Markers of Hereditary Thrombophilia with Unclear Significance.

Thrombophilia leads to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Widely accepted risk factors for thrombophilia comprise deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin, as well as the factor V "Leiden" mutation, the prothrombin G20210A mutation, dysfibrinogenemia, and, albeit less conclusive, increased levels of factor VIII. Besides these established markers of thrombophilia, risk factors of unclear significance have been described in the literature. These inherited risk factors include deficiencies or loss-of-activity of the activity of ADAMTS13, heparin cofactor II, plasminogen, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), thrombomodulin, protein Z (PZ), as well as PZ-dependent protease inhibitor. On the other hand, thrombophilia has been linked to the gain-of-activity, or elevated levels, of α2-antiplasmin, angiotensin-converting enzyme, coagulation factors IX (FIX) and XI (FXI), fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI). With respect to the molecular interactions that may influence the thrombotic risk, more complex mechanisms have been described for endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and factor XIII (FXIII) Val34Leu. With focus on the risk for venous thrombosis, the present review aims to give an overview on the current knowledge on the significance of the aforementioned markers for thrombophilia screening. According to the current knowledge, there appears to be weak evidence for a potential impact of EPCR, FIX, FXI, FXIII Val34Leu, fibrinogen, homocysteine, PAI-1, PZ, TAFI, and TFPI on the thrombotic risk.

Impact of double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin G20210A on the thrombotic phenotype.

INTRODUCTION: Because of the rarity of double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden (FVL) and Prothrombin (FII) G20210A, little is known about the thrombotic phenotype in double heterozygotes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of patients referred for a thrombophilia work-up, we investigated whether double heterozygotes (n = 138) exhibit a more severe thrombotic phenotype compared with single FVL or FIIG20210A heterozygotes, single FVL homozygotes, or wildtype carriers. RESULTS: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher for female but not male double heterozygotes compared with single heterozygotes (FVL: 2.51, 95%CI 1.55-4.08, FIIG20210A: 1.75, 95%CI 1.14-2.68) and wildtype carriers (HR 2.53, 95%CI 1.58-4.05) but not compared with FVL homozygotes (HR 1.31, 95%CI 0.94-1.83). Female double heterozygotes developed VTE nearly a decade earlier than wildtype carriers and FVL heterozygotes (mean 44.2 vs. 52.6 and 52.2 years), most often in association with oral contraceptives. Spontaneous VTE and arterial thromboembolic events were not more frequent in double heterozygotes compared with the other genotype groups. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb was the predominant VTE location in double heterozygotes, atypical vein thrombosis was rare. A phenomenon that has been described as the FVL paradox, a higher proportion of isolated DVT than pulmonary embolism, was also found for double heterozygotes. CONCLUSION: The thrombotic phenotype in double heterozygotes resembles the appearance of the thrombotic phenotype in FVL carriers but the thrombotic risk is aggravated by women-specific risk factors.