-ICT followed by CS as a multidisciplinary treatment strategy showed promising signs of tolerability and efficacy in patients with locally advanced unresectable SCC of the oesophagus.

A prospective, multicenter phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Standard care for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but survival remains limited. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) has demonstrated promising activity, with a pathological complete response (CR) of 17 % for resectable stage II/III ESCC. Here, we conducted a multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included clinical T4 and/or M1 lymph node ESCC, PS 0-1 and age 20-70 years. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on days 64 and 92, and fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2) on days 64-67 and 92-95, concurrently with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week). Primary endpoint of the phase II part was CR rate. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 88 %. Thirteen patients (39.4 %) achieved a CR. With a median follow-up period of 41 months (range 24-49 months), median progression-free survival was 12.2 months, and median survival was 26.0 months, with a survival rate of 40.4 % at 3 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia and dysphagia. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT is tolerable and shows promising efficacy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Efficacy of Prophylactic G-CSF in Patients Receiving FOLFIRINOX: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines have adopted an incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) threshold of 20% for the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In a Japanese phase II study of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) for Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the incidence of FN and severe neutropenia were 24.7% and 77.8%, respectively, without G-CSF prophylaxis. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of FN or severe neutropenia induced by full-dose FOLFIRINOX administration with G-CSF prophylaxis during the first cycle of treatment. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX with G-CSF prophylaxis during the first cycle of treatment from January 2014 to August 2014 were investigated and the frequency of adverse events during the first cycle was measured. RESULTS: Among seven patients who received FOLFIRINOX, six patients met the eligibility criteria. The patient characteristics were as follows: median age (range), 57 (50-66); men/women, 3/3; performance status 0/1, 2/4. Grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were as follows: leukopenia in 33% of the patients, neutropenia in 33% of the patients, thrombocytopenia in 33% of the patients and FN in 17% of the patients. One patient was heterozygous for the UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms and experienced FN. Grade3/4 non-hematological adverse events were as follows: anorexia in 33% of the cases and nausea in 50% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Although the present study was retrospective and small, the simultaneous administration of G-CSF might be effective for the prevention of severe neutropenia and FN in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX.

[A Case of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma for Which Irinotecan and Cisplatin Combination Therapy Was Effective].

A 72-year-old previously healthy man visited our hospital with complaints of hoarseness and dysphagia. Computed tomography showed wall thickening of the thoracic esophagus; invasion to the left main bronchus, aorta, and right supraclavicular lymph nodes (LNs); right recurrent nerve LNs; and cardiac LN swelling. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an elevated tumor in the middle thoracic esophagus, which was similar to a submucosal tumor and had a longitudinal ulcer at its center. Pathologicexamination showed a tumor with a high N/C ratio, and immunohistochemical staining showed the tumor was CD56 and NSE positive, with a Ki-67 index >80%. We diagnosed esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), cT4N3M0, Stage IVa. We started chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin (IP therapy) according to a regimen for small-cell lung cancer. After 3 courses of chemotherapy, the primary lesion and the LN swelling had almost disappeared. Esophageal NEC is relatively rare disease, so there are no standard established treatments. We report a case of esophageal NEC for which IP therapy was effective with the relevant literature cited.

A randomized controlled Phase III trial comparing 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (2-weekly DCF) with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer: rationale, design and methods of Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1314 (MIRACLE study).

Chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil is the current standard treatment for metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer. We have developed a 2-weekly docetaxel combined with CF regimen and conducted a Phase I/II trial for metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer (JCOG0807). Promising efficacy and safety were shown in JCOG0807, and we have commenced a Phase III trial in September 2014 to confirm the superiority of 2-weekly DCF to CF for patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer. A total of 240 patients will be accrued from 41 Japanese institutions over a period of 4 years. The primary end point is overall survival. The secondary end points are progression-free survival, response rate and proportion of adverse events. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000015107 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Phase I/II trial of 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer (JCOG0807).

