Effect of remimazolam versus propofol anesthesia on postoperative delirium in neurovascular surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine newly approved for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Remimazolam emerges as an ideal drug for the neurosurgical population due to its rapid emergence, enabling early neurological assessment, and its ability to maintain perfusion pressure, which is crucial for preventing cerebral ischemia. However, the use of benzodiazepine has been associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium (POD). There is currently limited evidence about the relationship between remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and POD. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial, we plan to include 696 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to III, undergoing elective neurovascular surgery under general anesthesia. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either remimazolam or propofol-based TIVA with a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the incidence of POD within 5 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include subtypes, number of positive assessments and severity of POD, emergence agitation, intraoperative awareness and undesirable patient movement, intraoperative hypotension, and postoperative cognitive function. The data will be analyzed in modified intention to treat. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the effect of remimazolam on the development of POD compared to propofol anesthesia. The results of this trial will provide evidence regarding the choice of optimal anesthetics to minimize the risk of POD in neurosurgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06115031, principal investigator: Jiseon Jeong; date of first registration: November 2, 2023, before the recruitment of the first participant.

The association of withholding or continuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers on acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Withholding or continuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers peri-operatively in non-cardiac surgery remains controversial as they may result in intra-operative hypotension and postoperative organ damage. METHODS: We included patients prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers who underwent surgical procedures > 1 h duration under general or spinal anaesthesia from January 2012 to June 2022 in a single centre. We categorised patients by whether these drugs were withheld for 24 h before surgery. We evaluated the association of withholding these drugs before non-cardiac surgery with creatinine concentrations that increased ≥ 26.4 µmol.l-1 in the first 48 postoperative hours (acute kidney injury). We also analysed changes in creatinine concentrations and estimated glomerular filtration rates. RESULTS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers were withheld in 24,285 of 32,933 (74%) patients and continued in 8648 (26%) patients. We used propensity scores for drug discontinuation to match 8631 patient pairs who did or did not continue these drugs: acute kidney injury was recorded for 1791 (21%) patients who continued these drugs vs. 1587 (18%) who did not (OR (95%CI) 1.16 (1.08-1.25), p < 0.001). Intra-operative hypotension was recorded for 3892 (45%) patients who continued drugs vs. 3373 (39%) patients who did not (OR (95%CI) 1.28 (1.21-1.36), p < 0.001). Continuing drugs was independently associated with a mean increase in creatinine of 2.2 µmol.l-1 (p < 0.001) and a mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 1.4 ml.min.1.73 m-2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers 24 h before non-cardiac surgery was associated with intra-operative hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury.

