Performance evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B antigens using mid-turbinate nasal swabs.

The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel (Abbott) is an in vitro diagnostic rapid test designed for the qualitative detection of nucleocapsid proteins SARS-CoV-2 and nucleoprotein influenza A and B antigens in nasal mid-turbinate (NMT) swab specimens from symptomatic individuals meeting COVID-19 and influenza clinical and/or epidemiological criteria. This study, the largest global one to date using fresh samples, aimed to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel in freshly collected NMT swab specimens from individuals suspected of respiratory viral infection consistent with COVID-19 and/or influenza within the first 5 days of symptom onset compared with results obtained with the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B qualitative assay (cobas 6800/8800 systems), which were tested using nasopharyngeal swab samples. A total of 512 evaluable subjects were enrolled in the COVID-19 cohort across 18 sites, and 1,148 evaluable subjects were enrolled in the influenza cohort across 22 sites in the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and the USA. The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 99.7% for COVID-19. For influenza A, the sensitivity and specificity rates were 80.6% and 99.3%, respectively. Likewise, for influenza B, the sensitivity and specificity rates were 80.8% and 99.4%, respectively. In conclusion, the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel emerges as a suitable rapid test for detecting COVID-19 and influenza in symptomatic subjects across diverse global populations, exhibiting high sensitivity. The assay achieved a sensitivity of 94.4% in samples with Ct ≤24 for COVID-19 and 92.6% in samples with Ct ≤30 for influenza A and B. IMPORTANCE: The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel is a suitable rapid test for detecting COVID-19 and influenza in symptomatic subjects across diverse global populations, exhibiting high sensitivity. The assay achieved a sensitivity of 94.0% in samples with Ct ≤24 for COVID-19 and 92.6% in samples with Ct ≤30 for influenza A and B.

Rapid Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Cultures Using a Fully Automated Multiplex PCR Assay.

This study assessed the performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel in identifying microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles in positive blood cultures (BCs) and its influence on turnaround time (TAT) compared with conventional culture methods. We obtained 117 positive BCs, of these, 102 (87.2%) were correctly identified using BCID2. The discordance was due to off-panel pathogens detected by culture (n = 13), and additional pathogens identified by BCID2 (n = 2). On-panel pathogen concordance between the conventional culture and BCID2 methods was 98.1% (102/104). The conventional method detected 19 carbapenemase-producing organisms, 14 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, 18 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., and four vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. BCID2 correctly predicted 53 (96.4%) of 55 phenotypic resistance patterns by detecting AMR genes. The TAT for BCID2 was significantly lower than that for the conventional method. BCID2 rapidly identifies pathogens and AMR genes in positive BCs.

Evaluation of Multiplex Rapid Antigen Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B in Respiratory Samples.

BACKGROUND: There is little data about the performance of multiplex rapid antigen tests (RATs) on the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A (Flu A), and influenza B (Flu B). This study is to evaluate the performance of Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel (Abbott Diagnostics, Korea) and analyze the factors influencing its sensitivity. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and stored at the Korea University Anam hospital. In total, 400 residual samples from nasopharyngeal swabs were examined. The diagnostic accuracy of RAT was compared to that of RT-qPCR using the Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). RESULTS: Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B rapid panel showed the sensitivities of 88.0%, 92.0%, and 100% for SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, and Flu B, respectively, and specificities of 100% for all. The agreements with previously licensed single-plex RATs were shown to be high. In the analysis of variables affecting sensitivity, inappropriate sampling time after symptom onset (STASO) and high cycle threshold (Ct value) were shown to negatively affect the sensi-tivity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the multiplex RAT is useful for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B, but more clinical studies are needed.

Comparison of Neutralizing Activity between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Infected with Delta, Omicron BA.1, or Omicron BA.2 Variant.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the immune response to evolving viral strains is crucial for evidence-informed public health strategies. The main objective of this study is to assess the influence of vaccination on the neutralizing activity of SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron infection against various SARS-CoV-2 variants. METHODS: A total of 97 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were included. To assess the influence of vaccination on neutralizing activity, we measured the neutralizing activity of SARS-CoV-2 delta or omicron (BA.1 or BA.2) infection against wild-type (WT), delta, BA.1, and BA.2, with the results stratified based on vaccination status. RESULTS: The neutralizing activity against the WT, delta, and omicron variants (BA.1 and BA.2) was significantly higher in the vaccinated patients than those in the unvaccinated patients. In the unvaccinated individuals infected with the delta variant, the decrease in binding to BA.1 and BA.2 was statistically significant (3.9- and 2.7-fold, respectively) compared to the binding to delta. In contrast, vaccination followed by delta breakthrough infection improved the cross-neutralizing activity against omicron variants, with only 1.3- and 1.2-fold decreases in BA.1 and BA.2, respectively. Vaccination followed by infection improved cross-neutralizing activity against WT, delta, and BA.2 variants in patients infected with the BA.1 variant, compared to that in unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination followed by delta or BA.1 infection is associated with improved cross-neutralizing activity against different SARS-CoV-2 variants. The enhanced protection provided by breakthrough infections could have practical implications for optimizing vaccination strategies.

