[Eight Cases of Breast Cancer That Relapsed More Than Ten Years after Initial Treatment].

Recurrence is more common for breast cancer than other solid tumors. In the last 5 years, we experienced 8 cases that relapsed more than 10 years after initial treatment. All cases were hormone-sensitive and HER2-negative. The Ki-67 percentage score was less than 15% in 7 cases. The age range at recurrence was 56-93 years(mean, 74.6 years), and the time to recurrence was 10-14 years and 20 or more years in 6 and 2 cases(mean, 14.6 years), respectively. The triggers for diagnosis were subjective symptoms, follow-up, and examination for other diseases in 3, 3, and 2 cases, respectively. The recurrence sites included the axilla, pleura/lung, liver/lung, skin, and chest wall in 3, 2, 1, 1, and 1 case, respectively. Treatment included an aromatase inhibitor(AI)and AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor in 5 and 3 cases, respectively. The post-recurrence treatment period was 6-31 months(mean, 21.6 months), with 4 cases of PR, 3 cases of SD, and 1 case of death from other disease. There were 3 cases of axillary recurrence and 1 case each of neuropathic pain, upper limb edema, and local pain; all were alleviated by the treatment. In 2 cases, the pleural effusion decreased without chest tube drainage. Hormone receptor- positive late-relapse cases are generally highly therapeutically sensitive with favorable prognosis. In many cases, AI alone was selected considering patient age, side effects, treatment costs, and other factors.

Parenchyma-Sparing Hepatectomy with Vascular Reconstruction Techniques for Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases with Major Vascular Invasion.

BACKGROUND: Resectability of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) depends on major vascular involvement and is affected by chemotherapy-induced liver injury. Parenchyma-sparing with combined resection and reconstruction of involved vessels may expand the indications and safety of hepatectomy. METHODS: Of 92 patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM, 15 underwent major vascular resection and reconstruction. The reconstructed vessels were the portal vein (PV) in five cases, the major hepatic vein (HV) in nine cases, and the inferior vena cava in six cases. RESULTS: All PV reconstructions were direct anastomoses. The HV was reconstructed with an autologous inferior mesenteric venous patch or an external iliac vein interposition graft. Total hepatic vascular exclusion was performed for six patients. Of nine patients with HV reconstruction, three had tumors involving all three major HVs, in whom the left HV was reconstructed as an only vein after extended right hepatectomy. In another six patients, multiple bilobar tumors or tumors in the liver that had chemotherapy-induced injury involved one or two HVs. Parenchyma-sparing by reconstruction of the HV was performed to secure the residual liver function. The patients with vascular reconstruction had an operative time of 462 ± 111 min and a blood loss of 1278 ± 528 mL. No complication classified as Clavien-Dindo 3 or more developed. The median hospital stay was 17 days (range 8-26 days). The cumulative 5-year survival rate for all the patients was 54.6 %, with no significant difference according to vascular reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy combined with vascular reconstruction is a useful option to avoid major hepatectomy among various procedures for resection of CRLM with major vascular invasion.

Retrocaval liver lifting maneuver and modifications of total hepatic vascular exclusion for liver tumor resection.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of technical modifications of total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) for hepatectomy involving inferior vena cava (IVC). METHODS: Of 301 patients who underwent hepatectomy during the immediate previous 5-year period, 8 (2.7%) required THVE or modified methods of IVC cross-clamping for resection of liver tumors with massive involvement of the IVC. Seven of the patients had diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases and 1 had diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. All tumors involved the IVC, and THVE was unavoidable for combined resection of the IVC in all 8 of the patients. Technical modifications of THVE were applied to minimize the extent and duration of vascular occlusion, thereby reducing the risk of damage. RESULTS: Broad dissection of the space behind the IVC coupled with lifting up of the liver from the retrocaval space was effective for controlling bleeding around the IVC before and during THVE. The procedures facilitate modification of the positioning of the cranial IVC cross-clamp. Switching the cranial IVC cross-clamp from supra- to retrohepatic IVC or to the confluence of hepatic vein decreased duration of the THVE while restoring hepatic blood flow or systemic circulation via the IVC. Oblique cranial IVC cross-clamping avoided ischemia of the remnant hemi-liver. With these technical modifications, the mean duration of THVE was 13.4 ± 8.4 min, which was extremely shorter than that previously reported in the literature. Recovery of liver function was smooth and uneventful for all 8 patients. There was no case of mortality, re-operation, or severe complication (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade of III or more). CONCLUSION: The retrocaval liver lifting maneuver and modifications of cranial cross-clamping were useful for minimizing duration of THVE.