Extracorporeal photopheresis as an antirejection prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: preliminary results.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered a promising immunomodulatory therapy of acute allograft rejection in organ transplantation and graft-versus-host disease. Our aim was to investigate the biological responses of 10 patients who underwent kidney transplantation with ECP as prophylactic treatment. They received conventional immunosuppressive therapy plus ECP immediately after transplantation: 12 to 16 applications over the course of 2.5 months. ECP procedures were performed using an automated system for leukocyte separation and photoactivation with methoxsalen. All recipients were followed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and peripheral T, B, natural killer, T-regulatory (Treg) and dendritic cells (DC) counts and phenotypes. An acute rejection episode appeared in one control group recipient. The ECP group showed a positive trend to an higher GFR at months 3 (53±11 vs 47.1±9; P=.17) and 6 (67.5±10 vs 53.6±3; P=.03, Wilcoxon test). An increased percentage of Treg (CD3+ CD4+ CD25+) among the total CD3 cell count (4.9%±1% to 9.4%±15%) as well as inducible Treg (CD3+ CD8+ CD28-) was observed among CD3 cells (3.3%±3% to 11.8%±8%, P=.025) within 3 months of ECP treatment. A significant difference in the percentage of Treg was noted at month 3 (completed ECP) between the ECP and the control groups (9.4%±15% vs 3%±1%; P=.01). Addition of ECP to standard immunosuppression was associated with a significantly higher GFR at 6 months and with a significant increase in natural Treg among CD3 cells.

Application of extracorporeal photopheresis in kidney transplant recipients: technical considerations and procedure tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered to be a promising immunomodulatory therapy in diseases caused by aberrant T lymphocytes. ECP has been used in patients with graft-versus-host disease and systemic scleroderma as well as in solid organ rejection. Herein we report our experience with 148 ECP procedures performed in 10 kidney transplant recipients (12-19 sessions per patient). In 2 subjects, ECP was introduced because of a steroid-resistant rejection episode, and in 8 as supportive treatment in addition to standard immunosuppression in the first 3 months after transplantation. ECP procedures were performed using the UVAR XTS device (Therakos, Exton, PA), an automated closed system for white blood cell separation and photoactivation (ultraviolet light A) with methoxsalen. RESULTS: Vascular access was arteriovenous fistula (n=99), permanent catheter (n=16), peripheral vein (n=25), or polytetrafluoroethylene graft (n=8). Mean blood flow rate was 35.5±5 mL/min. Single ECP procedures lasted 175.5±35 min (range, 120-277), including photoactivation (33.3±30 min). Treatment volume (buffy coat) was 228.4±34 mL per session. Total fluids administered per session were 449.5±60 mL, and mean heparin dose was 5,979±530 IU. ECP-related side effects were transient hypotonia (n=2), increased body temperature (up to 37.5°C; n=4) and red blood cell loss due to a clotted kit or a technical problem with reinfusion (∼100 mL; n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular access for ECP was established in all transplant recipients, using even peripheral veins. Side effects associated with ECP were fairly tolerable by kidney allograft recipients. Caution must be paid to patients with fluid restriction (∼450 mL saline infusion) or the risk of bleeding due to anticoagulation.

The abnormal superficial radial artery does not restrict the successful creation of hemodialysis forearm arteriovenous fistula.

Anatomical variations of the radial artery are of clinical importance in end-stage renal disease patients awaiting creation of native arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. As radial-cephalic direct wrist fistula is a vascular access of choice, atypical localization of the distal part of the radial artery may lead to the false assumption of severe atherosclerotic lesions and prevent creation of such an access, despite good vessel conditions and convenient surgical approach. We present 7 patients with radial artery variations. In 5 patients with superficial radial artery, radial-cephalic direct wrist access was created. One patient, due to an anomaly misdiagnosis, had radial-cephalic fistula created on the contra lateral wrist. In the patient with hypoplastic radial artery brachial-basilic upper arm transposition was created.