Downhill Varices and Apical Lung Cancer Without Superior Vena Cava Syndrome.

A 75-year-old woman with hypertension, dyslipidemia, thalassemia trait, osteoarthritis of the knees, and hyperthyroidism presented with bloating, abdominal discomfort, and change in stool caliber underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed varices at the middle of esophagus, which were diagnosed to be downhill esophageal varices (DEVs). DEVs occur mainly from the superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction; however, in the absence of obstruction, angiogenesis and thrombosis could be the etiology. In our patient, computed tomography showed a pulmonary nodule located at periphery of the right upper lung without SVC contact nor obstruction. The nodule was later proven to be an adenocarcinoma. Thus, our patient showed the possibility that adenocarcinoma of the lung might associated with the DEV through a mechanism other than SVC obstruction. Recognition and differentiation of DEV from other benign venous blebs of the esophagus are important, and once detected, further investigation with computed tomography of the chest is recommended.

Regional Differences in Admissions and Treatment Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest cancers in Thailand. We report the stage and survival of patients who were admitted under the public universal health fund (NHSO) covering 47 million people to determine if there were regional disparities in the treatment outcomes in the country. METHOD: We used the 2009-2013 Nationwide Hospital Admission Data, Thailand. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were identified by the ICD10 code C22.0. Procedures were identified by ICD9-CM codes, and deaths were confirmed from the NHSO database and the national citizen registry. Thailand is divided into 6 regions and Bangkok. Hospitals were identified according to their specific reimbursement codes. Survival time started from the day of first admission and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The statistical method used to compare regions was Chi-squared tests (Pearson, likelihood ratio, linear-by linear association and Mantel-cox). RESULTS: There were 36,956 HCC patients admitted during the study period. The overall median survival was 36 days. 1.63% of the patients had surgery, 0.96% had radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 5.24% had trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). 90.24% did not have any tumor-specific therapy. The proportion of patients admitted for tumor-specific therapy vs. no tumor-specific therapy was significantly different between regions in all treatment modalities (p<0.01). Each treatment modality showed a wide range of median survival values across the regions (p<0.01). The best survival was seen in Bangkok, the South and the North (for surgery, RFA and TACE) and was often more than twice as long as the regions with the lowest survival, Central, East and West. CONCLUSIONS: There was a large previously-unreported disparity in admissions and outcomes in Thailand for different treatment modalities for HCC. Bangkok and the South had the best treatment outcomes and often had median survivals more than twice as long as those in the West and East. Public policy to reduce this disparity will need to be implemented in the future.

Comparison between using hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk scores and the HCC national guideline to identify high-risk chronic hepatitis B patients for HCC surveillance in Thailand.

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients is currently based on age/sex/cirrhosis, uses ultrasound abdomen every 6-12 months, and is a resource burden. HCC risk scores have been developed to classify HCC risk for surveillance. The number of HBV patients needing surveillance when HCC risk scores are used may be different from the current recommendation with implications on the resources needed for HCC surveillance. Methods: HBV patients from the liver clinic were included and classified as non-cirrhotic/cirrhotic and untreated/treated for analysis. Each subgroup was analyzed using REACH-B, CU-HCC, LSM-HCC, GAG-HCC, and mPAGE-B risk scores as appropriate. The change in the number of patients needing HCC surveillance using the above risk scores was calculated. Results: Seven-hundred and thirteen HBV patients were included, of whom 361 (50.6%) were male with mean age 55.43 years, and 76 (10.7%) had cirrhosis. In the untreated, non-cirrhotic subgroup, the percentage change of patients needing HCC surveillance was -69.5, -58.9, -58.8, and -54.1% when GAG-HCC, LSM-HCC, CU-HCC, and REACH-B were used compared to traditional criteria, respectively. In the treated, non-cirrhotic subgroup, the percentage change of patients needing HCC surveillance decreased by -80, -75.2, -75.2, and -2.8% when GAG-HCC, CU-HCC, REACH-B, and mPAGE-B were used, respectively. For the cirrhotic group, HCC risk scores did not make much difference. Conclusion: The use of HCC risk scores in non-cirrhotic HBV patients reduced the number of patients needing surveillance greatly. HBV cirrhotic patients should have HCC surveillance without the need for risk score calculation. Patients with a family history of HCC should undergo surveillance until proven unnecessary in prospective trials.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of infliximab and its biosimilar in patients with refractory moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease using real world evidence in Thailand.

