The school-to-prison pipeline for probation youth with special education needs.

Juvenile justice-involved youth with special education eligibility may have distinct needs from other justice-involved youth that place them at higher risk of re-offending. This study examines the extent to which the comorbidity of risk factors, such as school challenges and mental and emotional health problems, is related to recidivism among probation youth with a diagnosis eligible for special education. Data came from the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment provided to 4,317 youth adjudicated to probation for at least 3 months. We used independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests to assess the difference in mental health and school problems (e.g., suspension/expulsion history) between those with and without special education needs. Multiple regression models estimated the unique and cumulative role of special education status, mental health, and school problems in future recidivism. In the study sample, 39.6% (n = 1,708) of the youth had diagnoses eligible for special education; over 42% of these youth had two or more qualifying diagnoses. Controlling for demographics, mental health, and self-regulation skills, our findings suggest that probation youth with special education needs, compared to the rest of the probation youth, were more likely to recidivate. School exclusion increased the number of recidivisms significantly more for justice-involved youth with special education needs than those without special education needs. The findings of the study illuminate important factors for continued justice-involvement as well as insights into service and treatment planning for youth serving probation in the community, especially for those who are eligible for special education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Lessons Learned: Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Family-Based Intervention Research in Juvenile Justice Settings.

Greater than 60% of youths in the juvenile justice system have a diagnosable mental health disorder, with substance use-related and addictive disorders being among the most common mental health disorders.1 Research studies have shown that family-based interventions targeting substance use-related and addictive disorders have two to nine times greater effect sizes compared with individual-based interventions.2 Family-based interventions, most notably, functional family therapy,3 multidimensional family therapy,4 and multisystemic therapy,5 have been shown to reduce substance use among justice-involved youths. Given the complex and multiple demands facing justice-involved youths, conducting family-based research within juvenile justice populations can be challenging. This article provides insights into the operational challenges and innovative strategies to address these challenges to conduct family-based intervention research with reentry youths.