Is Moxifloxacin a Treatment Option for Pancreatic Infections? A Pharmacometric Analysis of Serum and Pancreatic Juice.

Postoperative local infection is a major complication after pancreatic surgery. The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the potential of moxifloxacin (MXF) to treat pancreatic infections from a pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) perspective. The PK of MXF in serum and pancreatic juice, via an inserted tube in the pancreatic duct, was determined in 19 patients up to day 7 after pancreatoduodenectomy. PK data in both specimens was analyzed with NONMEM 7.3. Intraoperative swipes were performed for microbiological examination. PK/PD target attainment was assessed in both matrices using unbound area under the plasma concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) targets of ≥30 and ≥100, for gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens, respectively. A 2-compartment population PK model in which the measurements in pancreatic juice were assigned to a scaled peripheral compartment best described the PK in both specimens simultaneously. Median (10th-90th percentile) area under the plasma concentration-time curve values after the third dose were 28.9 mg · h/L (18.6-42.0) in serum and 55.8 mg · h/L (23.7-81.4) in pancreatic juice. Target attainment rate for the intraoperatively isolated bacterial strains was ≥0.88 after the third MXF dose. For gram-negatives, high probability of target attainment ≥0.84 was observed in serum for MIC ≤ 0.125 mg/L and in pancreatic juice for MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L. For gram-positives, the probability of target attainment was 0.84-1 in serum for MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L and in pancreatic juice for MIC ≤ 1 mg/L. In conclusion, penetration of MXF into pancreatic juice was substantial. The PK/PD analysis indicated that treatment of pancreatic infections by isolates with MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L (gram-negative) and ≤1 mg/L (gram-positive) should be evaluated in further studies.

Outcome after hepatic resection for isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases in 100 patients - the role of the embryologic origin of the primary tumor.

BACKGROUND: The indication for hepatic resection (HR) in patients suffering from liver metastases (LM) other than colorectal and neuroendocrine tumors is one focus of current multidisciplinary, oncologic considerations. This study retrospectively analyzes outcome after HR for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNNE) LM in the absence of distant or extrahepatic metastases. METHODS: We included 100 consecutive patients undergoing HR for isolated NCNNE LM from a prospective database in our institution, including postoperative follow-up. Primary tumors were of mesodermal origin in 44%, of ectodermal origin in 29% and of entodermal origin in 27%. Survival analysis was performed by univariate and multivariable methods. Mean follow-up after hepatic surgery was 3.6 years (0.25-16). RESULTS: Median age at the time of HR was 59.5 years. Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival after liver resection was 56.8%, 34.3% and 24.5% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Univariate analysis after HR revealed residual disease (hepatic or primary; p = 0.02), female gender (p = 0.013), entodermal origin (p = 0.009) and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months, p = 0.002), as negative prognostic factors. Multivariable survival analysis confirmed residual disease, female gender, entodermal embryologic origin and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months) as independent negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Overall outcome after HR of NCNNE LM results in acceptable long-term outcome. Although individual decision-making today mostly relies on clinical experience for this type of disease, risk factors derived from the embryologic origin of the tumor might help in patient selection.

Does the site of primary colorectal cancer influence the outcome after resection of isolated liver metastases?

INTRODUCTION: In unresectable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the site of the primary is a strong prognostic factor warranting major adjustments in palliative medical treatment. Initial results suggested that the site of CRC influences prognosis after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). In this study, we evaluated outcome after resection of isolated CLM with regard to the location of the primary. METHODS: 221 patients with macroscopically complete resection of CLM and no known extrahepatic disease were identified. 63 patients had right-sided and 158 had left-sided CRC. Tumors of the transverse colon and rectum were excluded. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Characteristics of CLM, primary tumor stage and chemotherapeutic regimens were not significantly different between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival was comparable (41%) in patients with right- or left-sided CRC (p = 0.64). Microscopic resection margin, number of liver metastases, age and nodal status but not the site of the primary tumor significantly influenced survival. CONCLUSION: The site of the colorectal primary in this well-defined group of patients after resection of isolated CLM did not prove to be of significant prognostic value. Whether the primary tumor in CLM is located on the left side or the right should not preclude patients from surgery.

