Rectourethral fistula following SpaceOAR gel placement for prostate cancer radiotherapy: A rare complication.

After undergoing a SpaceOAR® gel placement prior to planned radiotherapy for Gleason 4 + 4 prostate cancer, a 70-year-old male experienced severe right buttock pain and urine passing from his rectum. A colonoscopy and follow-up pelvic MRI demonstrated a large rectourethral fistula. The fistula was treated surgically with a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, primary rectal repair, omental flap and diverting loop ileostomy. Pathology demonstrated extensive treatment effect with no residual prostate cancer. This is the first case study of a rectourethral fistula attributable to SpaceOAR® gel placement.

Establishment of genetically diverse patient-derived xenografts of colorectal cancer.

Preclinical compounds tested in animal models often show limited efficacy when transitioned into human clinical trials. As a result, many patients are stratified into treatment regimens that have little impact on their disease. In order to create preclinical models that can more accurately predict tumor responses, we established patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of colorectal cancer (CRC). Surgically resected tumor specimens from colorectal cancer patients were implanted subcutaneously into athymic nude mice. Following successful establishment, fourteen models underwent further evaluation to determine whether these models exhibit heterogeneity, both at the cellular and genetic level. Histological review revealed properties not found in CRC cell lines, most notably in overall architecture (predominantly columnar epithelium with evidence of gland formation) and the presence of mucin-producing cells. Custom CRC gene panels identified somatic driver mutations in each model, and therapeutic efficacy studies in tumor-bearing mice were designed to determine how models with known mutations respond to PI3K, mTOR, or MAPK inhibitors. Interestingly, MAPK pathway inhibition drove tumor responses across most models tested. Noteworthy, the MAPK inhibitor PD0325901 alone did not significantly mediate tumor response in the context of a KRAS(G12D) model, and improved tumor responses resulted when combined with mTOR inhibition. As a result, these genetically diverse models represent a valuable resource for preclinical efficacy and drug discovery studies.

Minimally invasive colorectal resection is associated with a transient increase in plasma hepatocyte growth factor levels early after surgery for colon cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery's impact on blood levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a potent angiogenic factor, is unknown. Preoperative (PreOp) HGF blood levels are elevated in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and correlate with disease stage and prognosis. This study's purpose was to determine plasma HGF levels after minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) in patients with CRC. METHODS: Clinical and operative data were collected. Blood samples were obtained in all patients PreOp and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3; in some, samples were taken during weeks 2 and 3 after MICR. Late samples were bundled into 7-day time blocks. HGF levels were determined via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in duplicate. Student's t test was used to analyze the data (significance, P < .0125 after Bonferroni correction). RESULTS: A total of 28 CRC patients who underwent MICR were studied. Most had right, sigmoid, or left segmental colectomy. The mean plasma HGF level was higher on POD 1 (2417 ± 1476 pg/mL, P < .001) and POD 3 (2081 ± 1048 pg/mL, P < .001) when compared with PreOp levels (1045 ± 406 pg/mL). Plasma levels were back to baseline by the second (1100 ± 474 pg/mL, P = .64) and third postoperative weeks (1010 ± 327 pg/mL, P = .51). CONCLUSION: MICR for CRC is associated with a 1.9- to 2.3-fold increase in plasma HGF levels during the first 3 PODs after which levels normalize. This transient increase may briefly promote angiogenesis and the growth of residual tumor cells.

Minimally invasive colorectal resection for cancer is associated with a short-lived decrease in soluble Tie-2 receptor levels, which may transiently inhibit VEGF-mediated angiogenesis (via altered blood levels of free Ang-1 and Ang-2).

BACKGROUND: Angiopoetin- (Ang-) 1 inhibits and Ang-2 promotes VEGF-mediated angiogenesis via binding to endothelial cell-bound Tie-2 receptor (Tie-2). After minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR), Ang-1 levels decrease and Ang-2 levels increase, which may stimulate angiogenesis in wounds and residual tumor foci. Soluble Tie-2 (sTie-2) modulates the effects of free Ang-1 and Ang-2 by binding to them. This study assessed perioperative MICR plasma sTie-2 levels. METHODS: Blood samples were taken preoperatively (PreOp) and on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 from 50 cancer and 53 benign disease MICR patients. In a subgroup, a fourth sample was taken between POD7 and POD13 and bundled as a single time point. sTie-2 levels (ng/ml) were determined via ELISA. The mean and SD were determined at each time point. The t test used for analysis. RESULTS: PreOp plasma sTie-2 levels were significantly higher in the benign group (27.6 ± 10.2) than in the cancer group (22.9 ± 7.9). A significant drop from PreOp occurred in sTie-2 levels in the cancer group on POD1 (20.0 ± 7.4) and POD3 (21.0 ± 6.6) and in the benign group on POD1 (24.8 ± 9.1). The benign group's POD3 and the cancer group's POD7-13 sTie-2 levels were statistically similar to the PreOp levels while the benign group's POD7-13 level was significantly higher. CONCLUSION: PreOp sTie-2 levels were significantly lower in cancer patients. MICR is associated with a significant short-lived decrease in plasma sTie-2 levels in cancer patients on POD1 and 3, which may briefly inhibit VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. The benign group's early results were similar.

Colonoscopy in the office setting is safe, and financially sound ... for now.

PURPOSE: In 2000, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a plan to allow for enhanced reimbursement for office endoscopy. This change in reimbursement was phased in during three years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fiscal outcomes and quality measures in the first two and a one-half years of performing endoscopy in an office setting under the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines. METHODS: The following financial parameters were gathered: number of endoscopies, expenses (divided into salaries and operational), net revenue, and margin for endoscopies performed in the office compared with the hospital. All endoscopies were performed by endoscopists with advanced training (gastroenterology fellowship or colon and rectal surgery residency). Monitoring equipment included continuous SaO2 and automated blood pressure in all patients and continuous electrocardiographic monitors in selected patients. Quality/safety data have been tracked in a prospective manner and include number of transfers to the hospital, perforations, bleeding requiring transfusion or hospitalization, and cardiorespiratory arrest. RESULTS: The financial outcomes are as follows: 13,285 endoscopies performed from the opening of the unit through December 2003; net revenue per case $504 per case; expense per case has dropped from $205 per case to $145 per case; the overall financial benefit of performing endoscopy in the office compared with the hospital was an additional $28 to $143 per case depending on the insurance carrier. The quality outcomes since inception of the unit include the following: 13,285 endoscopies; 0 hospital transfers, 0 cardiorespiratory arrests; 0 perforations; and 1 bleeding episode that required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy performed in the office setting is safe when done with appropriate monitoring and in the proper patient population. At the time of this study, office endoscopy also is financially rewarding but changes in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement threaten the ability to retain any financial benefit.

Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Standards Committee is composed of Society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all of the circumstances presented by the individual patient.