Differential Virulence Contributions of the Efflux Transporter MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas syringae Infecting a Variety of Host Plants.

Efflux transporters such as MexAB-OprM contribute to bacterial resistance to diverse antimicrobial compounds. Here, we show that MexB contributes to epiphytic and late-stage apoplastic growth of Pseudomonas syringae strain B728a, as well as lesion formation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Although a ∆mexB mutant formed fewer lesions after topical application to common bean, these lesions contain the same number of cells (105 to 107 cells) as those caused by the wild-type strain. The internalized population size of both the wild-type and the ∆mexB mutant within small samples of surface-sterilized asymptomatic portions of leaves varied from undetectably low to as high as 105 cells/cm2. Localized bacterial populations within individual lesions consistently exceeded 105 cells/cm2. Strain B728a was capable of moderate to extensive apoplastic growth in diverse host plants, including lima bean (P. lunatus), fava bean (Vicia faba), pepper (Capsicum annuum), Nicotiana benthamiana, sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), but MexB was not required for growth in a subset of these plant species. A model is proposed that MexB provides resistance to as-yet-unidentified antimicrobials that differ between plant species. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license.

CLIP and Massively Parallel Functional Analysis of CELF6 Reveal a Role in Destabilizing Synaptic Gene mRNAs through Interaction with 3' UTR Elements.

CELF6 is a CELF-RNA-binding protein, and thus part of a protein family with roles in human disease; however, its mRNA targets in the brain are largely unknown. Using cross-linking immunoprecipitation and sequencing (CLIP-seq), we define its CNS targets, which are enriched for 3' UTRs in synaptic protein-coding genes. Using a massively parallel reporter assay framework, we test the consequence of CELF6 expression on target sequences, with and without mutating putative binding motifs. Where CELF6 exerts an effect on sequences, it is largely to decrease RNA abundance, which is reversed by mutating UGU-rich motifs. This is also the case for CELF3-5, with a protein-dependent effect on magnitude. Finally, we demonstrate that targets are derepressed in CELF6-mutant mice, and at least two key CNS proteins, FOS and FGF13, show altered protein expression levels and localization. Our works find, in addition to previously identified roles in splicing, that CELF6 is associated with repression of its CNS targets via the 3' UTR in vivo.

Synthetic and genomic regulatory elements reveal aspects of cis-regulatory grammar in mouse embryonic stem cells.

In embryonic stem cells (ESCs), a core transcription factor (TF) network establishes the gene expression program necessary for pluripotency. To address how interactions between four key TFs contribute to cis-regulation in mouse ESCs, we assayed two massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) libraries composed of binding sites for SOX2, POU5F1 (OCT4), KLF4, and ESRRB. Comparisons between synthetic cis-regulatory elements and genomic sequences with comparable binding site configurations revealed some aspects of a regulatory grammar. The expression of synthetic elements is influenced by both the number and arrangement of binding sites. This grammar plays only a small role for genomic sequences, as the relative activities of genomic sequences are best explained by the predicted occupancy of binding sites, regardless of binding site identity and positioning. Our results suggest that the effects of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) are influenced by the order and orientation of sites, but that in the genome the overall occupancy of TFs is the primary determinant of activity.

Transcription factors are proteins that flip genetic switches; their role is to control when and where genes are active. They do this by binding to short stretches of DNA called cis-regulatory sequences. Each sequence can have several binding sites for different transcription factors, but it is largely unclear whether the transcription factors binding to the same regulatory sequence actually work together. It is possible that each transcription factor may work independently and there only needs to be critical mass of transcription factors bound to throw the genetic switch. If this is the case, the most important features of a cis-regulatory sequence should be the number of binding sites it contains, and how tightly the transcription factors bind to those sites. The more transcription factors and the more strongly they bind, the more active the gene should be. An alternative option is that certain transcription factors may work better together, enhancing each other's effects such that the total effect is more than the sum of its parts. If this is true, the order, orientation and spacing of the binding sites within a sequence should matter more than the number. One way to investigate to distinguish between these possibilities is to study mouse embryonic stem cells, which have a core set of four transcription factors. Looking directly at a real genome, however, can be confusing and it is difficult to measure the effects of different cis-regulatory sequences because genes differ in so many other ways. To tackle this problem, King et al. created a synthetic set of cis-regulatory sequences based on the four core transcription factors found in mouse stem cells. The synthetic set had every combination of two, three or four of the binding sites, with each site either facing forwards or backwards along the DNA strand. King et al. attached each of the synthetic cis-regulatory sequences to a reporter gene to find out how well each sequence performed. This revealed that the cis-regulatory sequences with the most binding sites and the tightest binding affinities work best, suggesting that transcription factors mainly work independently. There was evidence of some interaction between some transcription factors, because, of the synthetic sequences with four binding sites, some worked better than others, and there were patterns in the most effective binding site combinations. However, these effects were small and when King et al. went on to test sequences from the real mouse genome, the most important factor by far was the number of binding sites. Synthetic libraries of DNA sequences allow researchers to examine gene regulation more clearly than is possible in real genomes. Yet this approach does have its limitations and it is impossible to capture every type of cis-regulatory sequence in one library. The next step to extend this work is to combine the two approaches, taking sequences from the real genome and manipulating them one by one. This could help to unravel the rules that govern how cis-regulatory sequences work in real cells.

LIN-42, the Caenorhabditis elegans PERIOD homolog, negatively regulates microRNA transcription.

During C. elegans development, microRNAs (miRNAs) function as molecular switches that define temporal gene expression and cell lineage patterns in a dosage-dependent manner. It is critical, therefore, that the expression of miRNAs be tightly regulated so that target mRNA expression is properly controlled. The molecular mechanisms that function to optimize or control miRNA levels during development are unknown. Here we find that mutations in lin-42, the C. elegans homolog of the circadian-related period gene, suppress multiple dosage-dependent miRNA phenotypes including those involved in developmental timing and neuronal cell fate determination. Analysis of mature miRNA levels in lin-42 mutants indicates that lin-42 functions to attenuate miRNA expression. Through the analysis of transcriptional reporters, we show that the upstream cis-acting regulatory regions of several miRNA genes are sufficient to promote highly dynamic transcription that is coupled to the molting cycles of post-embryonic development. Immunoprecipitation of LIN-42 complexes indicates that LIN-42 binds the putative cis-regulatory regions of both non-coding and protein-coding genes and likely plays a role in regulating their transcription. Consistent with this hypothesis, analysis of miRNA transcriptional reporters in lin-42 mutants indicates that lin-42 regulates miRNA transcription. Surprisingly, strong loss-of-function mutations in lin-42 do not abolish the oscillatory expression patterns of lin-4 and let-7 transcription but lead to increased expression of these genes. We propose that lin-42 functions to negatively regulate the transcriptional output of multiple miRNAs and mRNAs and therefore coordinates the expression levels of genes that dictate temporal cell fate with other regulatory programs that promote rhythmic gene expression.