Osteoporosis does not affect bone mineral density change in the proximal humerus or the functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of unilateral displaced 3- or 4-part fractures at 12-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) changes in the proximal humerus of the shoulder during a healing period of 12 months after displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with an anatomic angular stable locking plate and the influence on fracture healing and functional outcomes. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, 36 patients (29F and 7M, age range: 38-83) with unilateral displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures were included for ORIF. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis status was employed. Postoperative and 6-week, 3-, 6-, and 12-month shoulder radiographs and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the shoulder with BMD measures in 4 templated regions of interest (ROIs) were performed. Functional outcomes, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index, Constant score, visual analog scale pain (VAS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey, were collected. RESULTS: A total of 17 of 36 patients had osteoporosis. We found no differences in BMD changes, functional outcomes, radiology, or need for revision surgery between the osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis groups. The BMD values gradually declined from baseline to 3-month follow-up in all 4 ROIs of the operated shoulders. All 4 ROIs in the operated shoulder presented with a reduction in BMD at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with baseline, whereas no significant BMD changes were seen in the healthy shoulder during the study period. The functional outcomes displayed an increase in Constant score from 3 to 12 months, but a decrease in domains of the 36-Item Short Form Survey from preinjury to 12 months (physical functioning, general health, and bodily pain). Preinjury and 12-month Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index, VAS pain at rest, and VAS pain at activity were comparable. CONCLUSION: BMD changes appeared swiftly in the proximal humerus, after the treatment of displaced 3- or 4-part fractures with ORIF, particularly affecting the proximal diaphysis of the humerus. Shoulder function was restored to preinjury levels for most of the patients. Osteoporosis may not be regarded as a contraindication for the treatment of displaced 3- or 4-part fractures with ORIF.

Increased shoulder pain across an exercise session and subsequent shoulder exercise: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder complaints are common and the recommended first-line treatment is exercise therapy. However, it remains unknown if increased shoulder pain after an exercise session is a barrier for subsequent exercise dose, particularly in people with high fear-avoidance beliefs. Such knowledge could indicate ways to optimise shoulder rehabilitation. The aim was to examine whether increased shoulder pain across an exercise session was associated with a lower subsequent exercise dose, and if high fear-avoidance beliefs exaggerated this association. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study using data from a randomised controlled trial in Central Denmark Region 2017-2019. Participants were employees (n = 79) with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. The intervention was a home-based or partly supervised exercise programme lasting 2-3 months. Linear mixed models were used to examine the associations between change in shoulder pain and exercise dose (number of repetitions, progression level (1-3), resistance level (1-3), and time until next exercise session [days]). RESULTS: At baseline, the participants had a median pain intensity at rest of 2 on a numerical rating scale (0-10). For a 1-cm increase in pain on a visual analogue scale (0-10 cm) during an exercise session, the subsequent number of repetitions, progression level and resistance level were - 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.4 to 0.9), 0.0 (95% CI - 0.1 to 0.0) and - 0.0 (95% CI - 0.1 to 0.0), respectively. Likewise, the time until next exercise session was - 0.6 (95% CI - 2.4 to 1.3) days for a 1-cm increase. There were no interactions with fear-avoidance beliefs. CONCLUSION: Increased pain across an exercise session was not associated with subsequent exercise dose, regardless of fear-avoidance beliefs, among employees with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov 19/05/2017 (ID: NCT03159910).

Early offset-increasing migration predicts later revision for humeral head resurfacing implants. A randomized controlled radiostereometry trial with 10-year clinical follow-up.

