Injury patterns in professional arena football.

BACKGROUND: No studies to date have evaluated the injury patterns in professional arena football. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of general injury patterns in the Arena Football League. HYPOTHESES: (1) Game injury rates are higher than are practice injury rates, (2) a small number of injuries are related to collision with the boards, and (3) athletes playing on both offense and defense have higher injury rates than do athletes playing either offense or defense alone. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: A retrospective review of injury data including 1199 injuries over a 4-year period from February 2002 to December 2005, inclusive of preseason and postseason practices and competition, was conducted. Data regarding the injured body part, position of the player, nature of injury, mechanism of injury, missed playing time, playing surface, and when the injury occurred were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Injury rates during practice were 14.6 injuries per 1000 exposures and game injury rates were 111.3 per 1000 exposures. Few recorded injuries (2.2%) involved a collision with the sideline boards. CONCLUSION: Game injury rates are higher than are practice injury rates. Athletes playing on both offense and defense did not have higher injury rates in games than did athletes playing either offense or defense. The sideline boards used in the Arena Football League did not appear to contribute dramatically to the injury rates. Despite the differences between arena and stadium football, Arena Football League injury patterns are similar to published collegiate football injury patterns.

Assessment of reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of contaminants on, as well as the quality of, reprocessed shaver blades. METHODS: We assessed 7 new shaver blades and 27 shaver blades that had been reprocessed with mechanical cleaning, functional testing, and sterilization with ethylene oxide. A spectrophotometer measured the amount of nucleic acid and protein. The blade quality was assessed by photographing the blades with magnification and determining the percentage of damage present on each blade. A subset of shaver blades were then used to cut meniscal tissue, and the cut surface was measured for smoothness by image processing and automated laser scanning cytometry. In evaluation of the meniscus, for the subset of shavers, an image processing value of 1 indicates a smooth, straight line, and values lower than 1 reflect deviations in the cut surface (the closer the value is to 1, the smoother the surface). Laser scanning cytometry values indicate the percentage of irregularities in the cut surface (the lower the value is, the smoother the surface). RESULTS: Of the 27 reprocessed shaver blades, 13 (48%) had detectable levels of protein and 17 (63%) had detectable levels of nucleic acid. On the reprocessed shaver blades, protein levels ranged from 2.43 microg to 60 microg and nucleic acid levels ranged from 0.40 microg to 3.5 microg. No new shaver blade had contaminants. Twenty reprocessed shaver blades had been manufactured with teeth and could be evaluated for visible damage. Of these, 10 had 1% to 25% damage, 5 had 26% to 50% damage, 3 had 51% to 75% damage, and 2 had 76% to 100% damage. The new blades had no visible damage. Image processing revealed smoothness of the surface cut with new shaver blades, yielding values of 1 +/- 0.12, whereas the values for reprocessed shaver blades ranged from 0.62 +/- 0.02 to 1 +/- 0.07. Laser scanning cytometry values ranged from 3.3% to 7.1% for the new blades as compared with 5.8% to 20.0% for the reprocessed blades. CONCLUSIONS: Of the reprocessed shaver blades, 48% had detectable levels of protein and 63% had detectable levels of nucleic acid. All of the reprocessed blades visually evaluated showed some level of damage or wear, whereas no new blade had such damage. In addition, menisci cut with reprocessed shavers showed rougher edges than did menisci cut with new shavers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To make an informed decision regarding the use of reprocessed shaver blades, surgeons will want to know the level of contamination on, and the quality of, reprocessed shaver blades.

In vitro effects of 3 common arthroscopic instruments on articular cartilage.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare chondroplasty performed with an ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr (Mitek, Norwood, MA), a mechanical shaver, and a bipolar radiofrequency (RF) wand on articular cartilage-covered condyles taken from sheep cadavers that were induced to have an osteoarthritic-like condition, and corresponding healthy control tissue. TYPE OF STUDY: Experimental designed animal cadaveric, biochemical, and histologic study. METHODS: Sheep condyles were used as a source of articular cartilage. Femurs were extracted approximately 1 hour postmortem and a transverse section of the condyles was made. Half of the samples were treated to induce an osteoarthritic-like condition. The condyles were then subjected to chondroplasty performed with the ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr, a mechanical shaver, and a bipolar RF wand under sterile saline solution by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Twenty cross-sections from each condyle were examined by confocal microscopy to measure smoothness and depth of tissue damage to the articular cartilage caused by each of the 3 instruments. RESULTS: The ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr and the bipolar RF wand left a smoother surface on the articular cartilage compared with the mechanical shaver. Additionally, the ExoJet fluid-burr caused slightly less tissue damage to the cartilage than the bipolar RF wand, both of which were less damaging than the shaver. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedists have multiple choices for surgical instruments used on cartilage. However, the effect on the integrity of the cartilage left remaining at the knee was previously unknown. Based on this study, a fluid-burr appears to leave the cartilage with a smaller zone of injury than does the RF wand or shaver. It also leaves the cartilage surface smoother than the shaver. During surgical procedures, minimizing cartilage breakdown and smooth remaining surfaces are desired because they minimize the vulnerable tissue to further destruction. A fluid burr leaves cartilage with less injury and with a smoother surface than do more traditional surgical instruments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information should help surgeons in their selection of currently available surgical instruments and should aid engineers in the design of future instruments that function to modify articular cartilage.

Shaver, bipolar radiofrequency, and saline jet instruments for cutting meniscal tissue: a comparative experimental study on sheep menisci.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of meniscal tissue cut with 3 different surgical instruments (traditional shavers, bipolar radiofrequency (RF) wands, and a high-pressure saline jet) and that of control menisci. TYPE OF STUDY: Experimental design, biochemical and histologic study. METHODS: Sixty samples of sheep menisci were separated into 4 groups. Three groups were shaved on the apical surface with the different instruments. The smoothness of the cut surfaces was evaluated visually by an orthopaedic surgeon and then scored by laser scanning cytometry and by line measurement analysis. The depth of tissue damage was measured by fluorescent cytochemistry. Means and standard deviations were calculated and comparative statistics used (P < .05). RESULTS: The edges cut by the saline jet and bipolar RF were significantly smoother when judged by the surgeon than those cut by traditional shaver. There was no significant difference between the saline jet and bipolar RF. There were no significant differences in smoothness when measured by laser scanning cytometry or by line measurement techniques. The control menisci had less depth of damage along the edge as measured by fluorescent cytochemistry than did any of the menisci cut with the instrument. The saline jet had significantly less depth of damage than did the shaver. No other significant differences existed between the instruments for depth of damage. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our investigation conclude that high-pressure saline instruments may cause less damage to residual meniscal tissue when compared with bipolar RF and shavers. Saline jets and bipolar RF also produce a smoother cut than shavers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons may want to consider the degree of residual damage to meniscal tissue from the application of various surgical instruments. Saline jets may be a superior cutting instrument than RF or shavers when considering depth of residual damage and smoothness of residual meniscal edges.