RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the clinical impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is scarce and conflicting, even though atezolizumab became the first PD-L1 inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years for the initial treatment of extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC. METHODS: We investigated PD-L1 expression in SCLC tumors using the three validated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays (SP263, SP142, and 22C3) and assessed the correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological factors to determine the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression. The three PD-L1 IHC analyses were prospectively used to assess tumor samples of patients with SCLC at diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the total of 59 patients, 47 patients received the active treatment beyond platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution. PD-L1 expression was positive in 39.0% with SP263, 37.3% with SP142, and 22.0% with 22C3. In a univariate analysis, the positive result of at least one of the three PD-L1 assays and the positive result of the SP142 assay were associated with longer overall survival (OS). A multivariable analysis confirmed that performance status, stage, and the SP142 assay were independent predictors of OS. In subgroup analysis, these results revealed more significant prognostic factors in ES than in limited-stage (LS). In patients with SCLC, especially those with ES, the expression of the SP142 assay is a significant independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results need to be further validated in larger cohorts, this information will benefit clinicians and patients in determining the immunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC.
RESUMO
The optimum sequence of bronchial brushing and washing for diagnosing peripheral lung cancer, defined as an invisible endobronchial tumour, is not clear and requires further study. We prospectively obtained washing samples after brushing in patients with peripheral lung tumours during non-guided flexible bronchoscopy (FB) to investigate the diagnostic yield of these samples and conducted a retrospective review of the prospectively collected data. The study included 166 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The overall diagnostic yield of bronchial brushing and washing for peripheral lung cancer was 52.4%. The diagnostic yields of brushing and washing were 37.3% and 46.4%, respectively, and that of washing was superior according to McNemar's test (p = 0.017, κ = 0.570). Furthermore, washing was diagnostic, whereas brushing was not, in 15.1% of all cases. Comparison of positive washing cytology (brushing) with the respective pathological diagnosis yielded a concordance rate of 88.3% (90.3%), with κ = 0.769 (0.801) (p < 0.001). Performing washing after brushing during non-guided FB is a very safe, cost-effective procedure that may help improve the diagnostic yield in patients with suspected peripheral lung cancer. Our information will also benefit clinicians performing diagnostic bronchoscopy in patients with suspected peripheral lung cancer when fluoroscopic guidance or advanced bronchoscopy techniques are not available.
