Low-fidelity hybrid sexual assault simulation training's effect on the comfort and competency of resident physicians.

BACKGROUND: Alternative training methods are needed for resident physicians to ensure that care is not compromised should they practice in settings without well-established Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a simulation-based sexual assault response course for resident physicians at an institution without an on-site SANE program. METHODS: Educational intervention study of 12 emergency medicine residents using a low-fidelity hybrid simulation model. The study was comprised of eight male and four female physicians at a military medical center in San Diego, CA. Assessment occurred using three separate metrics. The first was a written knowledge test. The second was a simulated interview and evidentiary examination. These metrics were given 1 month before and 3 months after an 8-h training course. The final metric was Likert-scale questionnaires surveying pre- and post-course feelings of competency and comfort. RESULTS: The emergency medicine residents showed a 13% improvement (95% confidence interval [CI] 7-20%) in written examination scores pre and post intervention. Post-course interview and examinations reflected a 44% improvement (95% CI 24-64%) in critical action completion. Pre-course comfort and competency questionnaires were a median of 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) on a Likert Scale. Post-course survey responses were a median of 4 (IQR 2-5). CONCLUSIONS: Low-fidelity hybrid simulation is a useful tool to train inexperienced physicians to perform evidentiary examinations and interviews without sacrificing the privacy and direct care of sexual assault victims.

Negative predictive value of acetaminophen concentrations within four hours of ingestion.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to ascertain whether acetaminophen (APAP) concentrations less than 100 µg/mL obtained between 1 and 4 hours after acute ingestion accurately predict a nontoxic 4-hour concentration. METHODS: The authors performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study involving five emergency departments (EDs) participating in the ToxIC Research Network. Data were collected from May 2009 to December 2011. Patients with APAP concentrations <100 µg/mL drawn between 1 and 4 hours after acute ingestions, and concentrations drawn 4 or more hours after ingestions, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included initial concentration >100 µg/mL, initial APAP concentration drawn prior to 1 hour, two undetectable APAP concentrations, the second concentration drawn prior to 4 hours, and unknown time of ingestion. Toxic concentrations 4 or more hours after ingestion were defined as concentrations that plotted above the 150 µg/mL line on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. RESULTS: Data were collected on 83 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of the 83 patients with APAP concentrations <100 µg/mL between 1 and 4 hours, one patient (1.2%) had a ≥ 4-hour toxic concentration. Negative predictive value (NPV) for an APAP concentration <100 µg/mL obtained between 1 and 4 hours after an acute ingestion was 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 93.5% to 99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: An APAP concentration of <100 µg/mL obtained between 1 and 4 hours after ingestion has a high NPV for excluding toxic ingestion. We do not recommend reliance on concentrations obtained between 1 and 4 hours to exclude toxicity, because of a potential false-negative rate of 6.5%.

Serum progesterone testing to predict ectopic pregnancy in symptomatic first-trimester patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to prospectively measure the accuracy of serum progesterone levels to detect ectopic pregnancy. METHODS: Seven hundred sixteen symptomatic first-trimester emergency department patients with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding at a tertiary care military teaching hospital had progesterone levels measured by radioimmunoassay with results unavailable to the treating physician. All patients were monitored until a criterion standard diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy was confirmed. RESULTS: A 14-month derivation phase (n=399) used receiver operating characteristic curve testing to select a cutoff value of progesterone less than 22 ng/mL. A 12-month validation phase (n=317) then retested this cutoff value. Combining both phases, there were 434 (61%) viable intrauterine pregnancies, 229 (32%) nonviable intrauterine pregnancies, and 52 (7. 3%) ectopic pregnancies, of which 17 were ruptured. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values (95% confidence intervals) for progesterone levels less than 22 ng/mL to detect ectopic pregnancy were 100% (94% to 100%), 27% (23% to 30%), 10% (7% to 12%), and 100% (98% to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Given similar disease prevalence, roughly one fourth (178/716) of symptomatic patients can be classified as low risk (0%, 95% confidence interval 0 to 2%) for having an ectopic pregnancy using a progesterone cutoff of 22 ng/mL. Whether implementation of rapid progesterone testing can safely expedite care and reduce the need for urgent diagnostic evaluation or admission remains to be determined.