The clinical relevance of excisional margins after large loop excision of the transformation zone for the persistence of cervical dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: A new guideline on population-screening cervical cytology was introduced to improve diagnosis and management of (pre-)malignant cervical lesions. Subsequently, more colposcopies and more large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) were performed. There is little information about the relevance of positive margins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after LLETZ. This study assesses the clinical relevance of margins on the presence of CIN. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 567 women who had undergone LLETZ due to cervical dysplasia between January 2017 and December 2019 in Martini Hospital Groningen were included. The primary outcome was the persistence of cervical dysplasia (Pap ≥2) in relation to excisional margins. A χ2 test was performed and hazard ratios with 95% confident intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS: After median follow-up of 14 months, 9% (N = 28) with affected margins and 4% (N = 9) with clear margins had persistent cervical dysplasia (P = 0.044). Positive human papillomavirus (HPV) status was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] 8.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.19-19.22). Women with affected margins and of older age were less prone to clear HPV (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women treated with LLETZ for cervical dysplasia show favorable long-term outcomes, with low residual rate. High-risk HPV combined with excisional margin status and age appears to be an adequate risk stratification and individualized management might be based on these factors.

Staging procedures in patients with mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary do not reveal peritoneal or omental disease.

OBJECTIVES: Staging in case of a borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) is a controversial issue. Upstaging is not uncommon, but this occurs especially with presumed stage I serous borderline tumors. There are only a few documented cases of BOTs of non-serous histology that were not confined to the ovary. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of non-invasive and invasive implants in the omentum and other (extra)pelvic peritoneal surfaces in patients with a mucinous BOT (mBOT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in three hospitals in the Netherlands. All patients with a histopathological diagnosis of mBOT diagnosed from January 1st 1990 to December 1st 2015 were identified and included when the inclusion criteria were met. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients were included. Of these 74 patients, 46 (62.2%) underwent a staging procedure. In 12 (26.1%) patients, only omental tissue was obtained, in 32 (69.6%) patients, omental tissue and peritoneal biopsies were obtained and in two (4.3%) patients, only peritoneal biopsies were obtained. No implants were seen upon microscopic examination in any of the patients. Two patients (3%) developed a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Because no extra-ovarian disease was found, staging procedures in the case of an mBOT may be omitted. However, the actual perioperative decision for staging or not should be taken in the context of a frozen section diagnosis, which is not always accurate and straightforward. Recurrence with malignant disease is rare after mBOT. The value of post-treatment surveillance seems limited after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Comparison of Intraoperative γ-Probe Imaging and Postoperative SPECT/CT in Detection of Sentinel Nodes Related to the Ovary.

Tracer injection into ovarian ligaments has been shown to detect sentinel nodes (SNs) in patients with ovarian cancer. To determine the possibility that SNs are missed, this feasibility study compared their detection during surgery with their detection on postoperative SPECT/CT. METHODS: In 8 patients (with either ovarian or endometrial cancer), after a staging lymphadenectomy including resection of SNs related to the ovary, SPECT/CT was performed within 24 h. RESULTS: SPECT/CT identified hotspots in 4 patients at sites where SNs were resected. In 6 patients, additional sites were found, mainly in the pelvic region. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies between the γ-probe and SPECT/CT may be due to missed SNs during surgery, but with respect to pelvic hotspots, in most cases they are more probably related to remnants of tracer at injection sites. With respect to sites where SNs were resected, remaining hotspots may have been caused by residual lymphatic flow after resection.

The impact of lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival: A nationwide cohort study of patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To establish the impact of lymph node dissection and chemotherapy on survival in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: All Dutch patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-IIA and IIIA1 EOC between 2000 and 2012 were included. Data concerning age, stage, tumour grade, histological subtype, hospital type, lymph node dissection, adjuvant chemotherapy and survival were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Of 3658 patients included, 1813 (49.6%) had lymph nodes removed. Relative survival of patients with lymph node dissection (including those with lymph node metastases) was significantly better than that of patients without, also after correcting for stage, tumour grade, histology and age (89% and 82%, respectively; relative excess risk [RER], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.78). There was a positive correlation between the number of removed lymph nodes and overall survival (after excluding patients with lymph node metastases). Of patients with stage I-IIA EOC who had ≥10 lymph nodes removed, there was no difference in relative survival between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not (RER, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.15-1.64). This was also true for a subgroup of patients with high-risk features (stage IC and IIA and/or tumour grade 3 and/or clear cell histology [RER, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.46-1.99]). CONCLUSION: Adequate dissection of at least 10 but preferably ≥20 lymph nodes should be standard procedure for the staging of early-stage EOC. Adjuvant chemotherapy after an adequate lymph node dissection does not seem to contribute to a better relative survival.