AIMS: This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of infliximab and its biosimilar compared to conventional therapy in refractory moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate lifetime costs and health benefits of infliximab from a societal perspective. Our analyses consisted of three choices of treatment (conventional therapy, infliximab originator, and biosimilar) and three treatment scenarios (infliximab 2 years and 3 years if relapse, infliximab 2 years and lifelong if relapse, and infliximab lifelong). The input parameters were obtained from the CD registry and systematic literature reviews. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2017 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty. Threshold sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the optimal drug prices. Finally, budget impact analyses were conducted. RESULTS: None of the scenarios was cost-effective at Thai willingness-to-pay threshold (4,706 USD/QALY gained). The lowest ICER of 30,121 USD/QALY gained was reported in the scenario that included only standard dose of infliximab biosimilar with the maximum of 5-year treatment. The drug prices need to be reduced by at least 72% to allow infliximab biosimilar to be cost-effective. The 5-year budget impact was only 695,958 USD for the current biosimilar price. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab for the treatment of refractory moderate-to-severe CD in Thailand would be cost-effective if the drug prices were significantly decreased. The best value for money strategy was infliximab biosimilar with a restricted duration of treatment. Key points The use of infliximab and its biosimilar in a restricted duration of maximum 5-year is not cost-effective for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease refractory to conventional therapy, unless their price was lowered around 72-90% in Thailand. The estimated budget impact for adopting infliximab or its biosimilar for such indication has potential financial feasibility. Policy makers may consider cost-effectiveness and budget impact findings as well as other aspects such as rarity of disease as a part of the decision making process.

The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from patients' breath using canine scent detection: a proof-of-concept study.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes as a result of late detection of the disease. We investigated the possibility of using smell detection by dogs for detecting HCC from the breath of patients. Patients whose diagnosis of HCC was confirmed histologically or radiologically according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria had breaths collected using face masks and transported to the study test site. The numbering of the HCC samples was sent in a sealed envelope to blind the dog trainer during testing but allow for correct rewarding of the dog afterwards. One golden retriever was trained to detect HCC with positive feedback using known samples of HCC and healthy controls in a step-wise manner. The controls were selected from hospital staff and relatives of patients who were not involved in the study. They were questioned about the risks of their disease before selection. When the trainer was confident that the dog could recognize the HCC scent, blind testing was performed using 1 HCC : 3 healthy controls per test run. Once the dog signaled on a specimen, it was given a reward. The correct-detection rate was compared to the theoretical detection rate expected based on chance of 25% using the statistical one-sample test of proportions. Thirty-seven HCC patients were tested. The patients had a mean age of 58 years and 21/37 were male. Seventeen patients had hepatitis B and 14 patients had hepatitis C. Twenty-six patients had one HCC lesion; four patients had two lesions in the liver, whilst seven had many lesions. The number of patients in the very early, early, intermediate, advanced, and terminal stages of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification was 5, 9, 21, 1, and 1, respectively. The dog detected correctly in 29 runs. The sensitivity for canine detection was 78% (95% CI: 62%-90%). Compared to the 25% correct indication expected based on chance, this was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to look at the possibility of detecting HCC from breath using canine olfaction. Our results show that this is possible with an accuracy of 78% (p < 0.001 when compared to chance alone), and are thus a proof of concept. Further refinement of the process of detection will be needed before clinical application.

Ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma of at-risk patients in Ramathibodi Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended for patients at risk of developing HCC. However the pattern of surveillance in clinical practice is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the adherence of surveillance program in the detection of HCC and to determine the prevalence of HCC in the at-risk patients who were on surveillance in Ramathibodi Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective descriptive study of at-risk patients, who were followed in the liver clinic at Ramathibodi Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records and radiologic data were extractedfrom the radiology database (PACS). The US findings of focal liver lesion were analyzed for number size, location, and echogenicity. When focal liver lesions suggestive of HCC were detected on ultrasonography, dynamic contrast enhanced CT or AMRI was used to diagnose HCC. On CT/MRI, focal lesions were considered to be HCC when hypervascularity in the arterial phase and washout in the portal venous or delayed phase was found RESULTS: Nine hundred seven patients with risk(s) for HCC underwent ultrasound surveillance. The mean number of ultrasound examinations per patient was 4.7±2.2 scans during the course offollow-up. The mean total adherence time was 37.0±17.1 months. The median time interval between each ultrasound examination was 8.4 months (range: 1.1-63.0 months). Focal liver lesions were detected in 161 of 907patients (17.8%). No new focal liver lesion was detected at less than 3-month interval. The majority of patients were evaluatedfurther by MRI (n = 99; 62.3%) or by CT scan (n = 33; 20.8%). Theperiod prevalence of HCC in patients who received US surveillance was 3.5% (32 patients in 907patients). Most ofpatients with HCC were male (71.9%) and the major risk factor was chronic hepatitis B (50.0%). Twenty-one of 32 patients (65.6%) had normal serum AFP levels. Most HCC's (75.0%) were detected at 8-month interval. The cumulative percentage of HCC's detected at 6-month and 12-month surveillance intervals were 11.1% and 70.4%, respectively. The median tumor size was 22.5 mm, ranging from 12-134 mm. At the time ofHCC diagnosis, eight patients (25.0%) had HCC within BCLC very early stage (by size criteria) and 19 patients (59.4%) were in BCLC early stage. CONCLUSION: Although there were irregular surveillance intervals in our clinical practice, the overall adherence ofpatients to surveillance was acceptable, with the period prevalence of HCC 3.5% and the majority discovered in the early stage.

