[Airway management in neonates and infants : Recommendations according to the ESAIC/BJA guidelines]. / Atemwegssicherung bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen : Handlungsempfehlung gemäß der BJA/ESAIC-Leitlinie.

Securing an airway enables the oxygenation and ventilation of the lungs and is a potentially life-saving medical procedure. Adverse and critical events are common during airway management, particularly in neonates and infants. The multifactorial reasons for this include patient-dependent, user-dependent and also external factors. The recently published joint ESAIC/BJA international guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants are summarized with a focus on the clinical application. The original publication of the guidelines focussed on naming formal recommendations based on systematically documented evidence, whereas this summary focusses particularly on the practicability of their implementation.

Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Many serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported. METHODS: This prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method. RESULTS: Of 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Methods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.

Effect of vertical stopcock position on start-up fluid delivery in syringe pumps used for microinfusions.

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of the vertical level of the stopcock connecting the infusion line to the central venous catheter on start-up fluid delivery in microinfusions. Start-up fluid delivery was measured under standardized conditions with the syringe outlet and liquid flow sensors positioned at heart level (0 cm) and exposed to a simulated CVP of 10 mmHg at a set flow rate of 1 ml/h. Flow and intraluminal pressures were measured with the infusion line connected to the stopcock primarily placed at vertical levels of 0 cm, + 30 cm and - 30 cm or primarily placed at 0 cm and secondarily, after connecting the infusion line, displaced to + 30 cm and - 30 cm. Start-up fluid delivery 10 s after opening the stopcock placed at zero level and after opening the stopcock primarily connected at zero level and secondary displaced to vertical levels of + 30 cm and - 30 cm were similar (- 10.52 [- 13.85 to - 7.19] µL; - 8.84 [- 12.34 to - 5.33] µL and - 11.19 [- 13.71 to - 8.67] µL (p = 0.469)). Fluid delivered at 360 s related to 65% (zero level), 71% (+ 30 cm) and 67% (- 30 cm) of calculated infusion volume (p = 0.395). Start-up fluid delivery with the stopcock primarily placed at + 30 cm and - 30 cm resulted in large anterograde and retrograde fluid volumes of 34.39 [33.43 to 35.34] µL and - 24.90 [- 27.79 to - 22.01] µL at 10 s, respectively (p < 0.0001). Fluid delivered with the stopcock primarily placed at + 30 cm and - 30 cm resulted in 140% and 35% of calculated volume at 360 s, respectively (p < 0.0001). Syringe infusion pumps should ideally be connected to the stopcock positioned at heart level in order to minimize the amounts of anterograde and retrograde fluid volumes after opening of the stopcock.

Evaluation of the venting principle to reduce start-up delays in syringe infusion pumps used for microinfusions.

Start-up delays of syringe pump assemblies can impede the timely commencement of an effective drug therapy when using microinfusions in hemodynamically unstable patients. The application of the venting principle has been proposed to eliminate start-up delays in syringe pump assemblies. However, effectively delivered infusion volumes using this strategy have so far not been measured. This invitro study used two experimental setups to measure the effect of the venting principle compared to a standard non-venting approach on delivered start-up infusion volumes at various timepoints, backflow volumes, flow inversion and zero drug delivery times by means of liquid flow measurements at flow rates of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mL/h. Measured delivered initial start-up volumes were negative with all flow rates in the vented and non-vented setup. Maximum backflow volumes were 1.8 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.3] times larger in the vented setup compared to the non-vented setup (p < 0.0001). Conversely, times until flow inversion were 1.5 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.9] times shorter in the vented setup (p < 0.002). This led to comparable zero drug delivery times between the two setups (p = 0.294). Start-up times as defined by the achievement of at least 90% of steady state flow rate were achieved faster with the vented setup (p < 0.0001), but this was counteracted by the increased backflow volumes. The application of the venting principle to the start-up of microinfusions does not improve the timely delivery of drugs to the patient since the faster start-up times are counteracted by higher backflow volumes when opening the three-way stopcock.

Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines.

Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1C). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1C). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).