Comparison of tracheal versus esophageal temperatures during laparoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: Recently, endotracheal tubes with an embedded temperature sensor in the inner surface of the tube cuff (temperature tracheal tubes) have been developed. We sought to assess whether temperature tracheal tubes show a good agreement with esophageal temperature probes during surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in an observational study. The tracheas of all patients were intubated with a temperature tracheal tube, and an esophageal temperature probe was inserted into the esophagus. Tracheal and esophageal temperatures were recorded at 15-min intervals until the end of surgery. Temperatures from both devices were analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis, four-quadrant plots, and polar plots. RESULTS: We analyzed 261 data points from 36 patients. Temperatures ranges were 34.2 °C to 36.6 °C for the tracheal temperature tube and 34.7 °C to 37.2 °C for the esophageal temperature probe. Bland-Altman analysis showed an acceptable agreement between the two devices, with an overall mean bias (95% limit of agreement) of -0.3 °C (-0.8 °C to 0.1 °C) and a percentage error of 3%; the trending ability (temperature changes over time) between the two devices showed a concordance rate of 94% in four-quadrant plot (cut-off ≥ 92%), but this was higher than the acceptable mean angular bias of 177° (cut-off < ± 5°) and radial limits of agreement of 52° (cut-off < ± 30°) in the polar plot. Bronchoscopy during extubation and patient interviews at six hours postoperatively revealed no serious injuries related to the use of the temperature tracheal tube. CONCLUSION: The temperature tracheal tube showed an acceptable overall mean bias of -0.3 °C and a percentage error of 3%, but incompatible trending ability with the esophageal temperature probe. STUDY REGISTRATION: cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007265); 22 April 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Récemment, des sondes endotrachéales munies d'un capteur de température intégré dans la surface interne du ballonnet de la sonde (sondes thermiques trachéales) ont été mises au point. Nous avons cherché à évaluer si les sondes trachéales de température montraient une bonne concordance avec les sondes thermiques œsophagiennes pendant la chirurgie. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté 40 patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie par laparoscopie dans le cadre d'une étude observationnelle. Les trachées de tou·tes les patient·es ont été intubées à l'aide d'une sonde trachéale de température et une sonde thermique œsophagienne a été insérée dans l'œsophage. Les températures trachéale et œsophagienne ont été enregistrées à des intervalles de 15 minutes jusqu'à la fin de la chirurgie. Les températures des deux appareils ont été analysées à l'aide d'une analyse de Bland-Altman, de diagrammes à quatre quadrants et de diagrammes polaires. RéSULTATS: Nous avons analysé 261 points de données provenant de 36 patient·es. Les plages de température allaient de 34,2 °C à 36,6 °C pour la sonde trachéale de température et de 34,7 °C à 37,2 °C pour la sonde thermique œsophagienne. L'analyse de Bland-Altman a montré une concordance acceptable entre les deux dispositifs, avec un biais moyen global (limite de 95 % de la concordance) de −0,3 °C (−0,8 °C à 0,1 °C) et un pourcentage d'erreur de 3 %; la capacité de tendance (changements de température au fil du temps) entre les deux dispositifs a montré un taux de concordance de 94 % dans un diagramme à quatre quadrants (limite ≥ 92 %), mais cette capacité était plus élevée que le biais angulaire moyen acceptable de 177° (limite < ± 5°) et que les limites radiales de l'accord de 52° (limite < ± 30°) dans le diagramme polaire. La bronchoscopie réalisée lors de l'extubation et les entretiens avec les patient·es six heures après l'opération n'ont révélé aucune blessure grave liée à l'utilisation de la sonde trachéale de température. CONCLUSION: La sonde trachéale de température a montré un biais moyen global acceptable de −0,3 °C et un pourcentage d'erreur de 3 %, mais une capacité de tendance incompatible avec la sonde thermique œsophagienne. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007265); 22 avril 2022.

Effect of continuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers on the day of surgery on myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of continuing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) prescriptions 24 h before surgery on postoperative myocardial injury and blood pressure in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective study. SETTING: Operating room and perioperative care area. PATIENTS: 42,432 patients who had been taking chronic ACEI/ARB underwent non-cardiac surgery from January 2012 to June 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who discontinued ACEI/ARB 24 h before surgery (withheld group, n=31,055) and those who continued ACEI/ARB 24 h before surgery (continued group, n=11,377). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) within 7 days postoperatively. MINS was defined as an elevated postoperative cardiac troponin measurement above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit with a rise/fall pattern. Perioperative blood pressure and clinical outcomes were secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Among 42,432 patients, MINS occurred in 2848 patients (6.7%) and was the all-cause of death within 30 days in 122 patients (0.3%). Incidence of MINS was significantly higher in the continued group than the withheld group (847/11,377 [7.4%] vs. 2001/31,055 [6.4%]; OR [95% CI] 1.17 [1.07-1.27]; P<0.001). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 11,373 patients were included in each group. There was still a significant difference for the occurrence of MINS between two groups in matched cohort (7.4% vs. 6.6%, OR [95% CI] 1.14 [1.03-1.26]; P=0.015). Time-average weight of mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg during surgery was significantly higher in the continued group (mean 0.11 vs. 0.09 [95% CI of mean difference] [0.01-0.03]; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in other clinical outcomes and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Withholding ACEI/ARB before surgery was associated with a reduced risk of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative myocardial injury, but it did not affect overall clinical outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Effect of Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Diastolic Function: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of sevoflurane on left ventricular diastolic function is not well understood. We hypothesized that parameters of diastolic function may improve under sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with preexisting diastolic dysfunction compared to patients with normal diastolic function. METHODS: This observational study included 60 patients undergoing breast surgery or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were assigned to diastolic dysfunction (n = 34) or normal (n = 26) groups of septal e' < 8 or ≥ 8.0 cm/s on the first thoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed before anesthesia. During anesthesia, sevoflurane was maintained at 1 to 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) to maintain the bispectral index at 40 to 50. At the end of surgery, the second TTE was performed under 0.8 to 1 MAC of sevoflurane with the patient breathing spontaneously without ventilator support. Primary end point was the percentage change (Δ) of e' on 2 TTEs (Δe'). Secondary end points were ΔE/e', Δleft atrial volume index (ΔLAVI), and Δtricuspid regurgitation maximum velocity (ΔTR Vmax). These percentage changes (Δ) were compared between diastolic dysfunction and normal groups. RESULTS: e' (Δe': 30 [6, 64] vs 0 [-18, 11]%; P < .001), mitral inflow E wave velocity (E), mitral inflow E/A ratio (E/A), and mitral E velocity deceleration time (DT) improved significantly in diastolic dysfunction group compared to normal group. LAVI decreased in diastolic dysfunction group but did not reach statistical significance between the 2 groups (ΔLAVI:-15 [-31, -3] vs -4 [-20, 10]%, P = .091). ΔE/e' was not different between the 2 groups (11 [-16, 26] vs 12 [-9, 22]%, P = .853) (all: median [interquartile range, IQR]). TR was minimal in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function, including septal e', E, E/A, and DT, improved with sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with preexisting diastolic dysfunction, but remained unchanged in patients with normal diastolic function.