In a randomized controlled setting, medium-term implant migration and long-term clinical outcomes were compared for the Copeland and the Global C.A.P. humeral head resurfacing implants (HHRI). Thirty-two patients (mean age 63 years) were randomly allocated to a Copeland (n = 14) or Global C.A.P. (n = 18) HHRI. Patients were followed for 5 years with radiostereometry, Constant Shoulder Score, and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS). WOOS and revision status were also obtained cross-sectionally at a mean 10-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, total translation (TT) was 0.75 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.97) for the Copeland HHRIs and 1.15 mm (95% CI: 0.85-1.46) for the Global C.A.P. HHRIs (p = 0.04), but the clinical scores were similar at all follow-ups. The cumulative risks of revision at 5 and 10 years were 29% and 43% for Copeland and 35% and 41% for Global C.A.P HHRIs (p > 0.7). No implants were loose at revision, but HHRIs that were later revised followed an early offset-increasing migration pattern with medial translation and lift-off resulting in a mean 0.53 mm (95% CI: 0.18-0.88) higher TT at the 1-year follow-up compared to non-revised HHRIs. In conclusion, the Global C.A.P. HHRI had higher TT compared with the Copeland HHRI, but clinical scores and revision rates were similar. Nonetheless, revision rates were high and challenge the use of HHRIs. Interestingly, an early radiostereometry evaluated HHRI migration pattern with increased off-set predicted later implant revision.

High Patient Satisfaction with Examination by Advanced Practice Physiotherapists in an Orthopaedic Outpatient Shoulder Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.

Purpose: To evaluate patients' satisfaction with being examined and diagnosed in an orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic, determine whether a difference exists between levels of satisfaction among patients examined by advanced practice physiotherapists (APPs) and orthopaedic surgeons (OSs), and explore patients' experiences with being examined by APPs. Method: One hundred and thirty-three patients participated in a cross-sectional questionnaire study using the Visit-Specific Satisfaction Instrument (VSQ-9). Primary outcome was satisfaction with "The visit overall" (item 9). Nine patients participated in semi-structured interviews, which were thematically analyzed. Results:There was no significant difference in satisfaction with "The visit overall" between patients examined by an OS (median: 75, 1st-3rd quartiles: 75-100) and an APP (median: 100, 1st-3rd quartiles: 75-100). The VSQ-9 total score was not significantly different between groups, but some items regarding direct interaction with the health provider were scored significantly higher in the APP group. Patients were particularly satisfied with APPs' ability to explain during the consultation. Conclusions: The results showed high levels of satisfaction with examinations performed by both OSs and APPs with no difference between groups concerning "The visit overall." From a patient perspective, the results support the use of APPs to examine and diagnose selected patients in an orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic.

Objectif : évaluer la satisfaction des patients après un examen et un diagnostic dans une clinique orthopédique ambulatoire de l'épaule, déterminer s'il y a une différence entre les taux de satisfaction chez les patients examinés par des physiothérapeutes en pratique avancée (PPA) et les chirurgiens orthopédiques (CO) et explorer les expériences des patients examinées par des PPA. Méthodologie : au total, 133 patients ont participé à un questionnaire transversal faisant appel à l'instrument de satisfaction lors de la visite (VSQ-9). Le résultat primaire était la satisfaction à l'égard de « l'ensemble de la visite ¼ (point 9). Neuf patients ont participé à des entrevues semi-structurées, analysées par thème. Résultats : il n'y avait pas de différence significative sur le plan de la satisfaction à l'égard de « l'ensemble de la visite ¼ entre les patients examinés par un CO (médiane : 75, premier au troisième quartiles : 75 à 100) et un PPA (médiane : 100, premier au troisième quartiles :75 à 100). Le score total du VSQ-9 n'était pas significativement différent entre les groupes, mais certains points relatifs à l'interaction directe avec le professionnel de la santé obtenaient un pointage beaucoup plus élevé dans le groupe des PPA. Les patients étaient particulièrement satisfaits par la capacité des PPA à donner des explications pendant la consultation. Conclusions : les résultats ont démontré un taux élevé de satisfaction à l'égard des examens effectués à la fois par des CO et des PPA, sans différence entre les groupes au sujet de « l'ensemble de la visite ¼. De l'avis des patients, les résultats soutiennent le recours au PPA pour examiner et diagnostiquer certains patients dans une clinique orthopédique ambulatoire de l'épaule.

