Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 119(14): 2059-63, 1999 May 30.
Artigo em Norueguês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10394284

RESUMO

Manual therapy includes methods where the therapist's hands are used to stretch, mobilize or manipulate the spinal column, paravertebral structures or extremity joints. The aims of these methods are to relieve pain and improve function. In Norway only specially qualified physiotherapists and chiropractors are authorized to perform manipulation of joints (high velocity thrust techniques). To become a qualified manual therapist in Norway one must have a minimum of two years of clinical practice as physiotherapist followed by two year full time postgraduate training in manual therapy (a total of six years). Historically the Norwegian manual therapy system was developed in the 1950s by physiotherapists and medical doctors in England (James Cyriax and James Mennell) and Norway. As a result doctors allowed physiotherapists to use manipulation as a treatment method of both spinal and peripheral joints. In 1957 the Norwegian health authorities introduced reimbursement for manual therapy performed by physiotherapists.


Assuntos
Quiroprática , Manipulação Ortopédica , Manipulação da Coluna , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Quiroprática/educação , Quiroprática/história , Quiroprática/métodos , Educação Continuada , História do Século XX , Humanos , Manipulação Ortopédica/história , Manipulação Ortopédica/métodos , Manipulação da Coluna/história , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , Massagem , Noruega , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/história , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/métodos
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 22(14): 1610-6; discussion 1617, 1997 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9253097

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: The study was carried out as an open, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study with an observation period of 12 months. Four norwegian physiotherapy institutes took part. Patients were subsequently followed for 12 months of home exercise on their own, without for 12 months of home exercise on their own, without the supervision of a physiotherapist. OBJECTIVES: 1) To investigate and compare the effects of two different exercise programs on low back problems in patients after a 1-year training program under the supervision of a physiotherapist. 2) To investigate the effect supervision by, and motivation from, physiotherapists has on training compliance and efficacy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After ordinary physiotherapy treatment for low back problems, patients were randomly allocated either to a conventional training program designed by physiotherapists or to a training program using a new Norwegian-developed training apparatus called the TerapiMaster. The study included 153 patients with low back problems, all of whom had been referred to physiotherapy by their general practitioners. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed for an additional 12 months when performing home exercise programs on their own. METHODS: Monitoring patient satisfaction with the training program, compliance with the program, and absenteeism from work during the training period. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction with both training programs was high, with about 83% of participating patients completing the study in accordance with the protocol. Mean absenteeism (SD) during the preceding year totaled 82.5 days (19.8) in the conventional training group and 61.6 days (14.7) in the TerapiMaster group. Significant reductions to 17.2 days (6.0) and 16.4 days (5.3) in the two groups, respectively, were recorded during the training period, corresponding to a 75% to 80% reduction compared with the preceding 1-year period. Mean absenteeism showed a further significant decline during the 12-month period without supervised training. The average values were 9.9 days (3.2) for conventional training and 9.3 days (3.1) for the TerapiMaster, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both exercise programs reduced absenteeism significantly (75-80%). No difference in the effects of the two different programs was discernible. Regular follow-up through encouragement and variation in the training programs appear to be important factors for motivating patients to adhere to regular exercise programs for low back problems. This thesis was corroborated by the 12-month study of unsupervised exercise.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Licença Médica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...