Urokinase receptor deficiency results in EGFR-mediated failure to transmit signals for cell survival and neurite formation in mouse neuroblastoma cells.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA and its receptor (uPAR) are the central players in extracellular matrix proteolysis, which facilitates cancer invasion and metastasis. EGFR is one of the important components of uPAR interactome. uPAR/EGFR interaction controls signaling pathways that regulate cell survival, proliferation and migration. We have previously established that uPA binding to uPAR stimulates neurite elongation in neuroblastoma cells, while blocking uPA/uPAR interaction induces neurite branching and new neurite formation. Here we demonstrate that blocking the uPA binding to uPAR with anti-uPAR antibody decreases the level of pEGFR and its downstream pERK1/2, but does increase phosphorylation of Akt, p38 and c-Src Since long-term uPAR blocking results in a severe DNA damage, accompanied by PARP-1 proteolysis and Neuro2a cell death, we surmise that Akt, p38 and c-Src activation transmits a pro-apoptotic signal, rather than a survival. Serum deprivation resulting in enhanced neuritogenesis is accompanied by an upregulated uPAR mRNA expression, while EGFR mRNA remains unchanged. EGFR activation by EGF stimulates neurite growth only in uPAR-overexpressing cells but not in control or uPAR-deficient cells. In addition, AG1478-mediated inhibition of EGFR activity impedes neurite growth in control and uPAR-deficient cells, but not in uPAR-overexpressing cells. Altogether these data implicate uPAR as an important regulator of EGFR and ERK1/2 signaling, representing a novel mechanism which implicates urokinase system in neuroblastoma cell survival and differentiation.

[Mechanisms of Participation of the Urokinase Receptor in Directed Axonal Growth].

The degradation of the extracellular matrix plays an important role in the processes of morphogenesis, angio- and neurogenesis, wound healing, inflammation, carcinogenesis and others. The urokinase receptor uPAR is an important participant in processes that regulate extracellular proteolysis, cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, cell migration along the chemokine gradient, proliferation and survival involving growth factor receptors. The presence of the GPI anchor and the absence of transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in uPAR promote involvement of membrane partners for the realization of uPAR signal effects. In some studies, involvement of the fMLP chemokine receptor FPRL in the regulation of uPAR-dependent directed migration has been shown. Moreover, the migration of neural progenitors and their maturation into neurons during the formation of brain structures are regulated by chemokine receptors. Despite the data on the role of uPARin the processes of morphogenesis, little is known about the interactions between uPAR and chemokine receptors in guidance processes during nerve growth and regeneration. In the present work, it was shown for the first time that the soluble form of uPAR (suPAR) regulates the trajectory of axon outgrowth, and this effect does not depend on the presence of urokinase. It was also shown that regulation of the directed axon growth is based on the interaction of suPAR with the chemokine receptor FPRL1. These data show new mechanisms for the participation of the urokinase system in the regulation of axon guidance.

Urokinase receptor regulates nerve regeneration through its interaction with α5ß1-integrin.

PURPOSE: Urokinase receptor (uPAR) promotes extracellular matrix proteolysis, regulates adhesion and cell migration, transduces intracellular signals through interactions with the lateral partners. The expression of uPAR and urokinase (uPA) is significantly upregulated in peripheral nerves after injury, however, little is known about uPAR function in nerve regeneration or the molecular mechanisms involved. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of uPAR in nerve regeneration after traumatic injury of n. Peroneus communis in uPA-/-, uPAR-/- or control mice (WT) and in neuritogenesis in an in vitro Neuro 2A cell model. RESULTS: Electrophysiological analysis indicates that nerve recovery is significantly impaired in uPAR-/- mice, but not in uPA-/- mice. These data correlate with the reduced amount of NF200-positive axons in regenerating nerves from uPAR-/- mice compared to uPA-/- or control mice. There is an increase in uPAR expression and remarkable colocalization of uPAR with α5 and ß1 integrin in uPA-/- mice in recovering nerves, pointing to a potential link between uPAR and its lateral partner α5ß1-integrin. Using an in vitro model of neuritogenesis and α325 blocking peptide, which abrogates uPAR-α5ß1 interaction in Neuro 2A cells but has no effect on their function, we have further confirmed the significance of uPAR-α5ß1 interaction. CONCLUSION: Taken together, we report evidence pointing to an important role of uPAR, rather than uPA, in peripheral nerve recovery and neuritogenesis.