[When does StäB (not) Work? A Qualitative, Multi-Perspective Survey on Factors that can Affect the Outcome of Inpatient-Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT)]. / Wann funktioniert StäB (nicht)? Eine qualitative, multiperspektivische Erhebung zu Faktoren, die den Erfolg einer stationsäquivalenten Behandlung (StäB) beeinträchtigen können.

OBJECTIVE: There are always cases in which an already started inpatient equivalent home treatment is terminated. Aim of our study was to reach a better understanding of the circumstances leading to a termination of IEHT that has already begun. METHODS: 17 qualitative interviews were conducted with patients, relatives as well as practitioners and therapists. Data analysis was performed by means of qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Our data shows, that there are further factors, besides the formal exclusion criteria for IEHT, that can complicate or prevent an inpatient equivalent home treatment or lead to its termination. CONCLUSION: IEHT offers many patients the possibility of an intensive treatment in their own home. However, there our various constellations that can lead to a complication or termination of an inpatient equivalent home treatment.

Premature termination, satisfaction with care, and shared decision-making during home treatment compared to inpatient treatment: A quasi-experimental trial.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient equivalent home treatment (IEHT), implemented in Germany since 2018, is a specific form of home treatment. Between 2021 and 2022, IEHT was compared to inpatient psychiatric treatment in a 12-months follow-up quasi-experimental study with two propensity score matched cohorts in 10 psychiatric centers in Germany. This article reports results on the treatment during the acute episode and focuses on involvement in decision-making, patient satisfaction, and drop-out rates. METHODS: A total of 200 service users receiving IEHT were compared with 200 matched statistical "twins" in standard inpatient treatment. Premature termination of treatment as well as reasons for this was assessed using routine data and a questionnaire. In addition, we measured patient satisfaction with care with a specific scale. For the evaluation of patient involvement in treatment decisions, we used the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). RESULTS: Patients were comparable in both groups with regard to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Mean length-of-stay was 37 days for IEHT and 28 days for inpatient treatment. In both groups, a similar proportion of participants stopped treatment prematurely. At the end of the acute episode, patient involvement in decision-making (SDM-Q-9) as well as treatment satisfaction scores were significantly higher for IEHT patients compared to inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to inpatient care, IEHT treatment for acute psychiatric episodes was associated with higher treatment satisfaction and more involvement in clinical decisions.

[Inpatient equivalent home-treatment: an overview]. / Stationsäquivalente Behandlung: Ein Überblick zum Status quo.

Inpatient equivalent home-treatment (IEHT) was implemented in Germany in 2018. Persons with a mental disorder can be admitted to acute multiprofessional IEHT to avoid or shorten inpatient hospital treatment. Exclusion criteria are amongst others lack of consent of cohabitants or endangerment of self and others. Advantages of IEHT include normalization and reduction of stigma. Nevertheless, administrative requirements are high. While there is international evidence for home treatment and crisis resolution teams, there is still a lack of evidence for the concept of IEHT, although specific studies are currently being carried out (e.g. AktiV study financed by the Innovation Fund). Overall, IEHT is important for mental health services and should be further developed.

[Inpatient-Equivalent Treatment - Direct Admission vs. Referral from Psychiatric Inpatient Units]. / Stationsäquivalente Behandlung ­ Vergleich von Direktaufnahmen mit Überweisungen von psychiatrischen Stationen.

OBJECTIVE: The implementation of Inpatient-equivalent treatment (IET) is advocated. In the Munich IET-program about 50 % of the IET patients were admitted directly whereas 50 % were transferred from inpatient units. METHODS: Data on the first N = 169 IET patients were used to compare patients being directly admitted with those who were transferred from inpatients units to IET. RESULTS: Patients admitted directly to IET more often had an affective disorder, had lower CGI scores, had better German language skills and were more often competitively employed. Most patients referred to IET from inpatient units (66 %) did not fulfil IET inclusion criteria during inpatient admission. Regarding IET duration there were no major differences between patients being directly admitted vs. those being transferred from inpatient units. CONCLUSION: Patients not fulfilling IET inclusion criteria may still profit from CHRT after stabilization on inpatient units.