Which meniscus injuries require surgery? / Hvilke meniskskader skal opereres?

Degenerative and traumatic meniscus injuries should be considered two completely different pathologies requiring treatment based on entirely different principles. Degenerative tears are part of the development of osteoarthritis and should generally be treated conservatively, whereas surgery should be considered for traumatic tears to help prevent the development of osteoarthritis. In this article, we summarise which patients should be referred promptly to an orthopaedic surgeon, and which should be referred to a physiotherapist.

Muscle Strength and Osteoarthritis Progression After Surgery or Exercise for Degenerative Meniscal Tears: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate muscle strength changes following partial meniscectomy or exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal tears and the relationship between baseline muscle strength and osteoarthritis progression. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial (n = 140 participants). Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength (peak torque [Nm/kg] and total work [J/kg]) were assessed at baseline, 3-month, 12-month, and 5-year follow-up. Between-group differences were analyzed using intent-to-treat linear mixed models. The relationship between baseline muscle strength and osteoarthritis progression (Kellgren/Lawrence ≥1 grade increase) were assessed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found statistically significant between-group differences favoring exercise therapy at 3 months (quadriceps -0.30 Nm/kg [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.40, -0.20]; hamstrings -0.10 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.15, -0.04]) and 12 months (quadriceps -0.13 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.23, -0.03]; hamstrings -0.08 Nm/kg [95% CI -0.14, -0.03]). At 5 years, between-group differences were -0.10 Nm/kg (95% CI -0.21, 0.01) for quadriceps and -0.07 Nm/kg (95% CI -0.13, -0.01) for hamstrings. Quadriceps muscle weakness at baseline was associated with knee osteoarthritis progression over 5 years, with adjusted odds ratio of 1.40 for every 0.2 Nm/kg decrease (95% CI 1.15, 1.71). The adjusted odds ratio for hamstrings was 1.14 (95% CI 0.97, 1.35) for every 0.1 Nm/kg decrease. CONCLUSION: Exercise therapy was effective in improving muscle strength at 3- and 12-month follow-up compared to partial meniscectomy, but the effect was attenuated at 5 years. Quadriceps muscle weakness at baseline was associated with higher odds of osteoarthritis progression over 5 years.

Lateral meniscal posterior root tears experience acceptable healing status after transtibial repair technique.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient MRI results, demography and clinical outcome following transtibial repair of lateral and medial meniscal posterior root tears. METHODS: Patients treated with transtibial repairs of posterior meniscal root tears from 2015 through 2018 performed pre- and postoperative MRI scans. Outcome measures were continuity/discontinuity of the meniscal root and change in meniscal extrusion on MRI. Other outcomes were KOOS, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale and the Global Rate of Change (GRoC) score for function and pain at follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-series. RESULTS: Of 41 patients, 36 attended follow-up at mean 26 (12-38) months postoperatively. At follow-up, 11 out of 18 lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) versus 5 out of 18 medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repairs were classified as healed. Meniscal extrusion decreased in LMPRTs from of 2.3 ± 1.5 mm to 1.4 ± 1.09 mm (p = 0.080) and increased in MMPRTs from 3.1 ± 1.6 mm to 4.8 ± 1.9 mm (p = 0.005) at FU (between-group difference, p < 0.001). LMPRT repairs were associated with ACL injury and additional meniscal injury and were younger and with lower BMI. No between-group differences were found for KOOS, Lysholm or GRoC Function scores. Tegner scale was higher and GRoC Pain score lower in the LMPRT group compared to the MMPRTs. CONCLUSION: Following transtibial repair for meniscal posterior root repairs, the LMPRTs had a higher frequency of healing, whereas most MMPRTs continued to extrude, despite surgical intervention. The study confirmed that LMPRTs and MMPRTs differ in demography and associated injuries.

