Evaluation of Academic Detailing to Impact Pharmacists' Compliance with an Outpatient Pharmacy Partial Fill Policy.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists' compliance with a medication partial fill policy at a Veterans Affairs healthcare system has been underwhelming. Academic detailing, an educational outreach approach conducted by trained health care professionals to improve patient care, is an attractive method for improving pharmacists' compliance with the policy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of academic detailing on pharmacists' compliance with the partial fill policy. METHODS: A pre-post analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of academic detailing outreach visits on pharmacists' compliance with the partial fill policy. Data collection included all partial fill medication orders verified during the study duration. Student's t-test was used to analyze the change in the day supply of partial fills following the academic detailing intervention. Total partial fill drug expense during the pre- and post-intervention phases was calculated as drug cost plus material cost for each partial fill. RESULTS: A total of 36 (97.3%) pharmacists received an academic detailing outreach visit. Total percentage of partial fills limited to a 7-day supply was significantly increased following academic detailing outreach visits (49.2% pre-intervention vs. 84.2% post-intervention, p-value <0.001). Total partial fill drug expense decreased from $12,144.42 to $9,713.50. Percentage of partial fills limited to a 7-day supply remained significant during the 6-month follow-up period (p-value = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Academic detailing is an effective method for improving pharmacists' compliance with an outpatient pharmacy partial fill policy and decreasing total partial fill drug expense for the pharmacy department.

Impact of a Shared Medical Appointment on Hypertension Clinical Outcomes and Medication Adherence in a Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Background:Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are utilized across health care systems to improve access and quality of care, with limited evidence to support the use of SMAs to improve clinical outcomes and medication adherence among hypertensive patients. Objective: Improve access and quality of care provided within a Veterans Affairs health care system via implementation of a hypertension SMA to improve clinical outcomes and medication adherence. Methods: Veterans were eligible for enrollment in the SMA if they received care within the health care system, were aged ≥18 years, were receiving at least 2 antihypertensive medications, and had systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg. A pre/post cohort design was used to evaluate the improvement in antihypertensive medication adherence as well as the change in SBP and DBP for all Veterans who attended at least 2 SMAs. Results: Twenty-one Veterans participated in at least 2 SMAs and were included in the analysis; 76.2% had a reduction in SBP with an overall average decrease of -8.3 mm Hg (P = .02). The proportion of Veterans considered to have controlled blood pressure (BP; <140/90 mm Hg) increased from 14.3% at baseline to 42.9% during the SMA period (P = .03). There was no significant difference found for the proportion of Veterans considered adherent to their prescribed antihypertensive medications (95.2% vs 85.7%, respectively; P = .50). Conclusions: SBP significantly improved for patients enrolled in a pharmacist-led SMA at a VA health care system, and the proportion of patients considered to have controlled BP increased significantly.

Antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among central Alabama veterans.

Medication nonadherence is associated with adverse outcomes. To evaluate antihypertensive medication adherence and its association with blood pressure (BP) control, the authors described population adherence to prescribed antihypertensive medication (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and BP control (mean BP <140/90 mm Hg) among central Alabama veterans during the fiscal year 2015. Overall, 75.1% of patients receiving antihypertensive medication were considered adherent, and 66.1% had adequate BP control. Patients adherent to antihypertensive medication were more likely to have adequate BP control compared with patients classified as nonadherent (67.4% vs 62.0%; adjusted odds ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.44 [P<.0001]). Among patients who had uncontrolled BP, 73.6% were considered adherent to medication. Adherence to antihypertensive medication was associated with adequate BP control; however, a substantial proportion of patients with inadequate BP control were also considered adherent. Interventions to increase BP control could address more aggressive medication management to achieve BP goals.