Could it be gluten? Additional skin conditions associated with celiac disease.

Celiac disease is a multifactorial, inflammatory disorder initiated and sustained by the ingestion of gluten. Occurring across a broad population, the intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations of celiac disease are variable in severity and may be nonspecific in presentation. Given that environmental, genetic, and immune factors involved in the pathogenesis of celiac disease that the digestive tract and skin share many characteristics, and with a prevalence of 0.5-1% in most populations, it is reasonable to consider varying presentations of skin conditions that are linked with celiac disease. The association between celiac disease and skin conditions has been discussed earlier, but new studies have emerged suggesting cutaneous involvement in addition to dermatitis herpetiformis. We review the current literature identifying the relationship and potential mechanisms between celiac disease and various skin conditions.

Fecal Leukocyte Esterase, an Alternative Biomarker to Fecal Calprotectin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pilot Series.

Background and Aims: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a noninvasive biomarker used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management and risk stratification of nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Leukocyte esterase is an inexpensive and widely available point-of-care inflammatory marker present on urinalysis test strips. We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of fecal leukocyte esterase (FLE) relative to FC and endoscopy and demonstrate its use as an alternative biomarker for IBD. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 70 patients who had FC ordered as part of standard clinical care also received FLE testing. FLE levels were compared with various FC cutoff values and endoscopy and pathology findings as the gold standard. Results: As the FC cutoff increased from 50 to 500 µg/g, FLE sensitivity increased from 67% to 95% while the specificity decreased from 86% to 76%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve increased from 0.79 to 0.90. An FLE of ≥1+ had the best test characteristics. Among patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation, FLE demonstrated an identical sensitivity (75%) and specificity (86%) to FC in predicting endoscopic inflammation. AUROC was 0.80 for FLE and 0.85 for FC with an optimal cutoff of ≥2+ and 301 µg/g, respectively. When used to distinguish between patients with active IBD and no/inactive IBD, FLE had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 90%, comparable with the 84% and 83%, respectively, of FC. AUROC was 0.88 for FLE and 0.91 for FC with an optimal cutoff of ≥2+ and 145 µg/g, respectively. Conclusion: FLE demonstrates adequate correlation and comparable accuracy with FC in predicting endoscopic inflammation and distinguishing between patients with active vs inactive IBD.

Endoscopic Management of Diminutive Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Although duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) are rare, the incidence, particularly for lesions ≤ 10 mm, continues to rise with the advent of widely available, high-quality endoscopy. Given their rarity and controversy regarding prognostication factors, limited guidelines exist for resection of well-differentiated, ≤ 20-mm dNETs. Importantly, lesions ≤ 10 mm in a duodenal location are ideal for consideration of endoscopic management given both morbidity and technical challenges associated with surgery and their accessibility to a wide range of endoscopic techniques. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic resection of dNETs <10 mm in a case series and literature review. METHODS: We performed a literature review and present a series of nine cases to demonstrate the viability of endoscopic resection for diminutive dNETs as an alternative to surgery. RESULTS: Our case series included nine well-differentiated diminutive dNETs in seven patients, the majority resected using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 67%, and there was no residual disease at follow-up. The literature review of 178 patients demonstrated that EMR was the most used method of resection of diminutive dNETs, 81%, compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection, 19%. The most common complication was intraoperative bleeding in 9.55%, and only 2.25% of patients had recurrence. CONCLUSION: While complications may arise with endoscopic resection of diminutive dNETs, they are usually managed endoscopically and compare favorably with the literature on surgical complication rates and typically result in shorter hospitalizations.