Disease Recurrence during Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Metastatic Melanoma: Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiological Characteristics in Patients from a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

Despite the dramatic improvements in recurrence-free survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), a number of patients develop metastases during adjuvant therapy. It is not currently possible to predict which patients are most likely to develop disease recurrence due to a lack of reliable biomarkers. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the case records of all patients who commenced adjuvant ICI therapy between January 2018 and December 2021 in a single university skin cancer center (n = 46) (i) to determine the rates of disease recurrence, (ii) to examine the utility of established markers, and (iii) to examine whether re-challenge with immunotherapy resulted in clinical response. Twelve out of forty-six (26%) patients developed a relapse on adjuvant immunotherapy in our cohort, and the median time to relapse was 139 days. Adjuvant immunotherapy was continued in three patients. Of the twelve patients who developed recurrence during adjuvant immunotherapy, seven had further disease recurrence within the observation period, with a median time of 112 days after the first progress. There was no significant difference comparing early recurrence (<180 days after initiation) on adjuvant immunotherapy to late recurrence (>180 days after initiation) on adjuvant immunotherapy. Classical tumor markers, including serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and S-100, were unreliable for the detection of disease recurrence. Baseline lymphocyte and eosinophil counts and those during immunotherapy were not associated with disease recurrence. Interestingly, patients with NRAS mutations were disproportionately represented (60%) in the patients who developed disease recurrence, suggesting that these patients should be closely monitored during adjuvant therapy.

Dacarbazine in the management of metastatic melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint therapy: a valid option or obsolete?

Despite the dramatic improvement in both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, up to 60% will develop treatment resistance and 50% will die from their disease. Therefore, although dacarbazine is no longer a mainstay of modern melanoma management, we examined the extent to, and in which context, it may still play a role. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of patients who had received dacarbazine treatment between October 2014 and October 2021, following innate or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors, was performed to determine PFS and OS and examine tolerability. Nine patients with locally advanced ( n = 1) or metastatic melanoma ( n = 8) were identified (average age: 74 years, 4 males and 5 females). The number of cycles of dacarbazine ranged from 2 to 45 (mean = 12). One-third of patients developed a complete ( n = 2) or partial ( n = 1) response, two-thirds did not respond to treatment. The median PFS time was 90 days. Common adverse events included blood dyscrasias; one patient developed a grade 3 hepatitis, although it was unclear if this was due to the chemotherapy or the preceding combined immunotherapy. Dacarbazine may still be a valid option in the setting of treatment for refractory, relapsed, or progressive disease. Future studies should focus on the immunomodulatory effects of dacarbazine on the tumor microenvironment, which could be harnessed to potentially restore sensitivity to immune checkpoint-based therapy.

The treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors: implications for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer, which typically affects elderly and immunocompromised and/or immunosuppressed patients. The checkpoint inhibitor avelumab, a mAb targeting the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic MCC, achieving dramatic improvements in disease control and overall survival. However, checkpoint inhibitors are associated with the development of immune-related adverse events, such as exacerbation of pre-existing RA. Although most immune-related adverse events can be managed successfully with CSs, their frequent and/or long-term use runs the risk of undermining the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition. METHODS: We report two cases of MCC, in which immunosuppressive therapy for the management of RA was administered. RESULTS: Immunosuppression for (i) pre-existing and (ii) immune checkpoint inhibitor-exacerbated RA was associated with progression of metastatic MCC. CONCLUSION: Any decision to initiate immunosuppressive treatment for RA in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy should include careful consideration of the risk of potentially fatal cancer progression and be taken after consultation with the patient's oncologist and rheumatologist. When the immunosuppressive treatment is required, it should be administered for as short a time as possible and under strict clinical and radiological surveillance.

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on quality of life in skin cancer patients.

