Mixing energy as an adjustment tool for aerodynamic behaviour of an inhaled product: In-vitro and in-vivo effects.

This paper describes the development of a fixed dose dry powder combination of indacaterol maleate (Inda) and glycopyrronium bromide (Glyco) in Easyhaler® inhaler for a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study, as well as the outcome of such a study. The development aim was to produce formulations with three different in vitro dispersibility profiles for both Inda and Glyco. This so-called 'rake' approach allows for quantitation of the candidate formulations relative to the reference product Ultibro® Breezhaler® in terms of the key PK parameters. Three formulations (A, B and C) were produced based on the mixing energy concept. For both APIs, formulation A (lowest mixing energy) displayed the highest fine particle fractions and formulation C (highest mixing energy) the lowest. GMP manufacturing confirmed the performance of the three formulations. The candidate formulations were tested against the reference product in a single dose PK study in healthy volunteers. Clear differences in Inda plasma concentration profiles were observed between the treatments when administered concomitantly with charcoal, with Easyhaler A showing the highest Cmax value and Easyhaler C the lowest. Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to Ultibro Breezhaler with regard to the primary PK parameters of Inda, Cmax and AUC72h. For Glyco, Easyhaler formulations A, B and C provided lower peak concentrations than Ultibro Breezhaler. For AUC72h of Glyco, Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to the reference product. Additional measures for adjustment of formulation performance can be foreseen, whose effects can be predicted based on mixing energy theory.

Pharmacokinetics of Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate Delivered in Combination via Easyhaler and Diskus Dry Powder Inhalers in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Easyhaler® dry powder inhaler (DPI) containing salmeterol and fluticasone propionate was developed for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three different Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler test products (Orion Pharma, Finland) were compared against the reference product Seretide® Diskus® DPI (GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom) to study whether any of the test products are bioequivalent with the reference. METHODS: Open and randomized pharmacokinetic four-period crossover study on 65 healthy volunteers was performed in a single center to compare the lung deposition and total systemic exposure of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate after administration of single doses (two inhalations of 50/500 µg/inhalation strength) in fasting conditions. Blood samples were drawn before dosing and at frequent time points between 2 minutes and 34 hours after dosing for determination of drug concentrations. The primary variables for total systemic exposure and lung deposition of fluticasone propionate were maximum concentration of the concentration-time curve (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sample with quantifiable concentration (AUCt). For salmeterol, the primary variables for total systemic exposure were Cmax and AUCt and for lung deposition Cmax and AUC up to 30 minutes after study treatment administration (AUC30min). RESULTS: One of the Easyhaler test products met all the criteria for bioequivalence with the reference. The 96.7% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test/reference ratios of fluticasone propionate Cmax and AUCt were 0.9901-1.1336 and 0.9448-1.0542, respectively. Ninety percent CIs for salmeterol Cmax, AUC30min, and AUCt ratios were 1.0567-1.2012, 1.0989-1.2255, and 1.0769-1.1829, respectively. Median salmeterol time to maximum concentration (tmax) was 4.0 minutes. Median fluticasone propionate tmax was from 1.5 to 2.0 hours. Terminal elimination half-life was 11 hours for salmeterol and 9-10 hours for fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler was shown to be bioequivalent with the reference product.

Equivalent Lung Dose and Systemic Exposure of Budesonide/Formoterol Combination via Easyhaler and Turbuhaler.

BACKGROUND: Easyhaler(®) device-metered dry powder inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol fumarate dihydrate (hereafter formoterol) for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been developed. The current approvals of the product in Europe were based on several pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) studies, and in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) modeling. METHODS: Four PK studies were performed to compare the lung deposition and total systemic exposure of budesonide and formoterol after administration of budesonide/formoterol Easyhaler and the reference product, Symbicort Turbuhaler. The products were administered concomitantly with oral charcoal (lung deposition) and in two of the studies also without charcoal (total systemic exposure). Demonstration of BE for lung deposition (surrogate marker for efficacy) and non-inferiority for systemic exposure (surrogate marker for safety) were considered a proof of therapeutic equivalence. In addition, IVIVC models were constructed to predict study outcomes with different reference product fine particle doses (FPDs). RESULTS: In the first pivotal study, the exposure and lung dose via Easyhaler were higher compared to the reference product (mean comparison estimates between 1.07 and 1.28) as the FPDs of the reference product batch were low. In the following studies, reference product batches with higher FPDs were utilized. In the second pivotal study, non-inferiority of Easyhaler compared to Turbuhaler was shown in safety and BE in efficacy for all other parameters except the formoterol AUCt. In the fourth study where two reference batches were compared to each other and Easyhaler, budesonide/formoterol Easyhaler was bioequivalent with one reference batch but not with the other having the highest FPDs amongst the 28 reference batches studied. In the IVIVC based study outcome predictions, the test product was bioequivalent with great proportion of the reference batches. For the test product and the median FPD reference product BE was predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Equivalence regarding both safety and efficacy between budesonide/formoterol Easyhaler and Symbicort Turbuhaler was shown based on totality of evidence from the PK studies and IVIVC analyses, and therefore, therapeutic equivalence between the products can be concluded. The results of the PK studies are likely dependent on the variability of FPDs of the reference product batches.