Pressure-adjusted venting eliminates start-up delays and compensates for vertical position of syringe infusion pumps used for microinfusion.

Microinfusions are commonly used for the administration of catecholamines, but start-up delays pose a problem for reliable and timely drug delivery. Recent findings show that venting of the syringe infusion pump with draining of fluid to ambient pressure before directing the flow towards the central venous catheter does not counteract start-up delays. With the aim to reduce start-up delays, this study compared fluid delivery during start-up of syringe infusion pumps without venting, with ambient pressure venting, and with central venous pressure (CVP)-adjusted venting. Start-up fluid delivery from syringe pumps using a microinfusion of 1 mL/h was assessed by means of liquid flow measurement at 10, 60, 180 and 360 s after opening the stopcock and starting the pump. Assessments were performed using no venting, ambient pressure venting or CVP-adjusted venting, with the pump placed either at zero, - 43 cm or + 43 cm level and exposed to a simulated CVP of 10 mmHg. Measured fluid delivery was closest to the calculated fluid delivery for CVP-adjusted venting (87% to 100% at the different timepoints). The largest deviations were found for ambient pressure venting (- 1151% to + 82%). At 360 s after start-up 72% to 92% of expected fluid volumes were delivered without venting, 46% to 82% with ambient pressure venting and 96% to 99% with CVP-adjusted venting. CVP-adjusted venting demonstrated consistent results across vertical pump placements (p = 0.485), whereas the other methods had significant variances (p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, CVP-adjusted venting effectively eliminates imprecise drug delivery and start-up delays when using microinfusions.

Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines.

Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1С). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1С). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO 2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).

Identifying a target group for selenium supplementation in high-risk cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of the SUSTAIN CSX trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent data from the randomized SUSTAIN CSX trial could not confirm clinical benefits from perioperative selenium treatment in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Underlying reasons may involve inadequate biosynthesis of glutathione peroxidase (GPx3), which is a key mediator of selenium's antioxidant effects. This secondary analysis aimed to identify patients with an increase in GPx3 activity following selenium treatment. We hypothesize that these responders might benefit from perioperative selenium treatment. METHODS: Patients were selected based on the availability of selenium biomarker information. Four subgroups were defined according to the patient's baseline status, including those with normal kidney function, reduced kidney function, selenium deficiency, and submaximal GPx3 activity. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-four patients were included in this analysis. Overall, higher serum concentrations of selenium, selenoprotein P (SELENOP) and GPx3 were correlated with less organ injury. GPx3 activity at baseline was predictive of 6-month survival (AUC 0.73; p = 0.03). While selenium treatment elevated serum selenium and SELENOP concentrations but not GPx3 activity in the full patient cohort, subgroup analyses revealed that GPx3 activity increased in patients with reduced kidney function, selenium deficiency and low to moderate GPx3 activity. Clinical outcomes did not vary between selenium treatment and placebo in any of these subgroups, though the study was not powered to conclusively detect differences in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of GPx3 responders encourages further refined investigations into the treatment effects of selenium in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.

Effect of vertical pump position on start-up fluid delivery of syringe pumps used for microinfusion.

BACKGROUND: Connection and opening a syringe infusion pump to a central venous line can lead to acute anterograde or retrograde fluid shifts depending on the level of central venous pressure. This may lead to bolus events or to prolonged lag times of intravenous drug delivery, being particularly relevant when administering vasoactive or inotropic drugs in critically ill patients using microinfusion. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of syringe pump positioning at different vertical heights on start-up fluid delivery before versus after purging and connection the pump to the central venous catheter. METHODS: This in vitro study measured ante- and retrograde infusion volumes delivered to the central venous line after starting the syringe pump at a set infusion rate of 1 mL/h. In setup one, the pump was first positioned to vertical levels of +43 cm or -43 cm and then purged and connected to a central venous catheter. In setup two, the pump was first purged and connected at zero level and secondarily positioned to a vertical level of +43 cm or -43 cm. Central venous pressure was adjusted to 10 mmHg in both setups. RESULTS: Positioning of the pump prior to purging and connection to the central venous catheter resulted in a better start-up performance with delivered fluid closer to programmed and expected infusion volumes when compared to the pump first purged, connected, and then positioned. Significant backflow volumes were observed with the pump purged and connected first and then positioned below zero level. No backflow was measured with the pump positioned first below zero level and then purged and connected. CONCLUSIONS: Syringe infusion pump assemblies should be positioned prior to purging and connection to a central venous catheter line when starting a new drug, particularly when administering highly concentrated vasoactive or inotropic drugs delivered at low flow rates.