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus as an ideal method for labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is effective for labor analgesia, an appropriate flow rate has not been established. Therefore, we investigated the analgesic effect based on different epidural injection flow rates. METHODS: Nulliparous women scheduled for spontaneous labor were enrolled in this randomized trial. After injection of intrathecal 0.2% ropivacaine 3 mg with fentanyl 20 µg, participants were randomized to three study groups. Epidural analgesics, 10 ml during one hour, were administered with patient controlled epidural analgesia as follows (0.2% ropivacaine 60 ml, fentanyl 180 µg, and 0.9% saline 40 ml): continuous (n = 28, 10 ml/h for continuous infusion), PIEB (n = 29, 240 ml/h for bolus infusion of 10 ml), or manual (n = 28, 1200 ml/h for bolus injection of 10 ml). The primary outcome was hourly consumption of the epidural solution. The time interval between labor analgesia and the first breakthrough pain was investigated. RESULTS: The median (Q1, Q3) hourly consumption of epidural anesthetics was significantly different among the groups (continuous: 14.3 [8.7, 16.9] ml, PIEB: 9.4 [6.2, 9.8] ml, manual: 8.6 [7.6, 9.9] ml; P < 0.001). The time to breakthrough pain for the PIEB group was longer than that for the other groups (continuous: 78.5 [35.8, 185.0] min, PIEB: 200.0 [88.5, 441.5] min, manual: 60.5 [37.3, 162.0] min, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: PIEB, with a low-flow rate, provided more adequate labor analgesia than a continuous epidural infusion or manual injection with a high-flow rate.

The arousal effect of sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blockade differs with anesthetic depth in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular blockade by encapsulating steroidal neuromuscular blockers; therefore, it does not pharmacologically affect sedation levels. However, some clinicians avoid using it because of sudden unwanted acting out or patient arousal. Previous studies suggested sugammadex-induced awakening, but frontal muscle contraction after sugammadex administration compromised reliability of results obtained from EEG-based anesthesia depth monitoring tools like bispectral index (BIS). We hypothesized that sugammadex would affect patients' arousal depending on their baseline levels of sedation. We evaluated arousal signs after sugammadex administration with BIS between 25 - 35 and 45 - 55 under steady-state propofol-remifentanil anesthesia at the end of a surgery (n = 33 in each group). After sugammadex administration, twelve patients with a BIS of 45 - 55 showed clinical signs of awakening but none with a BIS of 25 - 35 (36.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). The distribution of the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale scores was also significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001). Changes in the BIS were significantly greater in the BIS 45 - 55 than in the 25 - 35 group (median difference, 7; 95% CI 2 - 19, P = 0.002). Arousal after sugammadex was affected by patient sedation levels, and clinical signs of awakening appeared only in those with BIS 45 - 55. Unwanted arousal of the patient should be considered when using sugammadex under shallow anesthesia.Clinical trial registry number: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ; Principal investigator: Jieae Kim; Registration number: KCT0006248; Date of first registration: 11/06/2021).