Understanding Lymphatic Drainage Pathways of the Ovaries to Predict Sites for Sentinel Nodes in Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In ovarian cancer, detection of sentinel nodes is an upcoming procedure. Perioperative determination of the patient's sentinel node(s) might prevent a radical lymphadenectomy and associated morbidity. It is essential to understand the lymphatic drainage pathways of the ovaries, which are surprisingly up till now poorly investigated, to predict the anatomical regions where sentinel nodes can be found. We aimed to describe the lymphatic drainage pathways of the human ovaries including their compartmental fascia borders. METHODS: A series of 3 human female fetuses and tissues samples from 1 human cadaveric specimen were studied. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded transverse sections (8 or 10 µm) using antibodies against Lyve-1, S100, and α-smooth muscle actin to identify the lymphatic endothelium, Schwann, and smooth muscle cells, respectively. Three-dimensional reconstructions were created. RESULTS: Two major and 1 minor lymphatic drainage pathways from the ovaries were detected. One pathway drained via the proper ligament of the ovaries (ovarian ligament) toward the lymph nodes in the obturator fossa and the internal iliac artery. Another pathway drained the ovaries via the suspensory ligament (infundibulopelvic ligament) toward the para-aortic and paracaval lymph nodes. A third minor pathway drained the ovaries via the round ligament to the inguinal lymph nodes. Lymph vessels draining the fallopian tube all followed the lymphatic drainage pathways of the ovaries. CONCLUSIONS: The lymphatic drainage pathways of the ovaries invariably run via the suspensory ligament (infundibulopelvic ligament) and the proper ligament of the ovaries (ovarian ligament), as well as through the round ligament of the uterus. Because ovarian cancer might spread lymphogenously via these routes, the sentinel node can be detected in the para-aortic and paracaval regions, obturator fossa and surrounding internal iliac arteries, and inguinal regions. These findings support the strategy of injecting tracers in both ovarian ligaments to identify sentinel nodes.

The detection of sentinel nodes in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study.

UNLABELLED: Few sentinel node (SN) studies in ovarian cancer have been reported, mainly because of the risk of tumor dissemination associated with the injection of tracers into the ovarian cortex. To our knowledge, the injection of tracers into the ovarian ligaments has not been explored. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of the SN procedure in ovarian cancer with tracer injection into the ovarian ligaments and to establish whether the procedure is safe for the healthcare workers. METHODS: The study included patients who were at high risk of ovarian malignancy. Blue dye and radioactive colloid were injected into the proper ovarian ligament and suspensory ligament of the ovary. To measure professional radiation exposure, ring dose meters were worn by the surgeon, theater nurse, and pathologist during 3 procedures. RESULTS: An SN procedure was performed in 21 patients, and at least 1 SN location was identified in all patients using the γ probe before retroperitoneal exploration. SNs were located in the paraaortic and paracaval regions only in 67% of the patients, in the pelvic region only in 9%, and in both the paraaortic/paracaval and the pelvic regions in 24%. All but 2 SNs were found on the ipsilateral side. In 6 patients who underwent retroperitoneal exploration, 1-4 SNs were identified using the γ probe and resected. Blue-stained SNs were detected in 2 patients. Positive SNs were detected in 1 patient with lymph node metastases. The amount of radiation exposure to the surgeon, theater nurse, and pathologist did not exceed the safe limit. CONCLUSION: The identification of SNs in all cases suggests that the SN procedure performed by injection of tracers in the ovarian ligaments is feasible and promising. The procedure is safe for the involved personnel. Further investigation is necessary to determine the clinical application of this new technique.

Sentinel node in ovarian cancer: study protocol for a phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: The concept of sentinel lymph node surgery is to determine whether the cancer has spread to the very first lymph node or sentinel node. If the sentinel node does not contain cancer, then there is a high likelihood that the cancer has not spread to other lymph nodes. The sentinel node technique has been proven to be effective in different types of cancer. In this study we want to determine whether a sentinel node procedure in patients with ovarian cancer is feasible when the tracers are injected into the ovarian ligaments. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with a high likelihood of having an ovarian malignancy in whom a median laparotomy and a frozen section analysis is planned and patients with endometrial cancer in whom a staging laparotomy is planned will be included.Before starting the surgical staging procedure, blue dye and radioactive colloid will be injected into the ligamentum ovarii proprium and the ligamentum infundibulo-pelvicum. In the analysis we calculate the percentage of patients in whom it is feasible to identify sentinel nodes. Other study parameters are the anatomical localization of the sentinel node(s) and the incidence of false negative lymph nodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Approval number: NL40323.068.12Name: Medical Ethical Committee Maastricht University Hospital, University of MaastrichtAffiliation: Maastricht University HospitalBoard Chair Name: Medisch Ethische Commissie azM/UM.