Contribution of Afferent Feedback to Adaptive Hindlimb Walking in Cats: A Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Study.

Mammalian locomotion is generated by central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord, which produce alternating flexor and extensor activities controlling the locomotor movements of each limb. Afferent feedback signals from the limbs are integrated by the CPGs to provide adaptive control of locomotion. Responses of CPG-generated neural activity to afferent feedback stimulation have been previously studied during fictive locomotion in immobilized cats. Yet, locomotion in awake, behaving animals involves dynamic interactions between central neuronal circuits, afferent feedback, musculoskeletal system, and environment. To study these complex interactions, we developed a model simulating interactions between a half-center CPG and the musculoskeletal system of a cat hindlimb. Then, we analyzed the role of afferent feedback in the locomotor adaptation from a dynamic viewpoint using the methods of dynamical systems theory and nullcline analysis. Our model reproduced limb movements during regular cat walking as well as adaptive changes of these movements when the foot steps into a hole. The model generates important insights into the mechanism for adaptive locomotion resulting from dynamic interactions between the CPG-based neural circuits, the musculoskeletal system, and the environment.

Analysis of pharmacogenomic factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can lead to a significant deterioration in the quality of life of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether ABCB1 2677G > T/A was associated with complete response (CR; defined as no vomiting and no rescue medication) in acute phase (CR0-24), as well as to explore the genetic factors affecting delayed phase (CR24-120) CINV in cancer patients treated with a standard triple antiemetic regimen that included aprepitant. METHODS: This prospective single-center study included a total of 166 chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer who received a standard dose of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy; granisetron, dexamethasone, and aprepitant were administered prior to chemotherapy. CR0-24 was compared between minor allele homozygous (TT, AA, and TA) and major allele homozygous plus heterozygous (GG, GA, and GT) groups of ABCB1 2677G > T/A. In addition, 14 genetic polymorphisms were genotyped and their associations with CRs were investigated. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who achieved CR0-24, which was the primary endpoint of this study, was 59% in the minor allele homozygous and 61% in the major allele homozygous plus heterozygous groups of ABCB1 2677G > T/A. Although this difference was not statistically significant, multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential risk factors showed that TACR1 1323TT (OR, 2.57; P = 0.014) was a significant determinant of CR24-120. CONCLUSION: No significant association was found between ABCB1 2677G > T/A and CR0-24. However, it was observed that the polymorphism of TACR1, which encodes the neurokinin 1 receptor, might be a potential genetic risk factor for the development of delayed phase CINV.

The influence of family adaptability and cohesion on anxiety and depression of terminally ill cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of family members on terminally ill cancer patients by measuring the relationship of the presence of the family caregivers, visiting time by family and friends, and family adaptability and cohesion with patient's anxiety and depression. METHODS: From June, 2016 to March, 2017, 100 terminally ill cancer patients who were admitted to a palliative care unit in Seoul, South Korea, were surveyed, and their medical records were reviewed. The Korean version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III and Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale was used. Chi-square and multiple logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: The results of the chi-square analysis showed that the presence of family caregivers and family visit times did not have statistically significant effects on anxiety and depression in terminally ill cancer patients. In multiple logistic regression, when adjusted for age, sex, ECOG PS, and the monthly average income, the odds ratios (ORs) of the low family adaptability to anxiety and depression were 2.4 (1.03-5.83) and 5.4 (1.10-26.87), respectively. The OR of low family cohesion for depression was 5.4 (1.10-27.20) when adjusted for age, sex, ECOG PS, and monthly average household income. CONCLUSIONS: A higher family adaptability resulted in a lower degree of anxiety and depression in terminally ill cancer patients. The higher the family cohesion, the lower the degree of depression in the patient. The presence of the family caregiver and the visiting time by family and friends did not affect the patient's anxiety and depression.