Fibrosing colonopathy associated with cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules in cystinosis patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this report is to identify and characterize cases of fibrosing colonopathy, a rare and underrecognized adverse event, associated with cysteamine delayed-release (DR) in patients with nephropathic cystinosis. METHODS: We searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the medical literature for postmarketing reports of fibrosing colonopathy associated with cysteamine through August 2, 2023. RESULTS: We identified four cases of fibrosing colonopathy reported with the use of cysteamine DR. The time to onset ranged from 12 to 31 months. In one case, the patient required surgery to have a resection of a section of the strictured colon and a diverting ileostomy. Fibrosing colonopathy was diagnosed by histopathology in two of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series identified the risk of fibrosing colonopathy in patients taking cysteamine DR and prompted regulatory action by the FDA. As outlined in changes to the U.S. prescribing information for cysteamine DR, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential risk of fibrosing colonopathy with cysteamine DR, especially as symptoms can be non-specific leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. If the diagnosis of fibrosing colonopathy is confirmed, consideration should be given to permanently discontinuing cysteamine DR and switching to cysteamine immediate-release treatment.

Assessing the risk of intentional self-harm in montelukast users: an updated Sentinel System analysis using ICD-10 coding.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast prescribing information includes a Boxed Warning issued in March 2020 regarding neuropsychiatric adverse events. A previous Sentinel System study of asthma patients from 2000 to 2015 did not demonstrate an increased risk of intentional self-harm measured using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, with montelukast compared to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). METHODS: Using a new user cohort study design, we examined intentional self-harm events in patients aged 10 years and older who were incident users of either montelukast or ICS as monotherapy, with a diagnosis of asthma, between October 1, 2015, to June 30, 2022, in the Sentinel System. We measured intentional self-harm using ICD-10-CM codes, which may have better accuracy for capturing suicide attempts than ICD-9-CM codes. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline covariates. We performed subgroup analyses by age group, sex, psychiatric history, and pre/post Boxed Warning era and conducted sensitivity analyses varying type of care setting of the outcome and exposure episode gaps. RESULTS: Among 752,230 and 724,855 patients in the montelukast and ICS exposure groups respectively, we found no association between montelukast use and self-harm compared to ICS use [Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval): 0.96 (0.85, 1.08)]. This finding was consistent across all subgroups, and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our results cannot exclude other neuropsychiatric idiosyncratic reactions to montelukast. Compared to the previous Sentinel study, this study identified about double the rate of self-harm events, suggesting a greater sensitivity of ICD-10 codes for measuring self-harm than ICD-9.

Assessment of the Impact of Mandated Postmarketing Pediatric-Focused Safety Reviews on Safety-Related Regulatory Actions 2013-2019.

The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) routine postmarketing drug safety monitoring may lead to safety-related labeling changes for identified risks. Additionally, the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) and Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) require the FDA to conduct postmarket pediatric-focused safety reviews of adverse events. The purpose of these pediatric reviews is to identify risks associated with drug or biological products 18 months after the FDA approves a pediatric labeling change pursuant to studies conducted under the BPCA or PREA. These reviews are presented to the FDA Pediatric Advisory Committee (PAC) or publicly posted on FDA's website. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pediatric reviews prompted by BPCA/PREA from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2019. The impact was quantified by the number of new safety signals identified and the subsequent safety-related labeling changes resulting from pediatric reviews relative to safety-related labeling changes triggered by other data sources. Among 163 products with at least one pediatric review completed, a new safety signal that resulted in a safety-related labeling change was found for 5 of these products (representing 3 active ingredients); none described risks specific to the pediatric population. Between October 2013 and September 2021, there were 585 safety-related labeling changes implemented for products with at least one completed pediatric review. Less than 1% of 585 safety-related labeling changes were the result of a mandated pediatric review. Our study suggests that mandated pediatric reviews conducted 18 months after a pediatric labeling change provided minimal value over other postmarket safety surveillance activities.

Benzonatate Exposure Trends and Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adverse events (AE), including death, occur in children with benzonatate use. This study aims to understand recent trends in benzonatate exposure and clinical consequences in pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of data from IQVIA pharmacy drug dispensing, National Poison Data System, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance Project, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, and the medical literature evaluated exposure trends and medication-related AEs with benzonatate. Trends for comparator narcotic and nonnarcotic antitussive medications were analyzed where possible for context. RESULTS: During the study period, pediatric benzonatate prescription utilization increased but remained low compared with pediatric utilization of dextromethorphan-containing prescription antitussive medications. Among the 4689 pediatric benzonatate exposure cases reported to US poison control centers from 2010 to 2018, 3727 cases (80%) were for single-substance exposures. Of these, 3590 cases (77%) were unintentional exposures and most involved children 0 to 5 years old (2718 cases, 83%). Cases involving intentional benzonatate exposure increased among children 10 to 16 years old with a more pronounced increase for multiple-substance exposures. Most benzonatate cases involving misuse or abuse were for children 10 to 16 years old (59 cases, 61%). The proportion of cases with serious adverse effects was low. There were few cases annually of serious AEs with benzonatate in children. CONCLUSIONS: There were rising patterns of unintentional ingestion of benzonatate in children 0 to 5 years old and intentional benzonatate ingestion in children 10 to 16 years old. Rational prescribing and improved provider and caregiver awareness of benzonatate toxic effects may reduce risks associated with benzonatate exposure.