With more than 82 million cases worldwide and almost two million deaths, the Covid-19 global pandemic shows little sign of abating. However, its effect on quality of life (QoL) in skin cancer patients has not been systematically evaluated to date. Given that QoL impairments may be associated with increased psychological morbidity, and may interfere with engagement with cancer therapy and follow-up, we prospectively evaluated quality of life in skin cancer patients using the Covid-19 Emotional Impact Survey (C-19EIS) and the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. 101 patients (48 females and 53 males) completed both questionnaires. The mean C-19EIS score was 3.8 on a scale from 0 (no impact) to 12 (severe impact). Patients undergoing systemic therapy showed significantly impaired physical (p = 0.006) and social functioning (p = 0.003). However, when compared to the published normative EORTC QLQ-C30 data, there was no evidence that the Covid-19 pandemic had significantly impacted upon overall quality of life. Subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 were significantly inversely correlated with the C-19EIS, validating its use in skin cancer patients. Despite the Covid-19 pandemic, skin cancer patients in our tertiary referral center were surprisingly resilient. However, given the geographical variations in the rates of Sars-CoV-2 infection it is possible that the low incidence in Northern Germany may have resulted in a lack of general QoL impairments. Multi-center studies are required to further determine the impact of Covid-19 on psychological wellbeing in skin cancer patients in order to develop supportive interventions and to ensure that engagement with cancer care services is maintained in order to enable early detection of cancer progression and/or recurrence.

Low-dose ipilimumab combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma following anti-PD-1 treatment failure.

Combined immunotherapy is associated with a significant risk of severe and potentially fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the side profile and efficacy of low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg, IPI1) combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients who progressed after anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nine patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma treated with combined low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg, IPI1) and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, following progression after anti-PD-1 treatment, were identified. Treatment response and irAEs were recorded. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in one-third of patients. Interestingly, there were no grade 4 or 5 irAEs. In fact, four out of the nine patients experienced no irAEs at all. One patient discontinued combined immunotherapy due to immune-related colitis. The mean time to the onset of grade 3 irAEs was 14.3 weeks. The objective response rate was 33.3% and a disease control rate of 66.7% was achieved. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months and median overall survival (OS) was 21.6 months. The median PFS when IPI1 and anti-PD-1 treatment was administered in the second-line setting was not reached, but only 2.8 months when used in subsequent treatment settings. Combined IPI1 and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was well tolerated. Its use in the third-line or above setting was associated with a significantly poorer prognosis than in the second-line setting. Larger, prospective studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this dosing regimen following anti-PD-1 treatment failure.

Hydrogen sulfide reduces the activity of human endothelial cells.

INTRODUCTION: The volatile endogenous mediator hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is known to impair thrombus formation by affecting the activity of human platelets. Beside platelets and coagulation factors the endothelium is crucial during thrombogenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effect of the H2S donor GYY4137 (GYY) on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro. METHODS: Flow cytometry of resting, stimulated or GYY-treated and subsequently stimulated HUVECs was performed to analyse the expression of E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. To study a potential reversibility of the GYY action, E-selectin expression was further assessed on HUVECs that were stimulated 24 h after GYY exposure. A WST-1 assay was performed to study toxic effects of the H2S donor. By using the biotin switch assay, protein S-sulfhydration of GYY-exposed HUVECs was assessed. Further on, the effects of GYY on HUVEC migration and von Willebrand factor (vWF) secretion were assessed. RESULTS: GYY treatment significantly reduced the expression of E-selectin and ICAM-1 but not of VCAM-1. When HUVECs were stimulated 24 h after GYY treatment, E-selectin expression was no longer affected. The WST-1 assay revealed no effects of GYY on endothelial cell viability. Furthermore, GYY impaired endothelial migration, reduced vWF secretion and increased protein S-sulfhydration. CONCLUSIONS: Summarizing, GYY dose dependently and reversibly reduces the activity of endothelial cells.

The slow releasing hydrogen sulfide donor GYY4137 reduces neointima formation upon FeCl3 injury of the carotid artery in mice.

INTRODUCTION: Neointima formation is closely linked to vascular stenosis and occurs after endothelial damage. Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous pleiotropic mediator with numerous positive effects on the cardio vascular system. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effect of the slow releasing hydrogen sulfide donor GYY4137 (GYY) on neointimal formation in vivo. METHODS: The effect of GYY on neointimal formation in the carotid artery was studied in the FeCl3 injury model in GYY- or vehicle-treated mice. The carotid arteries were studied at days 7 and 21 after treatment by means of histology and immunohistochemistry for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). RESULTS: GYY treatment significantly reduced the maximal diameter and the area of the newly formed neointima on both days 7 and 21 when compared to vehicle treatment. GYY additionally reduced the number of PCNA- and α-SMA-positive cells within the neointima on day 21 after FeCl3 injury of the carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS: Summarizing, single treatment with the slow releasing hydrogen sulfide donor GYY reduced the extent of the newly formed neointima by affecting the cellular proliferation at the site of vascular injury.