Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable high-grade osteosarcoma.

Radical surgery is not feasible for all osteosarcoma patients. Overall survival for non-extremity osteosarcoma, as well as for patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis remains poor. For such patients, radical radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy may present an effective treatment approach. This report describes the results of conservative treatment for osteosarcoma patients not suitable for surgery. Seven out of 71 consecutive osteosarcoma patients were treated non-surgically at the Helsinki University Central Hospital either due to the inoperability of the tumour or the patient's choice of therapy. Staging procedures and measurement of tumour size were performed using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Six patients were treated with chemo-radiotherapy, and one patient received radiotherapy alone. Five patients received computer-assisted dose-planned radiotherapy with curative intent (total dose 60-70.5 Gray), and two patients received radiotherapy as palliation. Radiotherapy relieved symptoms efficiently. Median time to local failure was 2.6 years (range 0.5-16.9+ years). Five year after treatment termination four patients were alive, and one of them remained disease-free. For selected patients not suitable for surgery, radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy provides an option to reduce symptoms caused by the primary tumour and improve quality of life. For some patients, this approach may (even) produce long-term remission.

Osteosarcoma in Finland from 1971 through 1990: a nationwide study of epidemiology and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have only been a few nationwide studies on the epidemiology and outcome of osteosarcoma. We report the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of osteosarcoma in Finland for the period 1971-1990. METHODS: The study material was derived from population-based data from the national Finnish Cancer Registry. 302 osteosarcomas were reported during the study period. Histological slides could be retrieved for 199 cases and from histological re-examination, 139 (83%) of these cases were confirmed as osteosarcoma and were included in the analysis. The mean length of follow-up was 8 (0.1-28) years. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival for the whole study population was 58%, with an improvement in survival during 1981-1990 (65%) compared to the period 1971-1980 (47%) (p=0.01). More chemotherapy was administered in the later time period. For metastasis-free survival, diagnosis in the 1970s as opposed to the 1980s (p=0.01) and large tumor size worsened outcome in univariate analysis. Patients who developed metastatic relapse within 10 months of the diagnosis had worse sarcoma-specific survival than those who developed metastases later. Limb-salvage surgery increased from 12% to 23% for patients with a peripheral tumor, with no increase in local relapses. INTERPRETATION: We recommend aggressive approach to treat recurrent disease, with a view to further improving survival. In a small country such as Finland it is necessary to concentrate treatment to only a few centers, to ensure a high quality of treatment.

Cement is recommended in intralesional surgery of giant cell tumors: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study of 294 patients followed for a median time of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumors of bone rarely metastasize but often recur locally after surgery. There is limited knowledge about the risk of recurrence related to different types of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed factors affecting the local recurrence rate in 294 patients with giant cell tumors of the extremities using prospectively collected material from 13 centers. The median follow-up time was 5 (0.2-18) years. RESULTS: A local recurrence was diagnosed in 57 of 294 patients (19%). The overall 5-year local recurrence rate was 0.22. Univariate analysis identified young age and intralesional surgery to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Based on multivariate analysis, the relative risk was 2.4-fold for intralesional surgery compared to more extensive operative methods. There was no correlation between tumor size, tumor extension, sex of the patient, tumor location, or fracture at diagnosis and outcome. In the subgroup of 200 patients treated with intralesional surgery, the method of filling (cement or bone) was known for 194 patients and was statistically highly significant in favor of the use of cement. INTERPRETATION: Intralesional surgery should be the first choice in most giant cell tumors, even in the presence of a pathological fracture. After thorough evacuation, the cavity should be filled with cement.