The application of adjuvant autologous antravesical macrophage cell therapy vs. BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: While adjuvant immunotherapy with Bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) is effective in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC), adverse events (AEs) are considerable. Monocyte-derived activated killer cells (MAK) are discussed as essential in antitumoural immunoresponse, but their application may imply risks. The present trial compared autologous intravesical macrophage cell therapy (BEXIDEM) to BCG in patients after transurethral resection (TURB) of BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label trial included 137 eligible patients with TaG1-3, T1G1-2 plurifocal or unifocal tumours and >or=2 occurrences within 24 months and was conducted from June 2004 to March 2007. Median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 12 months. Patients were randomized to BCG or mononuclear cells collected by apheresis after ex vivo cell processing and activation (BEXIDEM). Either arm treatment consisted of 6 weekly instillations and 2 cycles of 3 weekly instillations at months 3 and 6. Toxicity profile (primary endpoint) and prophylactic effects (secondary endpoint) were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were evenly distributed. Of 73 treated with BCG and 64 with BEXIDEM, 85% vs. 45% experienced AEs and 26% vs. 14% serious AEs (SAE), respectively (p<0.001). Recurrence occurred significantly less frequent with BCG than with BEXIDEM (12% vs. 38%; p<0.001). DISCUSSION: This initial report of autologous intravesical macrophage cell therapy in BC demonstrates BEXIDEM treatment to be safe. Recurrence rates were significantly lower with BCG however. As the efficacy of BEXIDEM remains uncertain, further data, e.g. marker lesions studies, are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered in the ISRCTN registry http://isrctn.org under the registration number ISRCTN35881130.

European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG): part II.

OBJECTIVES: The first consensus report that had been presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, The Netherlands. METHODS: Medical oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. RESULTS: The second part of the consensus paper includes the treatment of metastasised disease, residual tumour resection, salvage therapy, follow-up, and late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early-stage as well as of advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I.

OBJECTIVES: The first consensus report presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in the year 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS: Medical oncologists, urological surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference, and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting, the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. RESULTS: The first part of the consensus paper describes the clinical presentation of the primary tumor, its treatment, the importance and treatment of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN), histological classification, staging and prognostic factors, and treatment of stage I seminoma and non-seminoma. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

Administration of estramustine in response to changes in the prostate-specific antigen and Karnofsky index in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Androgen ablation is palliative and does not cure advanced prostate cancer. The hormone-sensitive cells die and the hormone-resistant cells overgrow, resulting in disease progression. The drug of choice for secondary treatment is estramustine (Estracyt). The success of the therapy is followed by changes of the prostate-specific antigen level and Karnofsky scale. In the present study, the results of estramustine treatment of 79 patients with advanced prostate cancer in 12 hospitals were evaluated. The mean prostate-specific antigen level improved for 6 months, but rose from the ninth month on. The improvement in the subjective condition of the patients paralleled the change in the prostate-specific antigen level. The short time of improvement was a consequence of the very high prostate-specific antigen level and the poor general condition. Estramustine administration is recommended when the prostate-specific antigen level becomes more than doubled following primary treatment. At a starting prostate-specific antigen level of > 100 ng/ml, the treatment leads to total androgen blockade. If the prostate-specific antigen level has not decreased after treatment for 3 months, the secondary strategy is to apply chemotherapy.

[The place of estramustine in the treatment of prostate cancer]. / Az estramustin helye a prostatarák kezelésében.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Prostate cancer is a dynamic disease. Androgen ablation is palliative, and does not cure advanced prostate cancer. The hormone-sensitive cells die, and the hormone-resistant cells come into excess; the disease then progresses, which results in a deterioration of the condition of the patient. The theoretical basis of the curing strategy is the fact that the prostate tumour itself changes during the progression; the molecular determinants of the resistance are present in the varying stages of the disease. The treatment of advanced prostate cancer remains unsolved; it is a well-known fact that a hormone-resistant state develops after the primary treatment forms (androgen withdrawal). The drug of choice for the secondary treatment is estramustine. This can be utilized as monotherapy or in combination. METHODS: In the present study, the results of estramustine treatment of 79 patients with advanced prostate cancer were evaluated. The preparation, known and clinically applied for more than 20 years, was studied in 12 centres. RESULTS: The mean prostate-specific antigen level improved for 6 months, but rose from the 9th month on. The improvement in the subjective condition of the patients paralleled the change in the prostate-specific antigen level. The shortness of the improvement was a consequence of the very high prostate-specific antigen level and the poor general condition. CONCLUSIONS: Estramustine administration is recommended when the prostate-specific antigen level becomes more than doubled following the primary treatment. At a starting prostate-specific antigen level of >100 ng/ml, the treatment leads to total androgen blockade. If the prostate-specific antigen level has not decreased after treatment for 3 months, the secondary strategy is to apply chemotherapy.

[Early diagnosis of testicular cancer] / A heredaganatok korai diagnózisa.

PURPOSE: The authors analyze their 3-year results of the "educational and early detection program for testicular cancer". The goals of the program are to reduce the duration of symptoms and to improve early detection. METHODS: Advertisements were placed in the media describing the early signs of testicular cancer, the risks factors, the correct method of self-investigation and the importance of early detection. Between 1 April, 1995 and 1 April, 1998 5056 volunteers were examined. They underwent physical and ultrasound examination of the testicles, and in case of suspicious findings, tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein, human choriogonadotropin) were checked. RESULTS: Testicular tumors were found in 1.28% of patients with symptoms (testicular enlargement or nodules). No tumor was found in the population that was symptom-free, or in patients with pain, sensitivity to palpation, or unrelated complaints. Of the patients with a palpable lump and swollen testicles, 4.5 and 3.9% were found to have tumors respectively. In total 32 testicular tumors were detected in 30 patients: 15 (2 bilateral) seminomas, 13 non-seminomas and 4 benign tumors. The occurrence of malignant testicular tumors was most frequent, 1.6% in the age group between 15 and 40 years. The stages were as follows: 9 I/A, 9 I/B, 1 I/S, 3 II/A, 1 II/B and 2 III/B. One patient was lost to follow-up after castration. All the other patients achieved complete remission. CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing incidence of testicular cancer screening of asymptomatic men does not lead to detection of tumors. The awareness of the early signs associated with cancer, self-examination, ultrasound examination of the testicle help in establishing an early diagnosis, nevertheless a widescale program for the early detection of testicular cancer is not justifiable. Effective early detection should be based on an educational program for the population at risk, the appropriate training of doctors and staff engaged in the health care of the young, and the initiation and facilitation of early ultrasound examination at the first symptoms. Serum markers play a limited role in early diagnosis.