Factors to consider during anesthesia in patients undergoing preemptive kidney transplantation: a propensity-score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines have recommended preemptive kidney transplantation (KT) as the preferred approach, advocating for transplantation before the initiation of dialysis. This approach is advantageous for graft and patient survival by avoiding dialysis-related complications. However, recipients of preemptive KT may undergo anesthesia without the opportunity to optimize volume status or correct metabolic disturbances associated with end-stage renal disease. In these regard, we aimed to investigate the anesthetic events that occur more frequently during preemptive KT compared to nonpreemptive KT. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. Of the 672 patients who underwent Living donor KT (LDKT), 388 of 519 who underwent nonpreemptive KT were matched with 153 of 153 who underwent preemptive KT using propensity score based on preoperative covariates. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined as area under the threshold (AUT), with a threshold set at a mean arterial blood pressure below 70 mmHg. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative metabolic acidosis estimated by base excess and serum bicarbonate, electrolyte imbalance, the use of inotropes or vasopressors, intraoperative transfusion, immediate graft function evaluated by the nadir creatinine, and re-operation due to bleeding. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, we analyzed 388 and 153 patients in non-preemptive and preemptive groups. The multivariable analysis revealed the AUT of the preemptive group to be significantly greater than that of the nonpreemptive group (mean ± standard deviation, 29.7 ± 61.5 and 14.5 ± 37.7, respectively, P = 0.007). Metabolic acidosis was more severe in the preemptive group compared to the nonpreemptive group. The differences in the nadir creatinine value and times to nadir creatinine were statistically significant, but clinically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative hypotension and metabolic acidosis occurred more frequently in the preemptive group during LDKT. These findings highlight the need for anesthesiologists to be prepared and vigilant in managing these events during surgery.

Comparison of the perfusion index as an index of noxious stimulation in monitored anesthesia care of propofol/remifentanil and propofol/dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, case-control, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, one of the sedatives, has an analgesic effect. We aimed to investigate postoperative analgesia with dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for procedural sedation using perfusion index (PI). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, case-control, observational study, 72 adult patients, 19-70 years, who were scheduled for chemoport insertion under monitored anesthesia care were performed. According to the group assignment, remifentanil or dexmedetomidine was simultaneously infused with propofol. The primary outcome was PI 30 min after admission to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). And, pain severity using numerical rating scale (NRS) score and the relationship between NRS score and PI were investigated. RESULTS: During PACU staying, PI values were significantly different between the two groups PI values at 30 min after admission to the PACU were 1.3 (0.9-2.0) in the remifentanil group and 4.5 (2.9-6.8) in the dexmedetomidine group (median difference, 3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.2; P < 0.001). The NRS scores at 30 min after admission to the PACU were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.002). However, there was a weak positive correlation between NRS score and PI in the PACU (correlation coefficient, 0.188; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: We could not find a significant correlation between PI and NRS score for postoperative pain control. Using PI as a single indicator of pain is insufficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr : KCT0003501, the date of registration: 13/02/2019.

Comparison of Early and Late Surgeries after Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients with Normal Preoperative Troponin Level: A Retrospective Study.

Current guidelines recommend delaying noncardiac surgery for 6 months after drug eluting stent implantation. However, this recommendation is largely based on limited evidence and various event definitions. Whether early surgery within 6 months of coronary stent implantation increases myocardial injury in patients with normal preoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) has not yet been investigated. This retrospective study assessed patients who received coronary stent implantation and underwent noncardiac surgery (vascular, abdominal, or thoracic) between 2010 and 2017 with normal preoperative hs-cTnI (n = 186). Patients were divided into early (within 6 months of PCI) and late (after 6 months of PCI) groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of myocardial injury as diagnosed by hs-cTnI within 3 days post-operation. The secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, emergent coronary revascularization, major bleeding (bleeding requiring transfusion or intracranial bleeding), stroke, renal failure, heart failure, or death within 30 days post-operation. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was carried out to adjust for the intergroup baseline differences. Myocardial injury occurred in 28.6% (8/28) and 27.8% (44/158) of the early and late groups, respectively, with no difference between groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.067, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.404, 2.482; p = 0.886). Secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups. IPTW analysis also showed no differences in myocardial injury and secondary outcomes between the groups. In conclusion, early surgery within 6 months after coronary stent implantation did not increase the incidence of myocardial injury in patients with normal preoperative hs-cTnI.