Effect of central venous pressure on fluid delivery during start-up of syringe infusion pumps for microinfusion.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of highly concentrated and potent drugs at low flow rates is common practice, particularly in critically ill children. Drug delivery during infusion start-up can be considerably delayed by intrinsic factors of syringe infusion pump assemblies. The impact of central venous pressures on the course of start-up fluid delivery of such microinfusions remains unknown. METHODS: Infusion volumes delivered after activation of the start button in a conventional 50 mL syringe infusion pump assembly equilibrated (representing classical in vitro testing) and not equilibrated (representing real clinical conditions) to central venous pressure levels of 0, 10 and 20 mmHg at a set infusion flow rate of 1 mL/h were measured using a fluidic flow sensor. RESULTS: The experimental setup mimicking real life conditions demonstrated considerable differences in fluid delivery during pump start-up depending on central venous pressure. A central venous pressure of 0 mmHg resulted in massive fluid delivery at infusion start-up, while central venous pressure levels of 10 and 20 mmHg resulted in retrograde flows with related mean (95% CI) zero-drug delivery times of 3.22 (2.98-3.46) min and 4.51 (4.33-4.69) min, respectively (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Depending on central venous pressure level, connection and starting a new syringe pump can result in significant antegrade or retrograde fluid volumes. In clinical practice, this can lead to hemodynamic instability and hence requires clinical alertness. Further research and methods to improve start-up performance in syringe infusion pump systems are desirable.

Risk patterns of consecutive adverse events in airway management: a Bayesian network analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minor adverse airway events play a pivotal role in the safety of airway management. Changes in airway management strategies can reduce such events, but the broader impact on airway management remains unclear. METHODS: Minor, frequently occurring adverse airway events were audited before and after implementation of changes to airway management strategies. We used two Bayesian networks to examine conditional probabilities of subsequent airway events and to compute the likelihood of certain events given that certain previous events occurred. RESULTS: Independent of sex, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, targeted changes to airway management strategies reduced the risk of a first event. Obese patients were an exception, in whom no risk reduction was achieved. Frequently occurring event sequences were identified, for example the most likely event to follow difficult bag-mask ventilation was a Cormack-Lehane grade ≥3, with a risk of 14.3% (95% credible interval [CI], 11.4-17.2%). An impact of the targeted changes was detected on the likelihood of some event sequences, for example the likelihood of no consecutive event after a tracheal tube-related event increased from 43.3% (95% CI, 39.4-47.6%) to 56.4% (95% CI, 52.0-60.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of risk patterns and typical structures of event sequences provides a clinically relevant perspective on airway incidents. It further provides a means to quantify the impact of targeted airway management changes. These targeted changes can influence some event sequences, but overall, the benefit results from the cumulative effect of improvements in multiple events. Targeted airway management changes with knowledge of risk patterns and event sequences can potentially further improve patient safety in airway management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02743767.

Apneic oxygenation in pediatric anesthesia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Apneic oxygenation is increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia. Its benefit for specific applications depends on the effect of apneic oxygenation on safe apnea time and carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination, on differences between low and high flow oxygen delivery, and on possible adverse effects. The present review summarizes current evidence on these pathophysiological aspects of apneic oxygenation as well as its applications in pediatric anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Apneic oxygenation with both low flow and high flow nasal oxygen increases the safe apnea time, but does not lead to increased CO2 elimination. Airway pressures and adverse effects like atelectasis formation, oxidative stress and aerosol generation under apneic oxygenation are not well studied in pediatric anesthesia. Data from adults suggest no important effect on airway pressures when the mouth is open, and no significant formation of atelectasis, oxidative stress or aerosol generation with high flow nasal oxygen. SUMMARY: Apneic oxygenation in pediatric anesthesia is mainly used during standard and difficult airway management. It is sometimes used for airway interventions, but CO2 accumulation remains a major limiting factor in this setting. Reports highlight the use of high flow nasal oxygen in spontaneously breathing rather than in apneic children for airway interventions.