Inter-professional agreement and collaboration between extended scope physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons in an orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic - a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Extended scope physiotherapists (ESP) are increasingly supplementing orthopaedic surgeons (OS) in diagnosing patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Studies have reported satisfactory diagnostic and treatment agreement between ESPs and OSs, but methodological study quality is generally low, and only few studies have evaluated inter-professional collaboration. Our aims were: 1) to evaluate agreement on diagnosis and treatment plan between ESPs and OSs examining patients with shoulder disorders, 2) to explore and evaluate their inter-professional collaboration. METHODS: 1) In an orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic, 69 patients were examined independently twice on the same day by an ESP and an OS in random order. Primary and secondary diagnoses (nine categories) and treatment plan (five categories, combinations allowed) were registered by each professional and compared. Percentage of agreement and kappa-values were calculated. 2) Two semi-structured focus-group interviews were performed with ESPs and OSs, respectively. Interviews were based on the theoretical concept of Relational Coordination, encompassing seven dimensions of communication and relationship among professionals. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: 1) Agreement on primary diagnosis was 62% (95% CI: [50; 73]). ESPs and OSs agreed on the combination of diagnoses in 79% (95% CI: [70; 89]) of the cases. Partial diagnostic agreement (one professional's primary diagnosis was also registered as either primary or secondary diagnosis by the other) was 96% (95% CI: [91; 100]). Across treatment categories, agreement varied between 68% (95% CI: [57; 79]) and 100%. In 43% (95% CI: [31; 54]) of the cases, ESP and OS had full concordance between treatment categories chosen, while they agreed on at least one recommendation in 96% (95% CI: [91; 100]). 2) Positive statements of all dimensions of relational coordination were found. Three themes especially important in the inter-professional collaboration emerged: Close communication, equal and respectful relationship and professional skills. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of cases, the ESP and OS registered the same or partly the same diagnosis and treatment plan. Indications of a high relational coordination implying a good inter-professional collaboration were found. Our results support that ESPs and OSs can share the task of examining selected patients with shoulder disorders in an orthopaedic clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03343951 . Registered 10 November 2017.

Reducing shoulder complaints in employees with high occupational shoulder exposures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study (The Shoulder-Café Study).

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, exercise therapy in combination with work modification is the first-choice treatment for persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. To obtain this treatment they must visit several healthcare providers, which makes usual care fragmented and uncoordinated. Therefore, we developed a new intervention which unifies the expertise that is needed. The main hypotheses are that a group-based Shoulder-Café intervention will more effectively reduce (1) shoulder complaints and (2) occupational shoulder exposures than an individual-based Shoulder-Guidance intervention (active control - enhanced usual care). METHODS: A cluster-randomised trial is conducted including 120 employees with high occupational shoulder exposures. Companies (clusters) are randomised to either Shoulder-Café or Shoulder-Guidance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are 18-65 years old and have an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) ≤ 40. Both interventions include a home-based shoulder-exercise programme, assessment of shoulder exposures by technical measurements and self-report, and general information on how to reduce shoulder exposures. The Shoulder-Café course also includes three café meetings with physiotherapist-supervised exercises, clinical shoulder evaluation, education on shoulder anatomy, workplace-orientated counselling, and an opportunity for a workplace visit by a health and safety consultant. The primary outcomes are the OSS at 6-month follow-up (hypothesis I), and the mean number of min/day with the arm elevated > 60° shortly after the end of the intervention (hypothesis II). We will use a mixed-model analysis that allows for company clustering, and data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures are an obvious target group for secondary prevention efforts. We developed the Shoulder-Café to reduce shoulder complaints and shoulder exposures while unifying the expertise that is needed to evaluate and treat shoulder complaints. If the intervention is effective, it would warrant widespread implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03159910. Registered on 18 May 2017.

