Mapping Strategies for Reaching Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Clinical Trials.

Importance: Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, such as persons with low income and those with low educational attainment, are less likely to participate in clinical trials than those with higher earnings and higher educational attainment, despite the former being more likely to have chronic medical conditions. Ways to improve the representation of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in clinical trials deserve attention. Objective: To examine whether current recruitment and enrollment strategies used by US clinical research sites appropriately include patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted between April and July 2023. An online survey was distributed among US clinical research sites to explore their use of these strategies and the types of patient sociodemographic and socioeconomic data they collect. The survey was distributed by 13 pharmaceutical companies and 1 clinical research organization. Eight targeted strategies known to increase the recruitment and retention of socioeconomically disadvantaged participants as well as 6 general strategies to recruit and retain clinical trial participants were identified. Data analysis was performed between August and September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportions of for-profit vs nonprofit or governmental sites that use recruitment and retention strategies, proportions that have partnerships with community organizations that target socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, and the distribution of sociodemographic and socioeconomic data collected by sites about their patients. A χ2 test of independence was performed to assess the association between research site ownership type and levels of adoption of strategies. Results: A total of 492 responses were collected from 381 clinical research sites in the US (219 for-profit sites [57.5%] and 162 nonprofit or governmental sites [42.5%]). Overall, compared with nonprofit or governmental sites, for-profit sites reported higher use of strategies shown to increase the recruitment and retention of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, including always or often providing after-hours visits (84 of 173 for-profit sites [48.6%]; 22 of 123 nonprofit or governmental sites [17.9%]) and offering financial compensation (135 of 162 for-profit sites [83.3%]; 60 of 123 nonprofit or governmental sites [48.8%]). Additionally, there was an association between research site ownership type and levels of adoption of these strategies; for example, for-profit sites were more likely to provide after-hours visits (χ2 = 30.33; P < .001) and offer financial compensation (χ2 = 49.35; P < .001). Only 7.2% of for-profit sites (12 of 167) and 13.0% of nonprofit or governmental sites (16 of 123) collected information on the patient's annual income. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, we found an association between a clinical research site's ownership type (for-profit vs nonprofit or governmental) and how often it used strategies to engage socioeconomically diverse populations in clinical research. Regardless of ownership type, most clinical research sites did not collect socioeconomic information from patients. Adoption of strategies to engage socioeconomically diverse populations, particularly by nonprofit or governmental sites, may help minimize barriers to participation for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

Applying Systems Thinking to Inform Decentralized Clinical Trial Planning and Deployment.

Recently, there has been a growing interest in understanding how decentralized clinical trial (DCT) solutions can mitigate existing challenges in clinical development, particularly participant burden and access, and the collection, management, and quality of clinical data. This paper examines DCT deployments, emphasizing how they are integrated and how they may impact clinical trial oversight, management, and execution. We propose a conceptual framework that employs systems thinking to evaluate the impact on key stakeholders through a reiterative assessment of pain points. We conclude that decentralized solutions should be customized to meet patient needs and preferences and the unique requirements of each clinical trial. We discuss how DCT elements introduce new demands and pressures within the existing system and reflect on enablers that can overcome DCT implementation challenges. As stakeholders look for ways to make clinical research more relevant and accessible to a larger and more diverse patient population, further robust and granular research is needed to quantify the impact of DCTs empirically.

Benchmarking Patient Engagement Capabilities and Preparedness of Drug Development Sponsors.

