Difference in signalling between various hormone therapies in endometrium, myometrium and upper part of the vagina.

BACKGROUND: Combined hormone treatments in post-menopausal women have different clinical responses on uterus and vagina; therefore, we investigated differences in steroid signalling between various hormone therapies in these tissues. METHODS: A total of 30 post-menopausal women scheduled for hysterectomy were distributed into four subgroups: control-group (n = 9), Tibolone-group (n = 8); estradiol (E(2))-group (n = 7); E(2) + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)-group (n = 6). Medication was administered orally every day for 21 days prior to removal of uterus and upper part of the vagina. Tissue RNA was isolated, and gene expression profiles were generated using GeneChip technology and analysed by cluster analysis and significance analysis of microarrays. Apoptosis and cell proliferation assays, as well as immunohistochemistry for hormone receptors were performed. RESULTS: 21-days of treatment with E(2), E(2) + MPA or tibolone imposes clear differential gene expression profiles on endometrium and myometrium. Treatment with E(2) only results in the most pronounced effect on gene expression (up to 1493 genes differentially expressed), proliferation and apoptosis. Tibolone, potentially metabolized to both estrogenic and progestagenic metabolites, shows some resemblance to E(2) signalling in the endometrium and, in contrast, shows significant resemblance to E(2) + MPA signalling in the myometrium. In the vagina the situation is entirely different; all three hormonal treatments result in regulation of a small number (4-73) of genes, in comparison to signalling in endometrium and myometrium. CONCLUSION: Endometrium and myometrium differentially respond to the hormone therapies and use completely different sets of genes to regulate similar biological processes, while in this experiment the upper part of the vagina is hardly hormone responsive.

Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of postmenopausal endometrium after 3 weeks of treatment with tibolone, estrogen only, or estrogen plus progestagen.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate histological and immunohistochemical parameters of short-term (21 days) tibolone, estrogen-only, and estrogen+progestagen treatment in the human postmenopausal endometrium. DESIGN: An observational, open, nonrandomized, controlled study. SETTING: Three collaborating centers: Amphia Hospital in Breda, Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Dordrecht, Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Thirty healthy, postmenopausal women. INTERVENTION(S): Control group (n = 9), no hormonal treatment; tibolone group (n = 8), patients were treated with 2.5 mg of tibolone (administered orally) every day, starting 21 days before surgery; estrogen group (n = 7), patients were treated with 2 mg of E(2) (Zumenon, administered orally; Zambon, Amerfoort; The Netherlands) every day, starting 21 days before surgery; estrogen+progestagen group (n = 6), patients were treated with 2 mg of E(2) (Zumenon, administered orally) and 5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (administered orally) every day, starting 21 days before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Uterine tissues were collected, and two pathologists independently assessed histology. Immunohistochemical parameters measured were estrogen receptor alpha, progesterone receptor A/B, Hoxa10, Ki67, and Bcl-2. RESULT(S): On the basis of a number of histological and immunohistochemical parameters measured after 21 days of treatment, it was observed that tibolone displays clearly less stimulation (proliferation) of the human postmenopausal endometrium than estrogen at the beginning of a treatment, but the stimulation is higher than with estrogen+progestagen. CONCLUSION(S): Short-term (21 days) tibolone treatment results in a small stimulation of proliferation of the endometrium, and because long-term treatment with tibolone has been demonstrated to lead to an atrophic endometrium, it may be concluded that the stimulatory effect, as observed in this study, is transient in nature. It is hypothesized that tibolone first displays a more estrogenic mode of action, which over time, is counterbalanced by the induction of its progestagenic properties.