Purchase of contact lenses and contact-lenses-related symptoms following the Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study.

BACKGROUND: The rate and reasons for discontinuation of contact lens wear by young patients are not well known. The Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study surveyed participants 3 months after the final study visit to determine the percentage of participants who continued to wear contact lenses after study conclusion. The factors associated with continued contact lens wear and differences in behaviors between the children and teens were also determined to provide insights to practitioners who provide refractive correction for patients in those age groups. METHODS: Three months after the CLIP Study completion, participants and parents returned mailed surveys that assessed post-study lens purchase and symptoms related to contact lens wear if contact lenses wear had been continued. Responses were compared between the children and teens using chi(2) or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Almost 92% of the surveys were returned. Eighty percent of teens' parents reported purchasing lenses after the study, vs. 63% of the children's parents (p=0.02). Symptoms reported at the last study visit were not significantly associated with future purchase, though there was a trend towards more light sensitivity in those who did not purchase more contact lenses (23.1% vs. 11.8%). Satisfaction with contact lenses was high among both those purchasing additional contact lenses and those who did not. Both children and teens reported similar frequencies of symptoms such as burning, itching or tearing eyes 3 months following study completion. Teens reported having contact-lens-related dry eyes more frequently than children. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of children and an even higher proportion of teens continued wearing their lenses 3 months after completing the CLIP Study. Children and teens reported similar contact lens comfort and low frequencies of most symptoms, though teens experienced more dry-eye symptoms. Overall, reports of symptoms in this sample were lower than had been reported in adult populations by other investigators.

Benefits of contact lens wear for children and teens.

PURPOSE: Children are not offered elective contact lenses as a treatment option for refractive error nearly as often as teens are. The purpose of this report was to examine the benefits of contact lens wear for children and teens to determine whether children benefit as much as teens. If they do, children should routinely be offered contact lens wear as a treatment for refractive error. METHODS: Neophyte contact lens wearers were categorized as children (8-12 years of age) or teens (13-17 years of age). They completed the Pediatric Refractive Error Profile (PREP), a pediatric quality-of-life survey for subjects affected only by refractive error, while wearing glasses; then they were fitted with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. One week, 1 month, and 3 months after receiving contact lenses, the subjects completed the same PREP survey. Subjects also completed questions regarding wearing time and satisfaction with contact lenses during specific activities. RESULTS: The study enrolled 169 subjects at three clinical centers. Ninety-three (55%) of the subjects were girls; 78 (46%) were white; and 44 (26%) were Hispanic. After wearing contact lenses for 3 months, the overall PREP score increased from 64.4 for children and 61.8 for teens while wearing glasses to 79.2 for children and 76.5 for teens. The improvement from baseline to 3 months was significant for children and teens (P<0.0001 for both groups), but there was not a significant difference in improvement between children and teens (P>0.05). The areas of most improvement were satisfaction with correction, activities, and appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lenses significantly improved the quality of life, as reported by children and teens using the PREP, and there was not a difference in improvement between children and teens. Contact lens wear dramatically improves how children and teens feel about their appearance and participation in activities, leading to greater satisfaction with their refractive error correction. The improvement in quality of life after contact lens wear indicates that children should be offered contact lenses as a treatment for refractive error as routinely as teens.

Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study: chair time and ocular health.

PURPOSE: Despite several studies that show 8- to 11-year-old children are capable of wearing a various contact lens modalities, parents often report that their eye care practitioner would not fit their child with contact lenses until the child was about 13 years old. We conducted the Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study to compare contact lens fitting and follow-up between 8- to 12-year-old children and 13- to 17-year-old teenagers. METHODS: At the baseline visit, all subjects underwent a contact lens fitting, including visual acuity, a manifest refraction, autorefraction, and biomicroscopy. Subjects then underwent contact lens insertion and removal training, which consisted of talking about contact lens care as well as inserting and removing a contact lens three times. Subjects returned for follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, and visual acuity, contact lens fit assessment, and biomicroscopy were performed. The time of the fitting, the insertion and removal training, and each follow-up visit were measured individually and added for a total chair time. Biomicroscopy examinations were conducted according to a standardized protocol. RESULTS: We enrolled 84 children and 85 teens in the study. Of the 169 subjects, 93 (55.0%) were female, 78 (46.2%) were white, 44 (23.3%) were Hispanic, and 28 (17.6%) were black. The mean (+/- SD) total chair time for children was 110.6 +/- 39.2 min, significantly more than 95.3 +/- 25.2 min for teens (Student's t-test, p = 0.003). Most of the difference was caused by insertion and removal training, which lasted 41.9 +/- 32.0 min for children and 30.3 +/- 20.2 min for teens (Student's t-test, p = 0.01). The presence of conjunctival staining increased from 7.1% of the subjects at baseline to 19.9% of the subjects at 3 months (chi2, p = 0.0006), but the changes were similar between children and teens. No other biomicroscopy signs increased significantly over the 3-month period. CONCLUSIONS: The total chair time for children is approximately 15 min longer than teens, but most of that difference is explained by longer time spent teaching children insertion and removal. Because insertion and removal is generally taught by staff members, the eye care practitioner's time with the patient is similar between children and teens. Furthermore, neither children nor teens experienced problems related to contact lens wear during the study. Eye care practitioners should consider routinely offering contact lenses as a treatment option, even for children 8 years old.