The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perspectives of neonatologists, neonatal nurses, and parents on research-related education and communication practices in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaire circulated through interest groups and administered using the internet. RESULTS: 323 respondents responded to the survey. 52 were neonatologists, 188 were neonatal nurses, and 83 were parents of NICU graduates. Analysis was descriptive. Differences were noted between stakeholder groups with respect to whether current medications meet the needs of sick neonates, research as central to the mission of the NICU, availability of appropriate education/training for all members of the research team, and adequacy of information provided to parents before, during, and after a research study is completed. CONCLUSION: Engagement of nurses and parents at all stages of NICU research is currently suboptimal; relevant good practices, including education, should be shared among neonatal units.

Leveraging Case Narratives to Enhance Patient Age Ascertainment from Adverse Event Reports.

INTRODUCTION: Missing age presents a significant challenge when evaluating individual case safety reports (ICSRs) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). When age is missing in an ICSR's structured field, it may be in the report's free-text narrative. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the performance and assess the potential impact of a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) tool that utilizes a text string search to identify patients' numerical age from unstructured narratives. METHODS: Using FAERS ICSRs from 2002 to 2018, we evaluated the annual proportion of ICSRs with age missing in the structured field before and after NLP application. Reviewers manually identified patients' age from ICSR narratives (gold standard) from a random sample of 1500 ICSRs. The gold standard was compared to the NLP-identified age. RESULTS: During the study period, the percentage of ICSRs missing age in the structured field increased from 21.9 to 43.8%. The NLP tool performed well among the random sample: sensitivity 98.5%, specificity 92.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 94.9%, and F-measure 96.7%. It also performed well for the subset of ICSRs missing age in the structured field; when applied to these cases, NLP identified age for an additional one million ICSRs (10% of the total number of ICSRs from 2002 to 2018) and decreased the percentage of ICSRs missing age to 27% overall. CONCLUSIONS: NLP has potential utility to extract patients' age from ICSR narratives. Use of this tool would enhance pharmacovigilance and research using FAERS data.

Risk of Psychiatric Adverse Events Among Montelukast Users.

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results from observational studies regarding the risk of psychiatric adverse events (PAEs) with montelukast use. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are associations of depressive disorders, self-harm, and suicide with use of montelukast compared with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. METHODS: Using data from the Sentinel Distributed Database from January 1, 2000, to September 30, 2015, patients (n = 457,377) exposed to montelukast or ICS, aged 6 years and older with a diagnosis of asthma, were matched 1:1 on propensity scores. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated for each study outcome overall and by age, sex, psychiatric history, and pre-/post-2008 labeling updates using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Exposure to montelukast was associated with a lower risk of treated outpatient depressive disorder (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93). No increased risks of inpatient depressive disorder (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24), self-harm (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.69-1.21), or self-harm using a modified algorithm (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63-1.05) were observed with montelukast use compared with ICS use. Most PAEs occurred in the roughly one-third of patients having a past psychiatric history. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with use of ICS, we did not find associations between montelukast use and hospitalizations for depression or self-harm events. Our findings should be interpreted considering the study's limitations. Psychiatric comorbidity was common, and most PAEs occurred in patients with a past psychiatric history.

Perspectives of colorectal cancer risk and screening among Dominicans and Puerto Ricans: stigma and misperceptions.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer among Latinos, but a lower percentage of Latinos are screened than Whites and Blacks. Along with recognized economic barriers, differences in knowledge and perceptions might impede colorectal screening among Latinos. We conducted 147 individual, qualitative interviews with Dominicans and Puerto Ricans in the northeastern United States to explore their explanatory models for colorectal cancer and screening barriers. Many participants had not previously heard of colorectal cancer. The most commonly mentioned cause of colorectal cancer was anal sex. Also considered risks were "bad food," digestion leading to constipation, and strained bowel movements. Screening barriers included stigma, misperceptions, embarrassment, and machismo. Progress toward increasing colorectal cancer screening requires normalization of this screening among Latinos. Higher patient familiarity, along with improved physician counseling and referral, might contribute to reducing stigma and other barriers, and to enhancing knowledge and Latino community support of colorectal cancer screening.