Evaluation of a New Chemiluminescent Immunoassay-Based Interferon-Gamma Release Assay for Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new chemiluminescent immunoassay-based tuberculosis (TB) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA (LG Chem Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea), for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in comparison with T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK). Materials and Methods: Between June 2021 and December 2021, 125 non-duplicate blood specimens were collected from adult volunteers; each subject received both tests concurrently. Total agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were used to calculate concordance. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to examine the correlation between interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels in AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA and spot counts in T-SPOT.TB. Results: The IGRA findings of the two assays revealed 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.2-94.8) total agreement with κ of 0.740 (95% CI = 0.595-0.885), showing substantial agreement between the two tests. Additionally, the amount of IFN-γ in AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA increased with the spot counts in T-SPOT.TB (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our research revealed that the results of the AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA were comparable to those of T-SPOT.TB.

HPLC-MS/MS Method Validation for Antifungal Agents in Human Serum in Clinical Application.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal drugs is recommended. LC-MS/MS outperforms bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for TDM. In this study, we validated TDM for voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole using HPLC-MS/MS with the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method. METHODS: For the validation of LC-MS/MS for antifungal TDM, accuracy, precision, linearity, carryover, lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), ion suppression, and sample stability tests were performed according to the guidelines of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: The LC-MS/MS triazole method showed that all analytes had biases less than 8.9% and coefficients of variation (CV) less than 7.7%. The linearity was validated over the ranges of 0.20 to 5.86 mg/L for voriconazole, 0.12 to 4.96 mg/L for posaconazole, 0.09 to 1.85 mg/L for itraconazole, and 0.12 to 2.38 mg/L for OH-itraconazole. Ion suppression and carryover were negligible. The lower limits of quantitation (LLOQs) for voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and OH-itraconazole were 0.114 mg/L, 0.206 mg/L, 0.118 mg/L, and 0.065 mg/L, respectively. Voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and OH-itraconazole can be stored at 4℃ for 4 - 7 days, according to sample stability. Sample preparation took < 15 minutes per batch, and analytical run time was 5 minutes per sample. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a simple, reliable, and quick LC-MS/MS method for triazole antifungal agents TDM suitable for routine hospital practice.

Evaluation of a sterile, filter-based, in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using positive blood culture.

This study aimed to assess the performance of our in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using a positive blood culture (BC) broth. For Gram-negative bacteria, 4 mL of BC broth was aspirated and passed through a Sartorius Minisart syringe filter with a pore size of 5 µm. The filtrate was then centrifuged and washed. A small volume of the pellet was used for ID, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and for AST, using automated broth microdilution. For Gram-positive cocci, 4 mL of BC broth was passed through the Minisart syringe filter. Then, 4 mL of sterile distilled water was injected in the direction opposite to that of the filtration to collect the bacterial residue trapped in the filter. Compared with the conventional method performed with pure colonies on agar plates, 94.0% (234/249) were correctly identified using the in-house method, with rates of 91.4% (127/139) and 97.3% (107/110) for Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates, respectively. Of 234 correctly identified isolates, 230 were assessed by AST. Categorical agreement and essential agreement were 93.3% and 94.5%, respectively, with a minor error rate of 3.8%, a major error rate of 3.4%, and a very major error rate of 1.6%. Our in-house preparation method showed good performance in rapid direct ID and AST using positive BC broths compared to the conventional method. This simple method can shorten the conventional turnaround time for ID and AST by at least 1 day, potentially contributing to better patient management.

Assessment of Omitting MacConkey Agar as a Primary Inoculating Medium for MALDI-TOF MS-Based Bacterial Identification from Urine, Blood, and Respiratory Samples.

