Back to Bed: From Hospital to Home Obstetrics in the City of Chicago.

This article analyzes the role of doctors and activists in Chicago who successfully redefined the practice and politics of childbirth both locally and ultimately nationwide. It begins with the story of Joseph DeLee's Chicago Maternity Center, responsible for supervising over 100,000 home births between 1932 and 1972. Most of the mothers cared for by the Center were nonwhite, poor, and had little or no access to prenatal care, yet their babies had a far higher survival rate than the nationwide average. Thousands of medical students from all over the Midwest experienced their first deliveries not in hospitals, but in these homes. The article then addresses a very different demographic: a rising number of middle-class white families in the suburbs of Chicago who, beginning in the 1950s, opted for out-of-hospital births. Many of them learned about home birth through their involvement in La Leche League, the breastfeeding organization formed in a Chicago suburb in 1956. Seemingly separated by class, race, and locale, the link between these two groups of home birthers was the philosophy and training in place at the Chicago Maternity Center.

Communicating a New Consciousness: Countercultural Print and the Home Birth Movement in the 1970s.

This essay analyzes the production of three influential home birth texts of the 1970s written by self-proclaimed lay midwives that helped to fuel and sustain a movement in alternative birth practices. As part of a countercultural lifestyle print culture, early "how-to" books (Raven Lang's The Birth Book, Ina May Gaskin's Spiritual Midwifery) provided readers with vivid images and accounts in stark contrast to those of the sterile hospital delivery room. By the end of the decade, Rahima Baldwin's more mainstream guidebook, Special Delivery, indicated an interest in translating home birth to a wider audience who did not necessarily identify as "countercultural." Lay midwives who were authors of radical print texts in the 1970s played an important role in reshaping expectations about the birth experience, suggesting a need to rethink how we define the counterculture and its legacies.

Bodies of evidence: activists, patients, and the FDA regulation of Depo-Provera.

In January 1983, the FDA held one of only two scientific "Public Boards of Inquiry" in the history of the administration to determine whether to approve Depo-Provera for use as a contraceptive in the United States. At the hearing, ideas about gender and power played a central role in negotiations between scientists, doctors, patients, and women's health activists. The nature of the Depo-Provera Public Board of Inquiry lends itself to analysis of the interaction between and among these groups, each of which had a vested interest in the outcome of the FDA decision. The stories and strategies emerging from the actors involved in the Public Board of Inquiry reveal the enormous complexity of regulating reproduction in the late twentieth century.

"Please include this in your book": readers respond to Our Bodies, Ourselves.

This paper focuses on those ordinary women who responded to editions of Our Bodies, Ourselves in the 1970s and 1980s, illustrating how readers played a crucial role in the development and articulation of health feminism. By analyzing the exchange between writers and readers of the most popular and influential women's health text of this era, it reveals the process by which feminists translated and interpreted medical information about women's bodies. The personal stories of readers challenge us to consider the role of ordinary women in shaping the development of the women's health movement.