Adjusting Atrial Size Parameters for Body Surface Area: Does it Affect the Association With Pulmonary Embolism-related Adverse Events?

PURPOSE: Small left atrial (LA) volume was recently reported to be one of the best predictors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE)-related adverse events (AE). There is currently no data available regarding the impact that body surface area (BSA)-indexing of atrial measurements has on the association with PE-related adverse events. Our aim is to assess the impact of indexing atrial measurements to BSA on the association between computed tomography (CT) atrial measurements and AE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study (IRB: 2015P000425). A database of hospitalized patients with acute PE diagnosed on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between May 2007 and December 2014 was reviewed. Right and left atrial volume, largest axial area, and axial diameters were measured. Patients undergo both echocardiographies (from which the BSA was extracted) and CTPAs within 48 hours of the procedure. The patient's body weight was measured during each admission. LA measurements were correlated to AE (defined as the need for advanced therapy or PE-related mortality at 30 days) before and after indexing for BSA. The area under the ROC curve was calculated to determine the predictive value of the atrial measurements in predicting AE. RESULTS: The study included 490 acute PE patients; 62 (12.7%) had AE. There was a significant association of reduced BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume (both <0.001), area (<0.001 and 0.001, respectively), and short-axis diameters (both <0.001), and their respective RA/LA ratios (all <0.001) with AE. The AUC values were similar for BSA-indexed and non-indexed LA volume, diameters, and area with LA volume measurements being the best predictor of adverse outcomes (BSA-indexed AUC=0.68 and non-indexed AUC=0.66), followed by non-indexed LA short-axis diameter (indexed AUC=0.65, non-indexed AUC=0.64), and LA area (indexed AUC=0.64, non-indexed AUC=0.63). CONCLUSION: Adjusting for BSA does not substantially affect the predictive ability of atrial measurements on 30-day PE-related adverse events, and therefore, this adjustment is not necessary in clinical practice. While LA volume is the better predictor of AE, LA short-axis diameter has a similar predictive value and is more practical to perform clinically.

Intra- and interobserver variability of novel magnetic resonance imaging parameters for hip screening and treatment outcomes at age 5 years.

BACKGROUND: The outcome measure of neonatal hip screening is usually the radiographic acetabular index. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without sedation and compare the utility of outcome parameters measured from MRI images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The invitation for MRI scanning at 5 years of age was incorporated into follow-up for babies who had more than one ultrasound examination during treatment or surveillance. RESULTS: Diagnostic images were obtained in 132 of 134 children. The mean osseous acetabular index (standard deviation [SD]) was 16.6 (3.3) degrees for the right hip and 17.8 (3.2) for the left; the values for the cartilaginous acetabular index were 3.1 (3) and 3.4 (3.2). The mean downslope of a tangent to the lateral bony acetabular roof was 10.4 (4.5) and 9.0 (4.3) with respect to Hilgenreiner's line and that of a line drawn through the apex to the margin of the acetabulum was 3.7 (4.6) and 3.9 (4.7). Intra- and interobserver variation was greater for measures specific to the lateral acetabular roof than for ossific and cartilaginous indices. There was significant negative correlation between the downslope of the tangent to the lateral roof index and the age at onset of treatment on both sides, but no significant correlation for ossific or cartilaginous acetabular indices or apex-marginal index. CONCLUSION: MRI without sedation at 5 years of age is feasible as an outcome measure for hip screening programmes. Parameters specific to the lateral acetabulum may better reflect acetabular sufficiency, despite having greater observer variation than cartilaginous and ossific acetabular indices.

Evidence for Left Atrial Volume Being an Indicator of Adverse Events in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Retrospective Case-control Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) atrial measurements and both 30-day pulmonary embolism (PE)-related adverse events and mortality, and non-PE-related mortality, and to identify the best predictors of these outcomes by comparing atrial measurements and widely used clinical and imaging variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center pilot study. Acute PE patients diagnosed on CTPA who also had a transthoracic echocardiogram, electrocardiogram, and troponin T were included. CTPA left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) volume and short-axis diameter were measured and compared between outcome groups, along with right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio, interventricular septal bowing, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, electrocardiogram, and troponin T. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients. LA volume and diameter were associated with PE-related adverse events (P≤0.01). LA volume was the only atrial measurement associated with PE-related mortality (P=0.03), with no atrial measurements associated with non-PE-related mortality. Troponin was most associated with PE-related adverse events and mortality (both area under the curve [AUC]=0.77). On multivariate analysis, combination models did not greatly improve PE-related adverse events prediction compared with troponin alone. For PE-related mortality, the best models were the combination of troponin, age, and either LA volume (AUC=0.86) or diameter (AUC=0.87). CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute PE, CTPA LA volume is the only imaging parameter associated with PE-related mortality and is the best imaging predictor of this outcome. Reduced CTPA LA volume and diameter, along with increased RA/LA volume and diameter ratios, are significantly associated with 30-day PE-related adverse events, but not with non-PE-related mortality.

Quality and diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA): A comparison between pre-liver and pre-kidney transplant patients.

