RESUMO
Background: Foot orthoses (FOs) are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) and orthopedic surgeons for various complaints. As there are very limited medical guidelines and checklists, the prescription of FOs is often inconsistent. Therefore, our study to evaluate the general prescription behavior and indication experiences with FOs from the perspective of GPs and orthopedists. Methods: A survey was carried out using a questionnaire from October to December 2021. GPs and orthopedic surgeons in northern Germany were included. The focus of the survey was to examine which foot problems would lead GPs and orthopedic surgeons to prescribe FOs and to evaluate what factors these physicians included in their diagnostic analysis. Apart from descriptive analyses, a stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to explore potential associations of the primary outcome variable 'specific effect on the prescription of FOs', which was introduced to shed light upon the estimated added value of the prescription of FOs. Results: Out of the 790 questionnaires distributed, 184 questionnaires were returned by GPs (n = 95) and orthopedic surgeons (n = 74) (response rate 23 %). FOs were most frequently prescribed for talipes valgus (96 %) and heel spur (54 %). Diagnostic analysis was mainly carried out clinically. Custom-made FOs (82 %) were prescribed more frequently than prefabricated FOs (6 %). Regular interaction within the prescription process was most commonly with orthopedic technicians (61 %). The estimation of the specific effect on FO prescription was assessed by a mean of 66 % of the participants, 82 % recommended self-exercises as an additional therapy. Conclusions: FOs are a specific and well-established aid prescribed by many GPs and orthopedic surgeons for a variety of foot complaints. Despite being one of the most frequently prescribed orthopedic devices, the utilization of FOs is predominantly explorative due to a growing but nevertheless still deficient body of well-researched evidence. There is a clear need for a uniform approach to the indication and prescription of FOs among physicians.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic insoles (OI) are used to treat a variety of foot problems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the perceptions of the treatment with OI among the manufacturers of the OIs, the orthopaedic technicians (OT). METHODS: OT from the federal states of Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony in Germany were invited to take part in a survey. The questions included, among others, the number of prescriptions for the production of an OI per month and the materials used. Descriptive statistics, subgroup analyses and a linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of the 312 questionnaires distributed, 159 were completed (response rate 51%). Most of the respondents were male (80%). The average age of the participants was 50. On average, OT produced 290 OI per month, with plastic being the most commonly used material (73%). OT with less than 20 years of professional experience are more likely to follow the doctor's instructions when producing OI than OT with more than 20 years of professional experience. The latter are more likely to base their decisions regarding the manufacture and issuing of OI on their own experience. CONCLUSIONS: The production and issuing process of OI differs among OT. The different professional perspectives of the OT could play a role here, as does the lack of a standardized procedure. The factors listed in this study represent potential starting points for future research projects that could contribute to the development of evidence-based standards.