Optimisation of airway management strategies: a prospective before-and-after study on events related to airway management.

BACKGROUND: Poor medical outcomes often result from series of minor events. The present study assessed events related to airway management to determine whether targeted changes to departmental strategies for airway management can reduce the incidence. METHODS: This prospective before-and-after study was performed with ethics committee approval and written informed consent from patients. Major and minor events related to airway management were prospectively recorded for 9 weeks. After implementation of changes to departmental strategies for airway management, events were again prospectively recorded over 9 weeks. Primary outcome was number of cases with events. Secondary outcomes were various predefined events. RESULTS: At study baseline, 3668 cases and at follow-up 3786 cases were assessed. Cases with events decreased from 566 (15.4%) to 433 (11.4%) (risk ratio [RR]=0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.83; P<0.01). As secondary outcomes, the following events decreased: Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4 (4.3-2.9%; RR=0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P<0.01); difficult bag-mask ventilation (3.8-2.7%; RR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89; P<0.01); hypoxaemia (3.8-2.9%; RR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96; P=0.03); unplanned use of special equipment (3.2-2.0%; RR=0.62; (95% CI, 0.47-0.83; P<0.01); oesophageal intubation (1.3-0.8%; RR=0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P=0.03); bleeding (0.8-0.2%; RR=0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.63; P<0.01); insufficient spontaneous breathing (0.3-0.0%; RR=0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68; P<0.01); communication errors (0.1-0.0%; RR=0; 95% CI, 0-NA; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of changes to departmental strategies for airway management significantly reduced cases with events related to airway management. Analysis of events and implementation of strategies that specifically target identified issues might be key to improving airway management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02743767.

Dimensional compatibility of currently available equipment for cricothyroidotomy and adult airway anatomy: an in vitro analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are scant data on the dimensional compatibility of cricothyroidotomy equipment and related airway anatomy. We compared the dimensional design of devices for cricothyroidotomy with anatomical airway data for adult patients. METHODS: For all available cricothyroidotomy equipment the outer diameter was recorded from manufacturer information or, if not available, measured using a sliding calliper. Outer diameters were compared with recently published mean (standard deviation [sd]) values for the height of the cricothyroid membrane obtained from computed tomography, separately for males (7.9 [2.2] mm) and for females (5.9 [1.7] mm). RESULTS: Twenty-one cricothyroidotomy sets (10 uncuffed, 11 cuffed) with 15 differently designed devices were included. Inner diameters of the tubes ranged from 3.5 to 6.0 mm and outer diameters from 5.0 to 11.7 mm. The outer diameter of the 15 different tubes was found to be greater than the mean membrane height of the adult male cricothyroid membrane in eight devices and greater than the mean membrane height for female adults in 10 devices. Considering the lower range of cricothyroid membrane height, 12 tube outer diameters would be too large for male adults and all 15 for female adults in this range. CONCLUSION: The outer diameter of many devices currently marketed for cricothyroidotomy are oversized for adult airway anatomy, particularly for females. For emergency front-of-neck access through the cricothyroid membrane, anatomical data suggest that cricothyroidotomy devices with outer tube diameters of <7 mm for male and <6 mm for female adult patients should be preferred.

