Day-night differences in steady-state theophylline pharmacokinetics in asthmatic children.

Potential day-night differences of theophylline absorption and disposition were examined in day-active asthmatic children. Theophylline was given orally as TheoDur tablets and Somophyllin-CRT capsules (random crossover) every 12 hr (0700 and 1900), and patients were studied during two consecutive dosing intervals. In addition, patients were studied during the last 24 hr of a 48-hr continuous, intravenous aminophylline infusion. Serum theophylline concentrations were essentially constant during the intravenous infusion for the day and night periods. Thus, day and night clearances were nearly identical. Following oral administration of Somophyllin-CRT or TheoDur, areas under the serum concentration-time curves were greater during the day than the night, with Somophyllin-CRT yielding greater areas than TheoDur for both dosing intervals. Theophylline was absorbed more rapidly during the day than the night, as evidenced by a time to maximum concentration that occurred earlier in the daytime dosing interval. We conclude that theophylline clearance is not characterized by a circadian rhythm and that absorption of theophylline from Somophyllin-CRT and TheoDur is more rapid and complete during the day than the night.

Administration-time-dependency of the pharmacokinetic behavior and therapeutic effect of a once-a-day theophylline in asthmatic children.

Using a double-blind, placebo-control, crossover study design, 8 asthmatic children (8-15 years) were evaluated for temporal patterns in airways function throughout separate study periods when treatment was placebo or Theo-24 once-daily on separate occasions at 0600, 1500 or 2100 hr. During 39-hr in-hospital observations, pulmonary function and serum theophylline concentrations (STC) were assessed every 3 hr under all treatments. The pharmacokinetics of Theo-24 varied greatly depending on the dosing time. For the afternoon and evening dosings, the Cmax, Tmax, AUC, % swing, % fluctuation, % AUC fluctuation, % nocturnal excess and Cav(2-6 hr) were all statistically significantly greater than for the morning dosing. Compared with the placebo regimen, dosing patients with Theo-24 at 1500 hr disrupted circadian patterns of airways function, especially airways patency, while dosing at 2100 hr, reduced the amplitude and shifted the acrophase of several spirometric measures to a slightly earlier time. Theo-24 treatment irrespective of dosing time resulted in comparable enhancement of the group 24-hr mean, minimum and maximum values of airways patency with reference to placebo baselines. Theo-24 dosing at 1500 or 2100 hr, however, resulted in the best effect on the airways as assessed by the 24-hr mean FEV 1.0 level in 7 of the 8 asthmatic children. When the drug was given at 1500 hr, the time of lowest FEV 1.0 was shifted from the nighttime hours in 5 of 8 patients. These findings suggest that clinicians need to individualize the theophylline dosing schedule of patients to best control the symptoms of asthma.