Prognostic influence of hepatic margin after resection of colorectal liver metastasis: role of modern preoperative chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Modern chemotherapy (CTX) increases survival in stage IV colorectal cancer. In colorectal liver metastases (CLM), neoadjuvant (neo) CTX may increase resectability and improve survival. Due to widespread use of CTX in CLM, recent studies assessed the role of the hepatic margin after CTX, with conflicting results. We evaluated the outcome after resection of CLM in relation to CTX and hepatic resection status. METHODS: Since 2000, 334 patients with first hepatic resection for isolated CLM were analyzed. Thirty-two percent had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (targeted therapy in 42%). Sixty-eight percent never had CTX before hepatectomy or longer than 6 months before resection. The results were gained by analysis of our prospective database. RESULTS: Positive hepatic margins occurred in 8% (independent of neoCTx). Patients after neoCTX had higher numbers of CLM (p < 0.01) and a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.03). After hepatectomy, 5-year survival was 45% and correlated strongly with the margin status (47% in R-0 and 21% in R-1; p < 0.001). Survival also correlated with margin status in the subgroups with neoCTX (p < 0.01) or without neoCTx (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis of the entire group, hepatic margin status (RR 3.2; p < 0.001) and age > 65 years (RR 1.6; p < 0.01) were associated with poorer survival. In the subgroup of patients after neoCTX (n = 106), only the resection margin was an independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases undergoing resection, the hepatic margin status was the strongest independent prognostic factor. This effect was also present after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for CLM.

Outcome after repeat resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although advances in multimodal treatment have led to prolongation of survival in patients after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRC-LM), most patients develop recurrence, which is often confined to the liver. Repeat hepatic resection (RHR) may prolong survival or even provide cure in selected patients. We evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes after RHR for CRC-LM in a single institution series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1999, 92 repeat hepatic resections (63% wedge/segmental, 37% hemihepatectomy or greater) for recurrent CRC-LM were performed in 80 patients. Median interval from initial liver resection to first RHR was 1.25 years. Any kind of chemotherapy (CTx) had been given in 88% before RHR. Neoadjuvant CTx was given in 38%. RESULTS: Hepatic margin-negative resection was achieved in 79%. Mortality was 3.8%. Overall complication rates were 53%, including infection (17%), operative re-intervention (12%), and hepatic failure (5.4%). Overall 5-year survival after first RHR was 50.3%. Univariately, primary tumor stage, the extent of liver resection, postoperative complications, and the overall resection margin correlated with survival. By multivariate analysis, primary T stage, size of metastasis, and overall R0 resection influenced survival. Survival was not independently influenced by hepatic resection margins or (neoadjuvant) CTx. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent CRC-LM can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Survival after repeat hepatic resection in this selected group of patients is encouraging and comparable to results after first liver resections.

Impact of preoperative targeted therapy on postoperative complications after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: The impact of chemotherapy (CTx) on morbidity after liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRC-LM) has been increasingly investigated during recent years. Biologic agents like bevacizumab (BEV) or cetuximab (CET) are now added as "targeted therapy" (TT), also in neoadjuvant settings. Initial series could demonstrate the safety of those regimens in liver resection but data are still scarce. We evaluated the impact of CTx with BEV or CET (CTx + TT) on perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients who underwent liver resections for CRC-LM after chemotherapy before surgery since 1999 were included. One hundred eighty-five patients (78%) had preoperative CTx regimen without biologic agents (fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, or irinotecan-based) and 52 (22%) had CTx + TT (39 BEV, 11 CET, 2 CET/BEV). After preoperative CTx + TT, a time interval of at least 4-6 weeks and a residual liver volume of >35% before surgery were required. RESULTS: Hemihepatectomy or more was performed in about half of the patients. The median amount of intraoperatively transfused blood was 0 ml in both groups (p = 0.34). Overall mortality was 1.7% and slightly elevated in patients with CTx + TT (3.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.17). Any complication occurred in (CTx + TT vs. CTx) 52% and 46%, respectively (p = 0.47). The rates of liver failure (9.6% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.98), infectious complications such as wound infection (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.62) and abdominal abscess (8% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.71), as well as the rate of relaparotomies (11.5% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.29) showed no significant differences between the groups with TT or without. In multivariate analyses, neither type nor duration of CTx nor the time interval between CTx and surgery showed any influence on complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the safety of targeted therapy before liver resection for CRC-LM. This effect may in part be due to our treatment policy (time interval to resection and residual liver volume) after intensive preoperative CTx.

Cloning and expression of the mouse dual-specificity mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase Mkp3 during mouse embryogenesis.

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatases (MKPs) constitute a growing family of dual specificity phosphatases, which dephosphorylate both serine/threonine and tyrosine residues of MAP kinases. MAP kinase signaling cascades are involved in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. In mammals, ten members of the dual-specificity MKP family have so far been identified. In this report, we describe the cloning and expression analysis of the mouse Mkp3 gene. During early development, expression of Mkp3 is most prominent in the primitive streak, presomitic mesoderm and somites, frontonasal prominence, midbrain/hindbrain boundary, branchial arches and limb buds. At later stages, expression is also detected in the tooth primordia, vibrissae, hair follicles, pinna, submandibular gland, mammary gland primordia, lung and kidney. Strong expression was detected in the adult brain.