Dimensional compatibility and limitations of tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices: a mannequin-based in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) is a well-established element of difficult intubation algorithms. Success can be limited by dimensional incompatibilities between tracheal tubes (TTs) and SGAs. METHODS: In this in vitro study, we tested the feasibility of TT passage through SGAs, removal of SGAs over TTs, and the ability to guide the flexible bronchoscope with 13 TT brands (internal diameter, 6.5-8.0 mm) and ten different SGAs (#4 and #5) in an intubation mannequin. RESULTS: We tested 1,040 combinations of SGAs and TTs. Tracheal tube passage failed in 155 (30%) combinations of the five tested first-generation SGAs (117 [46%] with SGA #4, 38 [15%] with SGA #5) and in three (0.6%) combinations of the five tested second-generation SGAs (two [0.8%] with SGA #4 and one [0.4%] with SGA #5). The reason for failed passage of a TT through a first-generation SGA consistently was a too-narrow SGA connector. Removal of the SGA over the TT in the 882 remaining combinations was impossible for all sizes of reinforced TTs, except the Parker Reinforced TT, and was possible for all non-reinforced TTs. Only one combination with SGA #4 and 84 combinations with SGA #5 were not ideal to adequately guide the flexible bronchoscope. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant combinations of adult-size TTs and SGAs can be incompatible, rendering flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through an SGA impossible. Additional limitations exist regarding removal of the SGA and maneuverability of the flexible bronchoscope.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'intubation endotrachéale guidée par bronchoscope flexible via un dispositif supraglottique (DSG) est un élément établi des algorithmes utilisés pour les intubations difficiles. La réussite de l'intubation peut être limitée par des incompatibilités dimensionnelles entre les tubes endotrachéaux (TET) et les DSG. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude in vitro, nous avons testé la faisabilité de faire passer un TET par un DSG, le retrait du DSG par-dessus le TET et la possibilité de guider un bronchoscope flexible avec 13 marques de TET (diamètre interne, 6,5-8,0 mm) et dix DSG différents (#4 et #5) sur un mannequin d'intubation. RéSULTATS: Nous avons testé 1040 combinaisons de DSG et de TET. Le passage du tube endotrachéal a échoué dans 155 (30 %) combinaisons avec les cinq DSG de première génération testés (117 [46 %] avec DSG #4, 38 [15 %] avec DSG #5) et dans trois (0,6 %) combinaisons avec les cinq DSG de deuxième génération testés (deux [0,8 %] avec DSG #4 et une [0,4 %] avec DSG #5). La raison de l'échec du passage d'un TET à travers un DSG de première génération était systématiquement liée à un connecteur de DSG trop étroit. Dans les 882 combinaisons restantes, le retrait du DSG par-dessus le TET s'est avéré impossible avec toutes les tailles de TET armés, à l'exception du TET armé Parker, et était possible avec tous les TET non armés. Une seule combinaison avec le DSG #4 et 84 combinaisons avec le DSG #5 n'étaient pas idéales pour guider le bronchoscope flexible de manière adéquate. CONCLUSION: Les combinaisons cliniquement pertinentes de TET et de DSG de tailles adultes peuvent être incompatibles, rendant impossible l'intubation endotrachéale guidée par bronchoscope flexible via un DSG. D'autres limites existent en ce qui concerne le retrait du DSG et la maniabilité du bronchoscope flexible.

Inflation volume-balloon diameter and inflation pressure-balloon diameter characteristics of commonly used bronchial blocker balloons for single-lung ventilation in children.

BACKGROUND: Balloon-tipped bronchial blocker catheters are widely used in pediatric thoracic anesthesia to establish single-lung ventilation. In clinical practice, their balloons demonstrate sudden expansion when inflated with air. In addition, there are concerns related to the high inflation pressures required to expand the balloons. METHODS: This in vitro study assessed inflation volume- and inflation pressure-balloon diameter characteristics of the Fogarty arterial embolectomy catheters and Arndt endobronchial blockers. Balloon diameters were photographically assessed during unrestricted volume- and pressure-guided inflation, using air up to the maximum allowed inflation volume as indicated by the manufacturers. Inflation pressures required to open the blocker balloons and inflation pressures needed to expand them to maximum indicated diameter were measured. RESULTS: Volume-guided inflation demonstrated a late acute rise in diameter in Fogarty blocker balloons, whereas in the Arndt endobronchial blocker balloons almost linear inflation volume-to-diameter characteristics were observed. Pressure-guided inflation on the other hand demonstrated low-volume, high-pressure characteristics in the Fogarty blocker balloons, with inflation pressures required to expand the balloons to maximum diameters ranging from (mean (SD)) 636 (75) to 947 (152) cmH2 O. The inflation pressures required to open the Fogarty blocker balloons were even >1000 cmH2 O. Inflation pressures required to expand the 5 F, 7 F, and 9 F Arndt endobronchial blocker balloons to maximum indicated diameter were much lower, namely at 218 (15), 252 (28), and 163 (8) cmH2 O. CONCLUSION: Based on these study findings, the balloons of Fogarty arterial embolectomy catheters represent high-pressure devices and do not permit stepwise controlled bronchial blockage. The Arndt endobronchial blockers have some advantages over the Fogarty blocker devices, but also represent high-pressure equipment and must be used with caution and limited duration. Manufacturers are asked to design pediatric endobronchial blocker catheters with truly high-volume, low-pressure balloons in accordance to age-related pediatric airway dimensions.