OBJECTIVE: MacConkey agar (MAC) is commonly used as a primary medium for conventional bacterial identification in clinical microbiology laboratories. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has revolutionized microbial identification and is considered a reliable identification tool. While conventional identification methods rely on colony characteristics, MALDI-TOF MS requires a pure isolate on a solid medium. METHODS: This study investigated whether MAC can be omitted as a routine inoculation medium for urine, lower respiratory tract (LRT), and positive blood culture samples. The study included 462 clinical samples. Among these, 221 were urine samples, 141 were positive blood cultures, and the remaining 100 were LRT samples. The samples were inoculated on blood agar (BA) and MAC for the control group and on BA only for the experimental group, followed by incubation and identification with MALDI-TOF MS. RESULTS: The BA only group showed the same microbial identification using MALDI-TOF MS as the control BA and MAC groups for blood and LRT specimens. For urine samples, 99.1% (219/221) of the samples produced the same identification results for the two groups. The cause of discrepant results for two urine specimens was due to Proteus species overgrowth on BA, which hindered non-Proteus spp. identification for the BA-only group. CONCLUSION: Our results may indicate that omitting MAC has little or no impact on the recovery of organisms present in culture. However, due to possible Proteus spp. overgrowth, caution should be exercised in the decision to omit MAC from the primary inoculating medium, which necessitates further studies in other centers with a larger sample size.

Isolation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea, 2016 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: There is a global increase in isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). The aim of the study was to analyze longitudinal trends of NTM identification and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. METHODS: NTM recovery rates, distribution of NTM species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of NTM at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 52,456 specimens from 21,264 patients were submitted for mycobacterial culture, of which 2,521 from 1,410 patients were NTM positive over five years (January 2016 to December 2020). NTM isolation showed an increasing trend from 2016 to 2020 (p<0.001, test for trend) mainly caused by Mycobacterium avium complex. The vast majority of M. avium complex were susceptible to key agents clarithromycin and amikacin. For Mycobacterium kansasii, resistance to rifampin and clarithromycin is rare. Amikacin was the most effective drug against Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies abscessus and Mycobacterium subspecies massiliense. Most of M. subspecies massiliense were susceptible to clarithromycin, while the majority of M. abscessus subspecies abscessus were resistant to clarithromycin (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was an increasing trend of NTM isolation in our hospital. Resistance to key drugs was uncommon for most NTM species except for M. abscessus subspecies abscessus against clarithromycin.

Usefulness of Combining Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Samples for Viral Detection by Reverse Transcriptase PCR in Adults Hospitalized with Acute Respiratory Illness.

Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) or washings have traditionally been used to diagnose respiratory tract infections. Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) is widely used for rapid viral detection using samples from the upper respiratory tract. However, RT-PCR is rarely applied to sputum samples, mainly due to the viscosity of sputum. Thus, we assessed the detection rates of respiratory viruses from NPS, sputum samples, and combined NPS and sputum samples using multiplex RT-PCR (Allplex respiratory panels I, II, and III; Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). Paired NPS and sputum samples were collected from 219 patients admitted to the hospital with acute respiratory illnesses from October to December 2019. RT-PCR was performed on each sample for virus detection. Combined samples for virus detection were produced using remnant NPS and sputum samples with a positive virus signal. Respiratory viral nucleic acid was identified in 92 (42%) of 219 patients. Among the 92 viral detections, 61 (28%) were detected by both NPS and sputum samples. Twenty-four (11%) were sputum positive/NPS negative, and seven (3%) were sputum negative/NPS positive. For the combined NPS-sputum samples (n = 92), all paired samples positive in both specimens (n = 61) were also positive in the combined NPS-sputum sample. Twenty-seven (87%) of the 31 discordant paired samples were positive in the combined samples. Out of the total of 103 viruses identified before combining the samples, the detection rate of the combined samples was 94% (97/103), which was higher than the detection rates of sputum (88%; 91/103) and NPS (71%; 73/103). Because additional tests incur additional costs, our findings suggest that combining samples instead of testing separate samples using RT-PCR is likely the most cost-effective method of viral testing for patients with acute respiratory illnesses. IMPORTANCE This study reveals that RT-PCR utilizing sputum significantly increased the detection rate for respiratory viral nucleic acids among adult patients admitted to the hospital, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS). Notably, combined samples of sputum and NPS maintained the majority of the improved sputum detection rate with only a few positive signal losses from NPS samples. In order to detect respiratory viruses in adult patients with acute respiratory illness, it is important to choose the optimal respiratory samples. This study helped to improve our understanding of this process.

Temporary Cessation of Immunosuppression for Infection May Contribute to the Development of Graft-vs-Host Disease After ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) after liver transplantation is a rare complication with a high mortality rate. A complex interplay between donor and recipient immunity plays a role in the development of GVHD. Infection following liver transplantation is one of the most common complications in a recipient of an organ transplant who is immunosuppressed. On clinical signs of infection, the immune reaction of the recipient can be reconstituted by withdrawal of immunosuppression in order to help combat infection. However, the discontinuation of immunosuppression could restore the donor's immune activity rather than that of the recipient. There is little information available as to whether the discontinuation of immunosuppression for severe infection could contribute to the development of GVHD in a patient who underwent ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Herein, we present a unique case of GVHD following ABO-I LDLT, for which the cessation of immunosuppression could be responsible.