RESUMO
We performed a prospective observational audit to evaluate the application of the Lucas caesarean section urgency classification to assisted vaginal delivery in the operating theatre. We collected data from 400 women having category 1-3 delivery in the operating theatre. Twenty percent of the caesarean sections and 4% of the vaginal deliveries were category 1. The median (IQR) decision-delivery interval was 25 (19.5-37) min for category 1 caesarean section and 19.5 (15-29) min for category 1 vaginal delivery, and 43.5 (36-57) min and 45 (32-57) for category 2 caesarean section and vaginal delivery, respectively. Sixty-three percent of category 1 caesarean section and 75% of category 1 vaginal delivery were performed in ≤30 min. Antenatal or intrapartum risk factors were present before the decision for delivery in 82% of caesarean sections and 80% of vaginal deliveries. The application of the Lucas urgency classification to assisted vaginal delivery merits further evaluation.
Assuntos
Cesárea/classificação , Emergências/classificação , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoAssuntos
Idioma , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Adulto , Educação , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Gynecological laparoscopy is a commonly performed procedure. Providing anesthesia for this can present a challenge, particularly in the day surgery population. Poor analgesia, nausea, and vomiting can cause distress to the patient and increased cost for the health system, because of overnight admission. In this review we discuss anesthetic and analgesic techniques for day-case gynecological laparoscopy. The principles include multimodal analgesia, the use of the oral route wherever possible, and the contribution of the surgeon.