The skill of tracheal intubation with rigid scopes - a randomised controlled trial comparing learning curves in 740 intubations.

BACKGROUND: Rigid scopes are successfully used for management of difficult airways, but learning curves have not been established. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was performed at the University Hospital Bern in Switzerland to establish learning curves for the rigid scopes Bonfils and SensaScope and to assess their performance. Fifteen consultant anaesthetists and 15 anaesthesia registrars performed a total of 740 intubations (10 to 20 intubations with each device per physician) in adult patients without predictors of a difficult airway under general anaesthesia. According to randomisation, physicians intubated the patient's trachea with either the Bonfils or the SensaScope. A maximum of three intubation attempts was allowed. Primary outcome was overall time to successful intubation. Secondary outcome parameters included first attempt success, first attempt success within 60 s, failures and adverse events. RESULTS: A clear learning effect was demonstrated: Over 20 trials, intubations became 2.5-times quicker and first attempt intubation success probability increased by 21-28 percentage points. Fourteen and 20 trials were needed with the Bonfils and the SensaScope, respectively, to reach a 90% first attempt success probability. Intubation times were 23% longer (geometric mean ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.36, p < 0.001) and first attempt success was less likely (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.92, p = 0.016) with the SensaScope. Consultants showed a tendency for a better first attempt success compared to registrars. Overall, 23 intubations (10 Bonfils, 13 SensaScope) failed. Adverse events were rare and did not differ between devices. CONCLUSIONS: A clear learning effect was demonstrated for both rigid scopes. Fourteen intubations with the Bonfils and 20 intubations with the SensaScope were required to reach a 90% first attempt success probability. Learning of the technique seemed more complex with the SensaScope compared to the Bonfils. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN14429285 . Registered 28 September 2011, retrospectively registered.

Dimensional compatibility of balloon-tipped bronchial blockers with the pediatric airway anatomy using different recommendations for age-related size selection.

BACKGROUND: Age-related recommendations for size selection of bronchial blocker devices are based on a few dated anatomical autopsy and radiological studies determining lower airway dimensions in children. These recommendations are based on anterior-posterior internal bronchial diameters, which are smaller than the more relevant lateral internal bronchial diameters. METHODS: Outer diameters of bronchial blocker balloons inflated with the maximum recommended volume of air were compared to age-related lateral internal bronchial diameters of left and right proximal mainstem bronchi using five different recommendations for age-related size selection of bronchial blocker equipment in children published in the literature. RESULTS: The ratio of outer bronchial blocker diameters inflated with the maximal recommended volume of air to the median lateral internal diameters of the proximal mainstem bronchus ranged from 71.4% to 181.8% for the left side and from 61.7% to 162.6% for the right side. There were many settings where the blocker diameters did not reach the median lateral internal diameters of the proximal mainstem bronchus. This was more often observed for the right than for the left side (37 vs 22 settings). CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that irrespective of the recommendation for size selection used, neither the two balloon-tipped vascular catheters included nor the Arndt endobronchial blockers are ideal for lung isolation in children are compared with the age-related relevant dimensions of pediatric airway anatomy. A redesign of bronchial blocker equipment with age-related anatomically based high-volume, low-pressure blocker balloons made from ultrathin membranes and with smaller catheters would be desirable.