On a Trajectory for Success-9 in Every 10 People With a Degenerative Meniscus Tear Have Improved Knee Function Within 2 Years After Treatment: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To identify trajectories of patient-reported knee function over 5 years in patients with degenerative meniscal tears, and to explore whether baseline characteristics were associated with trajectories of sport and recreational function. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a secondary exploratory analysis of the Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy Versus Exercise randomized controlled trial. Patient-reported knee function was assessed with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify subgroups of patients who followed distinctive patterns of change. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the associations of patient demographics, knee function, and disease-related factors with KOOS sport and recreational function subscale trajectories. RESULTS: The analysis of data from a sample of 140 participants identified 3 trajectories for all KOOS subscales: (1) low, minimal improvement (10%-12% of the participants), (2) moderate, gradual improvement (20%-36%), and (3) high, early improvement (53%-70%). Baseline prognostic factors for deteriorating function in sport and recreational activities were higher body mass index, poorer mental health, greater knee pain, lower perceived knee function, poorer quadriceps and hamstrings muscle strength, poorer functional performance, more meniscal extrusion, and radiographic signs of knee osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: We found 3 distinct trajectories of patient-reported knee function over 5 years: (1) low, minimal improvement, (2) moderate, gradual improvement, and (3) high, early improvement. Nine in every 10 participants improved at least gradually over 2 years after diagnosis of a degenerative meniscal tear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(6):289-297. Epub 10 May 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.10025.

Complex Tears, Extrusion, and Larger Excision Are Prognostic Factors for Worse Outcomes 1 and 2 Years After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Meniscal Tears: A Secondary Explorative Study of the Surgically Treated Group From the Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy Versus Exercise (OMEX) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined morphological findings from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic findings as prognostic factors for outcomes 1 and 2 years after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to evaluate prognostic factors of preoperative findings from MRI and arthroscopic evaluation on lower extremity performance at 1 year and patient-reported outcomes at 1 to 2 years after APM. The hypothesis was that medial compartment abnormalities would be prognostic for 1- and 2-year functional outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This secondary analysis from the OMEX (Odense-Oslo Meniscectomy Versus Exercise) trial included 40 patients treated surgically. Regression analyses with adjustments for age, sex, and body mass index explored associations between MRI findings (tear complexity and extrusion), arthroscopic findings (tear length, cartilage injury, and amount of excised meniscal tissue), and the following: lower extremity performance tests and thigh muscle strength at 1 year and the 5 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: A complex meniscal tear was a significant and clinically relevant prognostic factor for worse KOOS Symptoms subscores at 2 years (mean, 14.1 points [95% CI, 6.1-22.2]). Meniscal extrusion of at least 11%, 25%, and 20% were significant and clinically relevant prognostic factors for worse KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscores at 1 year and worse KOOS Sports and Recreation (Sports/Rec) subscores at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Tear lengths of at least 7.0 mm, 6.7 mm, and 6.5 mm were significant and clinically relevant prognostic factors for better KOOS Symptoms subscores at 1 year and better KOOS Sports/Rec subscores at 1 and 2 years, respectively. A cartilage injury in the medial compartment was a significant and clinically relevant prognostic factor for worse KOOS ADL and Quality of Life (QoL) subscores at 2 years (mean, 10.4 and 19.4 points, respectively [95% CI, 3.4-17.4 and 7.7-31.1, respectively]). More than 20% meniscal tissue excised was a significant and clinically relevant prognostic factor for worse KOOS Pain, Symptoms, ADL, and Sports/Rec subscores at 1 and 2 years (mean, 8.9-41.5 points [95% CI, 2.2-15.5 to 21.0-62.0]) and worse KOOS QoL subscores at 2 years (mean, 25.3 points [95% CI, 13.6-37.0]). CONCLUSION: Complex meniscal tears, larger extrusion, cartilage injuries, and larger meniscal excision were significant and clinically relevant prognostic factors for worse outcomes 1 and 2 years after APM. REGISTRATION: NCT01002794 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

The 6-m timed hop test is a prognostic factor for outcomes in patients with meniscal tears treated with exercise therapy or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a secondary, exploratory analysis of the Odense-Oslo meniscectomy versus exercise (OMEX) trial.