Risk for colorectal neoplasia in patients with colonic Crohn's disease and concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with ulcerative colitis and concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have a greater risk of developing colorectal dysplasia or invasive cancer than patients with only ulcerative colitis. Therefore, annual surveillance colonoscopies are recommended. We investigated whether primary sclerosing cholangitis is also a risk factor for colorectal dysplasia or cancer in patients with Crohn's disease of the colon. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of data from a tertiary care hospital on 166 patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease; 120 had concomitant ulcerative colitis, 35 had Crohn's disease, and 11 had indeterminate colitis. The controls comprised 114 patients with colonic involvement of Crohn's disease and 102 patients with ulcerative colitis. The main outcome parameter was the development of colorectal cancer or intraepithelial neoplasia. RESULTS: Only 1 patient with colonic Crohn's disease and concomitant PSC developed dysplasia in an adenomatous polyp during a median follow-up of 10 years (range, 7-16 years). In contrast, 2 cancers and 8 cases of colorectal dysplasia were diagnosed in patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC during a median follow up of 11 years (range, 8-16 years); the crude annual incidence of dysplasia or colorectal cancer was 1 in 150 patients with ulcerative colitis. Among patients with colonic Crohn's disease without PSC, 2 developed colorectal cancer during follow-up. The presence of PSC did not increase the risk of developing colorectal dysplasia in patients with Crohn's disease (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: PSC does not seem to increase the risk for dysplasia of the colon in patients with colonic Crohn's disease.

The role of liquid simethicone in enhancing endoscopic visibility prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Simethicone improves endoscopic visibility and diagnostic accuracy during colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy. Nevertheless, there have been limited data on its usefulness in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of simethicone on enhancing endoscopic visibility in patients undergoing EGD. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 121 patients were randomized to take 2 ml ofeither liquid simethicone or placebo in 60 ml of water at 15-30 minutes before EGD. The severity scores of foam and bubbles at the esophagus, stomach and duodenum were compared. RESULTS: Simethicone improved endoscopic visibility by diminishing mean cumulative (6.83 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.05 +/- 2.6, p < 0.001) and local scores offoam and bubbles at all areas, and decreased the number and timing ofadjunctive simethicone washing (17.5% vs. 74.1%, p < 0.001 and 0 vs. 19 seconds, p < 0.001). Simethicone increased endoscopist and patient satisfaction significantly without having adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Using simethicone before EGD enhances endoscopic visibility, reduces adjunctive simethicone washing and increases endoscopist and patient satisfaction.

Non-small-bowel lesions detected by capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Approximately two thirds of patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding will have an abnormality found in the small intestine. This report describes 9 patients (4 men, 5 women) of 140 with obscure bleeding in whom a source of their blood loss was found in the stomach or the colon at capsule endoscopy. METHODS: A review was made of a prospective database of 140 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding at a single center. Patients with a definite or likely cause of bleeding within reach of conventional upper or lower GI endoscopy were identified. RESULTS: Three patients had gastric antral vascular ectasia and another an inflamed pyloric canal polyp. Two patients had actively bleeding cecal carcinoma, missed at previous colonoscopies. Two others had bleeding cecal angiodysplasia. The final patient had severe nonspecific cecal inflammation. The identification of these lesions was aided by the suspected blood indicator. All patients underwent endoscopic therapy or surgery for their non-small-bowel lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Like push enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy also can identify lesions within reach of conventional endoscopy and colonoscopy. These subsequently can be treated successfully. The reasons why these lesions have been missed are unclear.