We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2-weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2-weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2-weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m(2) [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m(2) [DL2] with a 3 + 3 design in phase I, on days 1 and 15) in combination with fixed-dose CF (80 mg/m(2) cisplatin, day 1; 800 mg/m(2) fluorouracil, days 1-5) repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in phase I and central peer review-based response rate in phase II. At least 22 responders among 50 patients were required to satisfy the primary endpoint with a threshold of 35%. Sixty-two patients were enrolled in phase I and II. In phase I, 10 patients were enrolled with DLT of 0/3 at DL1 and 2/7 in DL2. Considering DLT and treatment compliance, the recommended phase II dose was determined as DL1. In phase II, the response rate was 62% (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 48-75%); median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.1 and 5.8 months, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), anemia (36%), hyponatremia (29%), anorexia (24%), and nausea (11%). No febrile neutropenia was observed. Pneumonitis caused treatment-related death in one patient. The 2-weekly DCF regimen showed promising antimetastatic activity and tolerability. A phase III study comparing this regimen with CF therapy is planned by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001737.

Retrospective study as first-line chemotherapy combined anti-VEGF antibody with fluoropyrimidine for frail patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Combination chemotherapies of oxaliplatin or irinotecan with fluoropyrimidine and molecular target drug were reported to be active in several clinical studies and so regarded as a first-line standard therapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the incidence of adverse events is not so low. We investigated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with fluoropyrimidine as a first-line treatment for frail patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with first-line chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with S-1 or 5FU/LV (modified Roswell Park Memorial Institute regimen) at our hospital between October 2007 and December 2010 were retrospectively investigated. RESULTS: The median age was 72 years (range 66-84). Performance status was 0, 1 and 2 in 8, 17 and 1 patient, respectively. The primary lesion was located in the colon in 14 patients and in the rectum in 12. Twenty patients were with resection of the primary lesion and 6 were without, 8 were with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and 18 were without. The number of metastasized organs was 1, 2 and 3 in 17, 9 and 0 patients, respectively. The liver, lung, lymph node and peritoneum were metastasized in 9, 9, 11 and 5 patients, respectively. The KRAS gene was wild in 11, mutated in 7 and unknown in 8 patients. Bevacizumab with S-1 was used in 17 patients and bevacizumab with 5FU/LV was used in 9. Response and disease control rates were 50 and 100%, respectively. The median duration of progression-free survival was 9.1 months and the median time to treatment failure was 9.0 months. The incidences of all grades of neutropenia and hypertension were 31%, those of grade 3 or severer were 12%, and those of other adverse events were low. Grade 3 cerebral hemorrhage, grade 4 pulmonary embolism and grade 5 febrile neutropenia each occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The first-line chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with fluoropyrimidine for frail patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan was comparable to the safety and efficacy of combination therapy reported previously in Western countries.

[Comparison of chemotherapy side effects between elderly and young subjects].

UNLABELLED: With the aging of society, the number of elderly patients receiving chemotherapy has increased. Since organ function, particularly the liver and kidney function, is known to decrease with age, there is concern that severe side effects may develop in the elderly because of chemotherapy. It is a considerable challenge to establish safe, effective chemotherapy that enables elderly patients to maintain a favorable QOL. Therefore, we conducted a survey of the current status of chemotherapy side effects. METHODS: The subjects were patients enrolled in physician-led clinical trials between April 2006 and December 2010. A survey of the chemotherapy regimens used, PS, and, side effects(CTC-AE v3.0)was conducted to examine differences in the incidence and Grade of side effects between elderly and younger subjects(aged 65 years or older, and younger than 65 years, respectively). The subjects consisted of9 3 elderly and younger people, with mean ages of 70 and 59. 5 years, respectively. Myelosuppression of Grade 3, or more severe side effects in the elderly and younger subjects, was 22. 5% and 16. 3%, respectively. The incidence of side effects was slightly higher in the elderly than in the younger subjects. In general clinical practice, side effects are controlled by selecting regimens and adjusting doses for the elderly. However, in clinical trials in which the dosage is predetermined regardless of age, the elderly are more prone to develop side effects than young people. We compare and present the current status regarding the side effects, effectiveness, and contents of chemotherapy regimens.

[Chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients].

Since elderly people have decreased renal function along with increased risks for complications of cardiac disorders such as hypertension and decreased physical strength, compared to in younger people, drug therapy for them is associated more with concern about drug-related toxicity. Therefore, dose reduction or discontinuation of drug administration is sometimes considered during earlier stages of therapy. On the other hand, there are some reports suggesting that as long as proper organ function is maintained, the elderly can be treated in the same way as younger people. However, given limited information and depending on the therapeutic goal of each patient, it should be carefully considered whether the same medicinal strategy used for younger patients is appropriate for treating elderly patients or not.