PURPOSE: To identify the prognostic factors for 2-year patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears treated with exercise therapy (ET) or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). METHODS: One hundred and seven patients, with mean age 49.6 (SD 6.2) years and BMI 25.7 (SD 3.7), were included in this analysis of data from the OMEX trial ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01002794). Linear and Poisson regression models were built to explore the associations between potential prognostic factors (patient characteristics, knee function-related and disease-related factors) and 2-year patient-reported outcomes: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Sport/Rec, QoL and 5-point Global Rating of Change scales for knee pain (GRC Pain) and function (GRC Function). Analyses were performed for the whole cohort and for the two treatment groups (n = 55 and 52) with adjustments for age, sex, BMI and baseline KOOS. RESULTS: For the whole cohort, a 1-s better baseline 6-m timed hop test result was associated with 3.1-7.1 points better 2-year scores for all KOOS subscales (95% CIs 1.1-5.2 to 4.1-10.1 points). A 1.61-2.80 s better test was associated with scores equivalent to previously calculated clinical relevant differences for each KOOS subscale. For the groups of patients treated with ET and APM, respectively, 2.09-3.60 s and 0.63-1.99 s better tests were associated with clinical relevant differences. For the whole cohort, a 1-s better test was associated with 26% (95% CI 15-38%) and 22% (95% CI 11-34%) higher possibility for better or much better GRC Pain and Function scores. Patients treated with ET had 17% (95% CI 2-33%) increased possibility for better or much better GRC Pain score, and patients treated with APM had 65% (95% CI 32-108%) and 70% (95% CI 38-109%) increased possibility for better or much better GRC Pain and Function scores. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-m timed hop test result was a significant prognostic factor for 2-year patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears, especially in those treated with APM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Middle-aged patients with an MRI-verified medial meniscal tear report symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis.

Background and purpose - No consensus exists on when to perform arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear. Since MRI and clinical tests are not accurate in detecting a symptomatic meniscal lesion, the patient's symptoms often play a large role when deciding when to perform surgery. We determined the prevalence and severity of self-reported knee symptoms in patients eligible for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy due to a degenerative meniscal tear. We investigated whether symptoms commonly considered to be related to meniscus injury were associated with early radiographic signs of knee osteoarthritis. Patients and methods - We included individual baseline items from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score collected in 2 randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment for an MRI-verified degenerative medial meniscal tears in 199 patients aged 35-65 years. Each item was scored as no, mild, moderate, severe, extreme, and at least "mild" considering the symptoms present. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis, defined as a Kellgren and Lawrence grade of at least 1, were seen in 70 patients. Results - At least monthly knee pain, pain during stair walking and when twisting on the knee, and lack of confidence in knee was present in at least 80% of the patients. Median severity was at least moderate for knee pain, pain when twisting on the knee, pain walking on stairs, lack of confidence in knee, and clicking. Mechanical symptoms such as catching were rare. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis were associated with an increased risk of self-reported swelling, catching, and stiffness later in the day; the odds ratio was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-4.9), 2.3 (1.2-4.3), and 2.3 (1.1-5.0), respectively. Interpretation - Middle-aged patients with a degenerative medial meniscus tear reported symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis. Frequent knee pain, presence of lack of confidence in the knee, and clicking did not distinguish those with a meniscal tear alone from those with early radiographic knee OA. Our findings support the notion that symptoms reported by those with a degenerative meniscal tear represent early signs of knee osteoarthritis.

Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE:  To determine if exercise therapy is superior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for knee function in middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears. DESIGN:  Randomised controlled superiority trial. SETTING:  Orthopaedic departments at two public hospitals and two physiotherapy clinics in Norway. PARTICIPANTS:  140 adults, mean age 49.5 years (range 35.7-59.9), with degenerative medial meniscal tear verified by magnetic resonance imaging. 96% had no definitive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. INTERVENTIONS:  12 week supervised exercise therapy alone or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:  Intention to treat analysis of between group difference in change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS4), defined a priori as the mean score for four of five KOOS subscale scores (pain, other symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and knee related quality of life) from baseline to two year follow-up and change in thigh muscle strength from baseline to three months. RESULTS:  No clinically relevant difference was found between the two groups in change in KOOS4 at two years (0.9 points, 95% confidence interval -4.3 to 6.1; P=0.72). At three months, muscle strength had improved in the exercise group (P≤0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in either group during the two year follow-up. 19% of the participants allocated to exercise therapy crossed over to surgery during the two year follow-up, with no additional benefit. CONCLUSION:  The observed difference in treatment effect was minute after two years of follow-up, and the trial's inferential uncertainty was sufficiently small to exclude clinically relevant differences. Exercise therapy showed positive effects over surgery in improving thigh muscle strength, at least in the short term. Our results should encourage clinicians and middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear and no definitive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis to consider supervised exercise therapy as a treatment option.Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01002794).

Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if exercise therapy is superior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for knee function in middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears. DESIGN: Randomised controlled superiority trial. SETTING: Orthopaedic departments at two public hospitals and two physiotherapy clinics in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 140 adults, mean age 49.5 years (range 35.7-59.9), with degenerative medial meniscal tear verified by magnetic resonance imaging. 96% had no definitive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. INTERVENTIONS: 12 week supervised exercise therapy alone or arthroscopic partial meniscectomy alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intention to treat analysis of between group difference in change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS4), defined a priori as the mean score for four of five KOOS subscale scores (pain, other symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and knee related quality of life) from baseline to two year follow-up and change in thigh muscle strength from baseline to three months. RESULTS: No clinically relevant difference was found between the two groups in change in KOOS4 at two years (0.9 points, 95% confidence interval -4.3 to 6.1; P=0.72). At three months, muscle strength had improved in the exercise group (P≤0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in either group during the two year follow-up. 19% of the participants allocated to exercise therapy crossed over to surgery during the two year follow-up, with no additional benefit. CONCLUSION: The observed difference in treatment effect was minute after two years of follow-up, and the trial's inferential uncertainty was sufficiently small to exclude clinically relevant differences. Exercise therapy showed positive effects over surgery in improving thigh muscle strength, at least in the short term. Our results should encourage clinicians and middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear and no definitive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis to consider supervised exercise therapy as a treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01002794).

All-inside suture device is superior to meniscal arrows in meniscal repair: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Multiple techniques and implants are available for all-inside meniscal repair, but the knowledge about their failure rates and functional outcome is still incomplete. The hypothesis was that there might be differences between meniscal arrows and suture devices regarding reoperation rates and functional outcome. Thereby, the aim of this study was to compare clinical results following repair with the Biofix(®) arrows or the FasT-Fix(®) suture devices. METHODS: In this RCT, 46 patients were treated either by Biofix(®) (n = 21) or FasT-Fix(®) (n = 25). The main outcome was reoperation within 2 years. Knee function and activity level were evaluated by KOOS and Tegner activity scale. RESULTS: Twelve out of 46 (26%) patients were reoperated within 2 years, nine out of 21 (43%) in the Biofix(®)-group versus three out of 25 (12%) in the FasT-Fix(®)-group (p = 0.018). The relative risk of reoperation was 3.6 times higher for Biofix(®) compared to FasT-Fix(®) (95% confidence interval 1.1-11.5). Both treatment groups had significant increase in all KOOS subscales, but there were no major differences between the groups. The subgroup of reoperated patients differed from the other patients with higher Tegner score preoperatively (median 5 vs. 4) (p = 0.037) and at 3-month follow-up (median 4 vs. 3) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that FasT-Fix(®) suture is superior to Biofix(®) arrows with significant lower failure rate. Functional outcome did not depend on repair technique. Higher activity score preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up in the reoperated patients indicates that activity level may influence on the risk of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.