Changes in bispectral index and patient state index during sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blockade under steady-state sevoflurane anesthesia.

Few studies have investigated the changes in patient state index (PSI) and bispectral index (BIS) in response to abrupt increase in electromyographic (EMG) activity. These were performed using intravenous anesthetics or reversal agents for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) other than sugammadex. We compared the changes in BIS and PSI values caused by the sugammadex reversal of NMB during steady-state sevoflurane anesthesia. We enrolled 50 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2. At the end of the surgery, we administered 2 mg kg-1 sugammadex while maintaining sevoflurane for a 10-min study period. The changes in BIS and PSI from baseline (T0) to train of four ratio of 90% were not significantly different (median difference 0; 95% CI - 3 to 2; P = 0.83), neither were the changes in BIS and PSI values from T0 to their maximum values (median difference 1; 95% CI - 1 to 4; P = 0.53). Maximum BIS and PSI were significantly higher than their baseline values (median difference 6; 95% CI 4-9; P < 0.001 and median difference 5; 95% CI 3-6; P < 0.001, respectively). We found weak positive correlations between BIS and BIS-EMG (r = 0.12, P = 0.01), as well as PSI and PSI-EMG (r = 0.25, P < 0.001). Both PSI and BIS were affected to some extent by EMG artifacts after sugammadex administration.

Intraoperative Factors Modifying the Risk of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after liver transplantation is not fully understood. We aimed to determine the intraoperative contributors to PPC. METHODS: The retrospectively collected cohort included 605 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. PPCs comprised respiratory failure, respiratory infection, pulmonary edema, atelectasis (at least moderate degree), pneumothorax, and pleural effusion (at least moderate degree). The presence and type of PPC were evaluated by 2 pulmonary physicians. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and PPC risk. RESULTS: Of the 605 patients, 318 patients (52.6%) developed 486 PPCs. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PPC risk decreased with low tidal volume ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [0.41-0.94], P = 0.023) and increased with greater driving pressure at the end of surgery (OR 1.08 [1.01-1.14], P = 0.018), prolonged hypotension (OR 1.85 [1.27-2.70], P = 0.001), and blood albumin level ≤3.0 g/dL at the end of surgery (OR 2.43 [1.51-3.92], P < 0.001). Survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 mo after transplantation was 91.2%, 89.6%, and 86.5%, respectively, in patients with PPCs and 98.3%, 96.5%, and 93.4%, respectively, in patients without PPCs (hazard ratio 2.2 [1.3-3.6], P = 0.004). Graft survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 mo after transplantation was 89.3%, 87.1%, and 84.3%, respectively, in patients with PPCs and 97.6%, 95.8%, and 92.7%, respectively, in patients without PPCs (hazard ratio 2.3 [1.4-3.7], P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that tidal volume, driving pressure, hypotension, and albumin level during living donor liver transplantation were significantly associated with PPC risk. These data may help determine patients at risk of PPC or develop an intraoperative lung-protective strategy for liver transplant recipients.

Effects of 20% albumin infusion therapy during liver transplantation on plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level: A randomized controlled trial.

The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation was lower in patients with serum albumin levels ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. We tested whether intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin affects neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level, a reliable indicator of AKI. We randomly assigned 134 patients undergoing liver transplantation into albumin group (n=70, 20% albumin 200 mL) and the control group (n=66, crystalloid solution 200 mL). The 2 study fluids were infused at 100 mL/h from the start of the anhepatic phase. The primary outcome was plasma NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion. Albumin level at the start of graft reperfusion was significantly greater in albumin group than in the control group [2.9 (2.4-3.3) g/dL vs. 2.3 (2.0-2.7) g/dL, p <0.001]. The NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion was not significantly different between the 2 groups [100.2 (66.7-138.8) ng/mL vs. 92.9 (70.8-120.6) ng/mL, p =0.46], and the AKI risk was not either (63.9% vs. 67.8%, adjusted p =0.73). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding hospital readmission within 30 days/90 days after transplantation (32.6% vs. 41.5%, adjusted p =0.19 and 55.0% vs. 55.7%, adjusted p =0.87). Graft survival probability at 30 days/90 days/1 year after transplantation was 90.0%/84.3%/78.6% in albumin group and 97.0%/90.9%/89.4% in the control group [HR=1.6 (0.6-4.0), adjusted p =0.31]. In conclusion, intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin 200 mL increased the albumin level but failed to maintain serum albumin ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. The hypertonic albumin therapy did not significantly affect plasma NGAL level and clinical outcomes including AKI.

