Prepregnancy Obesity Is Not Associated with Iron Utilization during the Third Trimester.

BACKGROUND: An adequate maternal iron supply is crucial for maternal red blood cell (RBC) expansion, placental and fetal growth, and fetal brain development. Obese women may be at risk for poor iron status in pregnancy due to proinflammatory-driven overexpression of hepcidin leading to decreased iron bioavailability. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of prepregnancy (PP) obesity on third-trimester maternal iron utilization. DESIGN: Using the stable isotope 57Fe, we measured iron utilization in the third trimester in PP obese [BMI (in kg/m2): ≥30] and nonobese (BMI: 18.5-29.9) women. We also assessed iron status, hepcidin, inflammation, erythropoietin, dietary iron intake, and gestational weight gain. Descriptive and inferential statistical tests (e.g., Student t test, Pearson correlation) were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Fifty pregnant women (21 PP obese, 29 PP nonobese) were included. Mean age was 27.6 ± 6.8 y and mean gestational age at time of 57Fe administration was 32.7 ± 0.7 wk. Anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL for non-black and <10.2 g/dL for black women) affected 38% of women (43% PP obese compared with 35% PP nonobese; P = 0.55). Women with PP obesity had significantly higher C-reactive protein (8.5 compared with 3.4 mg/L, P = 0.0007) and total body iron corrected for inflammation (6.0 compared with 4.3 mg/kg, P = 0.04) compared with the nonobese women. There was no difference in serum hepcidin or iron utilization between the PP BMI groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the impact of PP obesity on maternal iron utilization. We found no difference in iron utilization in the third trimester of pregnancy in women with and without PP obesity. Despite higher frequency of anemia, women with PP obesity had less depleted body iron stores, suggesting some degree of iron sequestration. This finding should be followed up and extended to understand effects on fetal iron bioavailability.

Assessment of the influence of food attributes on meal choice selection by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity among women living in Chicago, USA: A discrete choice experiment.

Large and persistent obesity disparities exist in the US by socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity, and weight loss interventions have traditionally been less effective in these populations. Thus, a better understanding is needed of the behavioral, economic, and geographic factors that influence obesity risk factors such as eating behaviors. We used a discrete choice experiment to evaluate the impact of different meal attributes on meal choice and to test whether the relative importance of these attributes varied by SES and race/ethnicity. Study participants (n = 228) were given a series of 10 choice tasks and asked to choose among 4 meals, each rated based on the following attributes: taste; healthfulness; preparation time; travel time to food outlet for meal/ingredients; and price. SES was measured using education and self-reported difficulty paying for basics. Race/ethnicity was categorized as Hispanic/Latina, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic other. Data were analyzed using mixed logit regression models with interaction terms to determine whether meal attributes influenced meal choices differentially by SES and race/ethnicity. Healthfulness and taste were the most important attributes for all participants. Price was a more important attribute among those in the lowest SES group compared with those in the higher SES groups. Travel was the least important attribute for low SES participants, and it was not significantly related to meal choice in these groups. Discrete choice experiments as illustrated here may help pinpoint the most salient targets for interventions to improve eating behaviors and reduce obesity disparities. Specifically, our findings suggest interventions should incorporate strategies to target the pricing of healthy and unhealthy food options.