Equivalent lung deposition of budesonide in vivo: a comparison of dry powder inhalers using a pharmacokinetic method.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of budesonide administered from two dry powder inhalers, Giona Easyhaler 200 microg/dose and Pulmicort Turbuhaler 200 microg/dose by utilizing a pharmacokinetic method. METHODS: This was an open, randomized, crossover study in 33 healthy subjects. The study consisted of four treatment periods separated by at least 4 wash-out days. Equivalence in lung deposition was assessed after a single inhaled 1000 microg (5 x 200 microg) dose of budesonide from Giona Easyhaler and from Pulmicort Turbuhaler. Concomitant oral charcoal administration (40 g) was used to prevent gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of budesonide. The efficacy of the charcoal was studied after oral administration of a budesonide 2 mg capsule. The subjects were trained to inhale the study drugs with controlled flow rates, which resulted in an equal pressure drop (4 kPa) across both inhalers. Venous blood samples for the determination of budesonide concentrations in plasma were drawn before and at predetermined time points up to 8 h after drug administration. Budesonide concentrations in plasma were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Several pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, the area under the budesonide concentration in plasma vs time curve from dosing to infinity (AUC(0, infinity)) being the primary response variable. Equivalence in lung deposition was concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the Easyhaler : Turbuhaler ratio of AUC(0, infinity) fell within the limits of 0.8-1.25. RESULTS: The mean AUC(0,infinity) value after Easyhaler treatment was 3.48 (standard deviation (SD) 0.93) ng ml(-1) h and after Turbuhaler treatment 3.46 (1.13) ng ml(-1) h. The Easyhaler : Turbuhaler AUC(0, infinity) ratio was 1.02 and the 90% CI was from 0.96 to 1.09. The mean C(max) values (SD) for budesonide in plasma after Easyhaler and Turbuhaler treatments were 1.22 (0.41) ng ml(-1) and 1.29 (0.44) ng ml(-1), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.39) between the median t(max) for Easyhaler (30 min) and Turbuhaler treatment (23 min). Charcoal impaired the GI absorption of budesonide by 96%. The occurrence of adverse events was similar during both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the lung deposition of budesonide from Giona Easyhaler 200 microg/dose and Pulmicort Turbuhaler 200 microg/dose dry powder inhalers is equivalent. The charcoal block used to prevent GI absorption of swallowed budesonide was found to be effective.

Epidermal cell culture model derived from rat keratinocytes with permeability characteristics comparable to human cadaver skin.

The permeability characteristics of an organotypic epidermal culture model derived from rat epidermal keratinocytes, ROC, and isolated human cadaver epidermis, HEM, were compared. Rat epidermal keratinocyte (REK) cell line was grown for 3 weeks on collagen gel in the absence of feeder cells in culture inserts at an air-liquid interface. Transdermal permeabilities of 18 compounds ranging from 92 to 504 in molecular weight and from -4.3 to 3.9 in log of octanol-water partition coefficient, charged or uncharged, were measured in the culture model and isolated human epidermis. The REK organotypic culture model (ROC) provided a close estimate of human epidermal permeabilities over the whole range of the solutes used with on the average of 2-fold higher permeability coefficients (range 0.3-5.2) than those obtained from isolated human cadaver epidermis. The easily maintained and reproducible ROC model may be useful in screening transepidermal drug permeabilities together with possessing potential for research on dermal formulations, irritation, toxicity and gene therapy.