Remimazolam dose for successful insertion of a supraglottic airway device with opioids: a dose-determination study using Dixon's up-and-down method.

PURPOSE: Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, was recently approved in numerous jurisdictions as an induction drug for general anesthesia. We aimed to determine the doses of remimazolam that would allow placement of a supraglottic airway device (SGD) in 50% and 95% of nonparalyzed patients (ED50 and ED95). METHODS: In this prospective study, 30 American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status I-II grade female patients scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with 1 µg·kg-1 of fentanyl and continuous infusion of remimazolam without neuromuscular blockade. An i-gel® SGD was inserted 2.5 min after the start of remimazolam infusion. We used Dixon's up-and-down method and isotonic regression to determine the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for insertion of an SGD. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam required for successful i-gel insertion were 8.8 mg·kg-1·hr-1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 10.6) and 10.7 mg·kg-1·hr-1 (95% CI, 10.6 to 11.7), respectively. A nonfully relaxed jaw was found in 7/13 patients (54%) in the success group and 14/15 patients (93%) in the failure group (difference in proportions, 40%; 95% CI, 7 to 65; P = 0.02). Bucking or other movements during SGD insertion only occurred in the failure group (11/15, 73%). CONCLUSION: In 95% of nonparalyzed female patients undergoing hysteroscopy, 10.7 mg·kg-1·hr-1 of remimazolam with 1 µg·kg-1 of fentanyl facilitates i-gel insertion. Remimazolam showed a high incidence of poor jaw relaxation and bucking or other movements during SGD insertion. STUDY REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of the Republic of Korea (KCT0006527, https://cris.nih.go.kr ; registered 1 September 2021; principal investigator: Ji Seon Jeong).

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le remimazolam, une benzodiazépine à action ultra-brève, a récemment été approuvé dans de nombreuses juridictions comme agent d'induction pour l'anesthésie générale. Notre objectif était de déterminer les doses de remimazolam qui permettraient l'insertion d'un dispositif supraglottique (DSG) chez 50 % et 95 % des patients non paralysés (DE50 et DE95). MéTHODE: Dans cette étude prospective, 30 patientes de statut physique I-II selon l'American Society of Anesthesiology devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie hystéroscopique ont été recrutées. L'anesthésie a été induite avec 1 µg·kg−1 de fentanyl et une perfusion continue de remimazolam sans bloc neuromusculaire. Un DSG i-gel® a été inséré 2,5 minutes après l'amorce de la perfusion de remimazolam. Nous avons utilisé la méthode de l'escalier de Dixon et la régression isotonique pour déterminer la DE50 et DE95 de remimazolam pour l'insertion d'un DSG. RéSULTATS: Vingt-huit patientes ont été incluses dans l'analyse. Les DE50 et DE95 du remimazolam requises pour une insertion réussie de l'i-gel était de 8,8 mg·kg−1·h−1 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 6,3 à 10,6) et 10,7 mg·kg−1·h−1 (IC 95 %, 10,6 à 11,7), respectivement. Une mâchoire non complètement détendue a été observée chez 7 patientes sur 13 (54 %) dans le groupe d'intubation réussie et chez 14/15 patientes (93 %) dans le groupe d'échec d'intubation (différence de proportions, 40 %; IC 95 %, 7 à 65; P = 0,02). Le fléchissement ou d'autres mouvements pendant l'insertion du DSG ne se sont produits que dans le groupe d'échec de l'induction (11/15, 73 %). CONCLUSION: Chez 95 % des patientes non paralysées bénéficiant d'une hystéroscopie, 10,7 mg·kg−1·h−1 de remimazolam avec 1 µg·kg−1 de fentanyl ont facilité l'insertion d'un dispositif i-gel. Le remimazolam a montré une incidence élevée de mauvaise relaxation de la mâchoire et de fléchissement ou d'autres mouvements lors de l'insertion du DSG. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: Registre des essais cliniques de la République de Corée (KCT0006527, https://cris.nih.go.kr ; enregistrée le 1er septembre 2021; chercheur principal : Ji Seon Jeong).