PURPOSE: Assess and compare the quality and diagnostic performance of CCTA between pre-liver and pre-kidney transplant patients, and gauge impact of CCTA on ICA requirements. METHODS: Patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) were selected for CCTA if considered high-risk or after abnormal stress testing. All pre-liver and pre-kidney CCTAs between March 2018 and August 2020 were retrospectively included. CCTA quality was qualitatively graded as excellent/good/fair/poor, and CAD graded as < or ≥50% stenosis. Heart rate, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and fractional flow reserve CT (FFRCT) results were collected. CAD stenosis was graded on invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) images, with ≥50% stenosis defined as significant. RESULTS: 162 pre-transplant patients (91 pre-liver, 71 pre-kidney). Pre-kidney patients had poorer CCTA quality (p = 0.04) and higher heart rate (median: 65 bpm vs 60 bpm, p < 0.001). Out of 147 diagnostic CCTAs (pre-liver: 84, pre-kidney: 63), 73 (49.7%) had a ≥50% stenosis (pre-liver: 38 (45.2%), pre-kidney:35 (55.6%)). 12/38 (31.6%) had a significantly reduced FFRCT, and 19/53 (35.8%) had ≥50% stenosis on ICA. Among patients whose CCTA was diagnostic and had ICA, stenosis severity was concordant in 10/23 (43.5%) pre-liver and 10/25 (40%) pre-kidney patients. All discordant cases had stenosis 'over-called' on CCTA. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic-quality CCTAs in high-risk pre-transplant patients are achievable and can greatly reduce ICA requirements by excluding significant CAD. CCTA quality is poorer in pre-kidney transplant patients compared to pre-liver, possibly due to higher heart rate.

Risk assessment of acute pulmonary embolism utilizing coronary artery calcifications in patients that have undergone CT pulmonary angiography and transthoracic echocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) on non-ECG-gated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with short-term mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We retrospectively included all in-patients between May 2007 and December 2014 with an ICD-9 code for acute PE and CTPA and transthoracic echocardiography available. CAC was qualitatively graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Relations of CAC with overall and PE-related 30-day mortality were assessed using logistic regression analyses. The independence of those relations was assessed using a nested approach, first adjusting for age and gender, then for RV strain, peak troponin T, and cardiovascular risk factors for an overall model. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine patients were included (63 ± 16 years, 52.8% women, 47.2% men). In total, 253 (52.8%) had CAC-mild: 143 (29.9%); moderate: 89 (18.6%); severe: 21 (4.4%). Overall mortality was 8.8% (n = 42) with higher mortality with any CAC (12.6% vs. 4.4% without; odds ratio [OR] 3.1 [95%CI 2.1-14.5]; p = 0.002). Mortality with severe (19.0%; OR 5.1 [95%CI 1.4-17.9]; p = 0.011), moderate (11.2%; OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.1-6.8]; p = 0.031), and mild CAC (12.6%; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.4-6.9]; p = 0.006) was higher than without. OR adjusted for age and gender was 2.7 (95%CI 1.0-7.1; p = 0.050) and 2.6 (95%CI 0.9-7.1; p = 0.069) for the overall model. PE-related mortality was 4.0% (n = 19) with higher mortality with any CAC (5.9% vs. 1.8% without; OR 3.5 [95%CI 1.1-10.7]; p = 0.028). PE-related mortality with severe CAC was 9.5% (OR 5.8 [95%CI 1.0-34.0]; p = 0.049), with moderate CAC 6.7% (OR 4.0 [95%CI 1.1-14.6]; p = 0.033), and with mild 4.9% (OR 2.9 [95%CI 0.8-9.9]; p = 0.099). OR adjusted for age and gender was 4.2 (95%CI 0.9-20.7; p = 0.074) and 3.4 (95%CI 0.7-17.4; p = 0.141) for the overall model. Patients with sub-massive PE showed similar results. CONCLUSION: CAC is frequent in acute PE patients and associated with short-term mortality. Visual assessment of CAC may serve as an easy, readily available tool for early risk stratification in those patients. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery calcification assessed on computed tomography pulmonary angiography is frequent in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. • Coronary artery calcification assessed on computed tomography pulmonary angiography is associated with 30-day overall and PE-related mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. • Coronary artery calcification assessed on computed tomography pulmonary angiography may serve as an additional, easy readily available tool for early risk stratification in those patients.

Imaging of Cardiac Infections: A Comprehensive Review and Investigation Flowchart for Diagnostic Workup.

Infections of the cardiovascular system may present with nonspecific symptoms, and it is common for patients to undergo multiple investigations to arrive at the diagnosis. Echocardiography is central to the diagnosis of endocarditis and pericarditis. However, cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging also play an additive role in these diagnoses; in fact, magnetic resonance imaging is central to the diagnosis of myocarditis. Functional imaging (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT and radiolabeled white blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography/CT) is useful in the diagnosis in prosthesis-related and disseminated infection. This pictorial review will detail the most commonly encountered cardiovascular bacterial and viral infections, including coronavirus disease-2019, in clinical practice and provide an evidence basis for the selection of each imaging modality in the investigation of native tissues and common prostheses.

Review of Chest Radiograph Findings of COVID-19 Pneumonia and Suggested Reporting Language.

The diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The utility of chest radiography (CXR) remains an evolving topic of discussion. Current reports of CXR findings related to COVID-19 contain varied terminology as well as various assessments of its sensitivity and specificity. This can lead to a misunderstanding of CXR reports and makes comparison between examinations and research studies challenging. With this need for consistency, we propose language for standardized CXR reporting and severity assessment of persons under investigation for having COVID-19, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, and patients who may have radiographic findings typical or suggestive of COVID-19 when the diagnosis is not suspected clinically. We recommend contacting the referring providers to discuss the likelihood of viral infection when typical or indeterminate features of COVID-19 pneumonia on CXR are present as an incidental finding. In addition, we summarize the currently available literature related to the use of CXR for COVID-19 and discuss the evolving techniques of obtaining CXR in COVID-19-positive patients. The recently published expert consensus statement on reporting chest computed tomography findings related to COVID-19, endorsed by the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA), the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR), and American College of Radiology (ACR), serves as the framework for our proposal.