Evaluation of periprosthetic bone mineral density and postoperative migration of humeral head resurfacing implants: two-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Implant migration, bone mineral density (BMD), length of glenohumeral offset (LGHO), and clinical results were compared for the Copeland (Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) and the Global C.A.P. (DePuy Int, Warsaw, IN, USA) humeral head resurfacing implants (HHRIs). METHODS: The study randomly allocated 32 patients (13 women), mean age 63 years (range, 39-82 years), with shoulder osteoarthritis to a Copeland (n = 14) or Global C.A.P. (n = 18) HHRI. Patients were monitored for 2 years with radiostereometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS). LGHO was measured preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 2 years, total translation (TT) was 0.48 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.21 mm) for the Copeland and 0.82 mm (SD, 0.46 mm) for the Global C.A.P. (P = .06). Five HHRI were revised, and in the interval before the last follow-up (revision or 2 years), TT of 0.58 mm (SD, 0.61 mm) for revised HHRI was higher (P = .02) than TT of 0.22 mm (SD, 0.17 mm) in nonrevised HHRI. A comparison of TT at the last follow-up (revision or 2 years) found no difference between the HHRIs (P = .12). Periprosthetic BMD decreased initially but increased continuously after 6 months for both HHRIs. At 2 years, BMD was 48% higher around the Copeland HHRI (P = .005). The mean difference in LGHO was significantly higher for the Copeland than for the Global C.A.P. HHRI (P = .02). Clinical results evaluated with CSS and WOOS improved over time for both implant groups (P < .01), with no differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both implants had only little migration and good clinical results. Periprosthetic BMD and LGHO both increased for the Copeland HHRI more than for the Global C.A.P HHRI.

The Copeland resurfacing humeral head implant does not restore humeral head anatomy. A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Recently, there has been concern that the Copeland resurfacing humeral head implant (RHHI) leaves the shoulder joint overstuffed. The purpose of this study was in a selected cohort of patients operated with a Copeland RHHI (1) to evaluate the Length of the Gleno-Humeral Offset (LGHO), (2) to assess the patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome measured by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) and (3) to determine the number of revisions in the cohort. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographs were retrieved from 71 of 91 possible patients operated with a Copeland RHHI from 2005 to 2009. The cohort consisted of 30 males and 41 females at a mean age of 61 (38-89) years. One radiologist measured the LGHO and performed double measurements. The WOOS score 1 year after surgery and the number of revisions from all patients operated with a Copeland RHHI in Denmark was requested from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. RESULTS: The mean LGHO was 4.99 ± 0.53 cm before surgery and 5.39 ± 0.58 cm after surgery, (p < 0.001). 95 % limits of agreement for measurements of LGHO were ± 0.11 cm. One year after surgery, the WOOS score was 67 for the cohort and 64 for all patients operated with a Copeland RHHI in Denmark. 13 of 71 RHHI in the cohort were revised. CONCLUSION: The Copeland RHHI causes significantly increased LGHO and leads to overstuffing in the shoulder joint. The WOOS score in the cohort was comparable to that for all other Danish patients operated with a Copeland RHHI.