The impact of driving pressure on postoperative pulmonary complication in patients with different respiratory spirometry.

Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) have not been determined according to preoperative respiratory spirometry. Thus, we aimed to find contributors for PPC in patients with restrictive or normal spirometric pattern. We analyzed 654 patients (379 with normal and 275 with restrictive spirometric pattern). PPCs comprised respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, respiratory infection, and bronchospasm. We analyzed the association between perioperative factors and PPC using binary logistic regression. In particular, we conducted subgroup analysis on the patients stratified according to preoperative spirometry. Of 654 patients, 27/379 patients (7.1%) with normal spirometric pattern and 33/275 patients (12.0%) with restrictive spirometric pattern developed PPCs. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that high driving pressure was the only intraoperative modifiable factor increasing PPC risk (OR = 1.13 [1.02-1.25], p = 0.025). In the subgroup of patients with restrictive spirometric pattern, intraoperative driving pressure was significantly associated with PPC (OR = 1.21 [1.05-1.39], p = 0.009), whereas driving pressure was not associated with PPC in patients with normal spirometric pattern (OR = 1.04 [0.89-1.21], p = 0.639). In patients with restrictive spirometric pattern, greater intraoperative driving pressure is significantly associated with increased PPC risk. In contrast, intraoperative driving pressure is not associated with PPC in patients with normal spirometric pattern.

Association between cardiologist evaluation and mortality in myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is strongly associated with mortality, but few studies assessed treatment strategies. This study aimed to identify whether evaluation by cardiologists could reduce mortality in MINS patients. METHODS: From a single-centre retrospective cohort, we enrolled a total of 5633 adult patients diagnosed with MINS between January 2010 and June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on evaluation by cardiologist, which was defined as a cardiology consultation or transfer to the cardiology department. For the outcome, 30-day mortality was compared in crude and propensity-score matched populations. RESULTS: Of a total of 5633 patients, 2120 (37.6%) were evaluated by cardiologists and 3513 (62.4%) were not. Mortality during the first 30 days after surgery was significantly lower in MINS patients who were evaluated by cardiologists compared with those who were not (5.8% vs 8.3%; HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80; p<0.001 for all-cause mortality and 1.6% vs 2.0; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96; p=0.03 for cardiovascular mortality). The propensity score matched analysis showed similar results (5.6% vs 8.6%; HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.81; p<0.001 for all-cause mortality and 1.3% vs 2.2%; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95; p=0.03 for cardiovascular mortality). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologist evaluation was associated with lower mortality in patients diagnosed with MINS. Further studies are needed to identify effective treatment strategies for MINS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0004244.

Changes in Blood Potassium after Reperfusion during Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: An Exploratory Study.

The incidence of hyperkalemia (>5.5 mEq/L) or high blood potassium (5-5.5 mEq/L) during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is reported to be more than 10%. It occurs more frequently in the early post-reperfusion period and is a major cause of post-reperfusion arrhythmia and cardiac arrest. Unlike deceased-donor liver transplantation, the pattern of blood potassium changes immediately after reperfusion has not been described in LDLT. From January 2021 to March 2021, fifteen consecutive patients were enrolled. Baseline blood potassium was measured from blood samples obtained 10-min (T-10) and immediately before (T0) reperfusion. During the first 5 min after reperfusion, blood potassium measurements were conducted every one minute (T1-T5). The blood potassium levels at T-10 and T0 were 3.8 ± 0.4 and 3.9 ± 0.4 mEq/L, respectively. After reperfusion, mean increases (95% CI) in blood potassium from T-10 and T0 were 0.5 (0.4-0.6) and 0.4 (0.3-0.5) mEq/L, respectively. Blood potassium peaked at T1, returned to baseline at T3, and fell below the baseline at T5. Peak blood potassium after reperfusion showed strong correlations with blood potassium measured at T-10 (p < 0.001) and T0 (p < 0.0001). These findings can support the establishment of future research plans and perioperative management of blood potassium in LDLT.