Consistent implementation and measurement of patient engagement initiatives across the industry have remained aspirational and elusive despite strong interest in adopting patient-centric approaches. One factor contributing to this inertia stems from a lack of standardized implementation of patient engagement activities, which varies widely from company to company, making it difficult to track and measure. Further, empirical evidence mapping the impact of patient engagement capabilities on clinical research outcomes has remained sparse. To address this gap, the Drug Information Association (DIA) and Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) at the Tufts University School of Medicine developed and administered an assessment tool that companies can use to not only evaluate their organization's patient engagement capabilities and implementation preparedness but can also measure the impact of such activities on trial outcomes. Results showed that while most organizations are providing logistical support to increase patient engagement in the form of travel stipends, accommodation, and financial incentives, most are not implementing more involved forms of patient engagement such as gathering patient input through patient input panels or patient steering committees. This paper discusses the process for designing and administering this assessment tool, the results of the assessment, and future implications.

Effects of Propofol on Hemodynamic Profile in Adults Receiving Targeted Temperature Management.

Background: Propofol is a key component for the management of sedation and shivering during targeted temperature management (TTM) following cardiac arrest. The cardiac depressant effects of propofol have not been described during TTM and may be especially relevant given the stress to the myocardium following cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study is to describe hemodynamic changes associated with propofol administration during TTM. Methods: This single center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who received a propofol infusion for at least 30 minutes during TTM. The primary outcome was the change in cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (cvSOFA) score 30 minutes after propofol initiation. Secondary outcomes included change in systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and vasopressor requirements (VR) expressed as norepinephrine equivalents at 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after propofol initiation. A multivariate regression was performed to assess the influence of propofol and body temperature on MAP, while controlling for vasopressor dose and cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (CAHP) score. Results: The cohort included 40 patients with a median CAHP score of 197. The goal temperature of 33°C was achieved for all patients. The median cvSOFA score was 1 at baseline and 0.5 at 30 minutes, with a non-significant change after propofol initiation (P = .96). SBP and MAP reductions were the greatest at 60 minutes (17 and 8 mmHg; P < .05 for both). The median change in HR at 120 minutes was -9 beats/minute from baseline. This reduction was sustained through 240 minutes (P < .05). No change in VR were seen at any time point. In multivariate regression, body temperature was the only characteristic independently associated with changes in MAP (coefficient 4.95, 95% CI 1.6-8.3). Conclusion: Administration of propofol during TTM did not affect cvSOFA score. The reductions in SBP, MAP, and HR did not have a corresponding change in vasopressor requirements and are likely not clinically meaningful. Propofol appears to be a safe choice for sedation in patients receiving targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest.

Discrimination experienced by Asian Canadian and Asian American health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Asian Canadians and Asian Americans face COVID-19-related discrimination. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of Asian health care workers dealing with discrimination, with a focus on racial micro-agressions, in Canada and the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We adopted a qualitative descriptive approach. We used convenience and snowball sampling strategies to recruit participants. We conducted individual, in-depth semistructured interviews with Asian health care workers in Canada and the US via videoconferencing between May and September 2020. Eligible participants had to self-identify as Asian and be currently employed as a health care worker with at least 1 year of full-time employment. We used an inductive thematic approach to analyze the data. RESULTS: Thirty participants were recruited. Fifteen (50%) were Canadians and 15 (50%) were Americans; there were 18 women (60%), 11 men (37%) and 1 nonbinary person. Most of the participants were aged 25-29 years (n = 16, 53%). More than half were nurses (n = 16, 53%); the other participants were attending physicians (n = 5), physiotherapists (n = 3), resident physicians (n = 2), a midwife, a paramedic, a pharmacist and a physician assistant. Two themes emerged from the data: a surge of racial microaggressions related to COVID-19 and a lack of institutional and public acknowledgement. Participants noted that they have experienced an increase in racial microaggressions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have also experienced threats of violence and actual violence. The largely silent organizational response to the challenges being faced by people of Asian descent and the use of disparaging terms such as "China virus" in the early stages of the pandemic were a substantial source of frustration. INTERPRETATION: Asian health care workers have experienced challenges in dealing with racial microaggressions related to COVID-19 in the US and Canada. More research should be done on the experiences of Asian Americans and Asian Canadians, both during and after the pandemic, and supportive measures should be put in place to protect Asian health care workers.