Precision of novel radiological methods in relation to resurfacing humeral head implants: assessment by radiostereometric analysis, DXA, and geometrical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Resurfacing humeral head implants (RHHI) are used to preserve bone stock and restore normal anatomy in the osteoarthritic shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was: (1) to describe the use of novel radiological methods in relation to evaluation of RHHI; (2) to estimate the precision of these methods; and (3) to present preliminary clinical and radiological results at 6 months follow-up after Copeland and Global Cap RHHI. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (10 females) at a mean age of 64 (39-82) years and with shoulder osteoarthritis were randomized to a Copeland (n = 11) or Global C.A.P (n = 10) RHHI. Migration of the RHHI was analyzed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The length of gleno-humeral offset (LGHO) was measured on radiographs. The patients were followed clinically with questionnaires. RESULTS: Precision of the radiological methods was high for the LGHO and acceptable for RSA and for DXA. At 6 months, shoulder function had improved significantly for both RHHI groups. LGHO increased significantly for the Copeland RHHI and was slightly reduced for the Global C.A.P. RHHI. The implant migration and BMD change around the implant from baseline until 6 months follow-up was comparable for both RHHI. CONCLUSION: Radiostereometric analysis and DXA can be used for evaluation of RHHI, but expectedly with a lower precision as compared to standards of TKA or THA. Geometric analysis of the prosthetic shoulder is precise. We interpret that the early radiological and clinical results of the two RHHI are comparable.

Night/day ratio as predictor of preeclampsia in normoalbuminuric, diabetic women: early signs of blood pressure disorders.

PURPOSE: Day/night ratio from diurnal ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and in non-diabetic women was evaluated for its association with preeclampsia, retinopathy, HbA1c, and birth weight. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one women were recruited for AMBP performed with a Spacelab 90207 monitor. The pregnant women were 50 non-diabetic women and 111 T1DM women with normoalbuminuria and no hypertension. ANOVA, regression, and ROC curves analysis were applied. RESULTS: Women with simplex retinopathy had higher night/day ratio and lower birth weight than those without retinopathy. Women who developed preeclampsia had night/day ratio similar to those with simplex retinopathy. In first trimester they had higher blood pressure than those who did not develop preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: Simplex retinopathy and preeclampsia are associated with a reduced night/day ratio even with normal blood pressure but night/day ratio provides no better prediction of preeclampsia than the absolute values.

Precision, consistency, and reproducibility of blood pressure in diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancy: the appraisal of repeated measurements.

A monitor (Spacelab 90207) was compared with sphygmomanometric blood pressure (BP) with respect to reproducibility and variations on precision and consistency. Some 133 women with type 1 diabetes mellitus and 59 non-diabetic women were recruited. During pregnancy, systolic BP was between 6 and 12 mmHg higher in the oscillometric than the auscultatory readings, and diastolic BP was between 1 and 2.6 mmHg. The association of difference with the mean BP disappeared with progression of pregnancy and the repetition of measurements in diabetic pregnancy. The precision, reproducibility, and trend of association over the scale of measurement were improved in the repeated compared to individual measurements, whereas consistency did not improve.

[Scapulae alatae--angels' wings. A study of 64 patients treated with braces and physical therapy at the Viberg's hospital]. / Scapulae alatae--englevinger. En opgørelse of 64 patienter behandlet med brace-bandage og fysioterapi på Viborg Sygehus.

INTRODUCTION: Scapula winging is characterized by a paresis/paralysis of either m. serratus anterior innervated by n. thoracis longus or m. trapezius innervated by n. accesorius. This investigation reveals the results after bracing and muscle training in patients suffering from scapula winging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, consecutive series consisting of 64 patients, 43 males and 21 females with a mean age of 37.8 years (15-75 years), were treated with bracing and muscle training in 1998-2001. Prior to the treatment of bracing all patients suffered from shoulder pain, shoulder fatigue and limited range of motion as well as cosmetic complaints, 28 patients had shoulder pain. RESULTS: At the time of the investigation all 64 patients had stopped using the brace after an average of 11 months (3-29 months). A total of 61 patients had returned to their previous work and sports activities. By the time of the one year follow-up control 18 (50%) patients had gained normal shoulder functions and had no complaints and no visible scapula winging. Ten (32%) had minor disability and two (6%) had major disability. Two patients had relapse of their scapula winging. (Both patients had formerly had normal ENG/EMG). DISCUSSION: We find that the combination of bracing and muscle training is successful in treating scapula winging. Electroneurography (ENG)/electromyography (EMG) was routinely performed but did not show any prognostic value for the treatment in our investigation.