Association between preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and mortality after plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Predictive factors associated with postoperative mortality have not been extensively studied in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a systemic inflammation index, has been shown to have a predictive value in surgery. We aimed to evaluate association between preoperative NLR and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. From January 2011 to July 2019, we identified 7089 consecutive adult patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. The patients were divided according to median value of preoperative NLR of 1.84. The low NLR group was composed of 3535 patients (49.9%), and 3554 patients (50.1%) were in the high NLR group. The primary outcome was mortality during the first year, and overall mortality and acute kidney injury were also compared. In further analysis, outcomes were compared according to quartile of NLR, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to estimate the threshold associated with 1-year mortality. This observational study showed that mortality during the first year after plastic and reconstructive surgery was significantly increased in the high NLR group (0.7% vs. 3.5%; hazard ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.69-6.63; p < 0.001), and a graded association was observed between preoperative NLR and 1-year mortality. The estimated threshold of preoperative NLR was 2.5, with an area under curve of 0.788. Preoperative NLR may be associated with 1-year mortality after plastic and reconstructive surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

A case series of medical disputes related to chronic pain management in South Korea between 2009 and 2019: An analysis of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database.

ABSTRACT: As interventional pain management has been growing rapidly worldwide and chronic pain management is provided by a diverse range of practitioners, malpractice litigation has increased. Therefore, we examined the characteristics of medical disputes related to chronic pain management from 2009 to 2019 in South Korea.In this retrospective study, we analyzed the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database covering case files from July 2009 to June 2019. We compared characteristics of patients, treatment details, mechanisms of injury, specific complications, clinical manifestations of injury, and outcomes between the first half (2009-2014, n = 33) and the second half (2014-2019, n = 65) of the study period using the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists Legislation Committee database.During the 10-year study period, the proportion of cases for chronic pain management in cases referred for surgical anesthesia or chronic pain management increased annually by 2.9% (R2 = 0.489, 95% confidence interval: 0.5%-5.2%, P = .024). While invasive procedure-related cases decreased from 63.6% in the first half to 38.5% in the second half (P = .019), complex regional pain syndrome-associated cases increased from 30.3% (10/33) to 55.4% (36/65) during this period (P = .019). The proportion of cases involving non-anesthesiologists in invasive procedure-related cases increased from 14.3% in the first half to 64.0% in the second half (P = .002). The majority of invasive procedure-related cases (82.6%, 38/46) were determined as 'directly related to the procedure'. Of these, the 3 most common damaging events were bleeding, intrathecal injection of local anesthetics, and infectious complications (each n = 6).During a recent decade, there were several typical changes in the characteristics of medical dispute cases related to chronic pain management, including an increasing trend of cases for chronic pain management relative to surgical anesthesia-related cases, a higher severity of complications in cervical procedures, an increase in complex regional pain syndrome-related cases, and an increase in cases involving non-anesthesiologists.

Association between Intraoperative Hyperlactatemia and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen demand-supply mismatch is supposed to be one of the major causes of myocardial injuries after noncardiac surgery (MINS). Impaired tissue oxygenation during the surgery can lead to intraoperative hyperlactatemia. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between intraoperative lactate level and MINS. METHODS: A total of 1905 patients divided into groups according to intraoperative hyperlactatemia: 1444 patients (75.8%) into normal (≤2.2 mmol/L) and 461 patients (24.2%) into hyperlactatemia (>2.2 mmol/L) groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of MINS, and all-cause mortality within 30 days was compared. RESULTS: In the crude population, the risks for MINS and 30-day mortality were higher for the hyperlactatemia group than the normal group (17.7% vs. 37.7%, odds ratio [OR]: 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.24-3.56, p < 0.001 and 0.8% vs. 4.8%, hazard ratio [HR]: 5.86, 95% CI: 2.9-12.84, p < 0.001, respectively). In 365 propensity score-matched pairs, intraoperative hyperlactatemia was consistently associated with MINS and 30-day mortality (21.6% vs. 31.8%, OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.21-1.36, p = 0.002 and 1.1% vs. 3.8%, HR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.71-10.79, p < 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative lactate elevation was associated with a higher incidence of MINS and 30-day mortality.