RESUMO
The correlation between serum ionized calcium, serum total calcium and albumin corrected total calcium was investigated in a prospective multicentre investigation of 1,213 patients with suspected calcium metabolic disease. 31.0% of the patients were misclassified when serum total calcium was measured instead of serum ionized calcium. The diagnostic discrepancy between the two methods decreased with the calculation of albumin corrected total calcium or calculated ionized calcium (17.9%). On justing for the analytical error connected with the measurement of ionized calcium, 11.2% of the patients were still misclassified. It is not possible precisely to predict serum ionized calcium from the measurement of serum total calcium and we recommend measurement of serum ionized calcium in patients believed to have calcium metabolic disease.
Assuntos
Distúrbios do Metabolismo do Cálcio/sangue , Cálcio/sangue , Dinamarca , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Albumina Sérica/análiseRESUMO
The correlations between serum ionized calcium, serum total calcium, total calcium corrected for albumin and calculated ionized calcium were investigated in a prospective multicentre investigation of 1213 patients suspected of having calcium metabolic disease. Diagnostic discordance between serum total calcium and measured ionized calcium was found in 31% of the patients. With the calculation of albumin-corrected total calcium or calculated ionized calcium the discordance decreased to 17.9%. The diagnostic discordance which could be ascribed to the analytical imprecision (CV = 1.5%) amounted to only 6.7%. Although we found highly significant correlations between the parameters, a considerable scatter around the regression line made prediction of ionized calcium from albumin-corrected total calcium unreliable in many patients.
